“My gavel is bigger than yours, what you gonna do now?”
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers. November 21, 2018
A mind-boggling (extremely surprising and difficult to understand or imagine) new Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) report circulating in the Kremlin today discussing legal options within the American legal system to counter the illegal sanctions the United States has substituted for diplomacy, notes that this isn’t a viable option as these US courts’ rulings have exploded into fits of insanity lately—best exampled during this past week when one court ruled that it was now legal to barbarically cut out the sex organs of baby girls (known as female genital mutilation), while another court granted a Writ of Habeas Corpus to a zoo elephant seeking its freedom.
According to this report, the United States was founded on 4 July 1776 and is a constitutional republic having three separate, but co-equal branches—Executive-Legislative-Judicial—of government whose duties and powers are defined and constrained by the US Constitution.
In 1801, however, this report continues, John James Marshall became the fourth Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court and usurped the US Constitution by his making the Judiciary Branch of the US government more powerful than the Executive and Legislative ones—thus instituting over America a system of government known as “Judicial Tyranny”.
Left nearly alone in fighting against Chief Justice Marshall’s institution of “Judicial Tyranny” to replace the US Constitution, this report says, was American Founding Father, and its 3rdPresident, Thomas Jefferson—who in warning of what the Judicial Branch was doing wrote:
Our Constitution . . . intending to establish three departments, co-ordinate and independent that they might check and balance one another, it has given—according to this opinion to one of them alone the right to prescribe rules for the government of others; and to that one, too, which is unelected by and independent of the nation. . . . The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please.
The original error was in establishing a judiciary independent of the nation, and which, from the citadel of the law, can turn its guns on those they were meant to defend, and control and fashion their proceedings to its own will.
Nothing in the Constitution has given them [the federal judges] a right to decide for the Executive, more than to the Executive to decide for them. . . . The opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves, in their own sphere of action, but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch.
At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government.
Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life if secured against all liability to account.
With neither the Executive or Legislative Branches of the US government exerting their rights under the Constitution to interpret its meanings for themselves as they are supposed to do, this report details, America has been continued to be ruled by “Judicial Tyranny”—thus creating a highly distorted system of governance where judicial fiat is substituted for the will of the people, and unelected judges become more powerful than the representatives elected by citizens to protect their interests.
The consequences to the American people of being ruled over by the distorted system of “Judicial Tyranny”, instead of the Constitution, this report explains, has seen their nation being continuously roiled and divided by needless conflict because critical decisions affecting their lives they were supposed to decide for themselves by voting were, instead, illegally decided for them without their being allowed to have their voices heard—the worst of them being the Dred Scot Decision that threw their nation into Civil War, the Roe v. Wade Decision that has killed tens-of-millions of babies in their mothers wombs, and the Obergefell v. Hodges Decision that forced homosexual marriage on a nation whose Christian peoples vehemently opposed it.
In their creating the Constitution to the govern the United States constitutional republic, this report further explains, America’s Founding Fathers knew divisive issues would arise that could split apart their nation—and is why they created the individual States to be independent entities unto themselves not subordinate to the federal government—thus meaning that if the peoples of one Statewanted to legalize abortion they could, but if another State outlawed abortion that would be acceptable, too—with the only constraint upon these States being that all of them had to obey the Bill of Rights from which they all derived their freedoms from—most importantly their citizens being able to leave a State whose laws they opposed to live in one whose laws they supported.
Under the distortions of “Judicial Tyranny”, however, this report says, the American people have had thrust upon them a cookie-cutter “one size fits all” system of government exactly like a monarchy whose King or Queen decrees what is and is not legal—and as the American people overthrew this type of governance when they fought for their freedom against the British Empire, so too are they today nearing this type of conflict once again—most particularly due to insane judicial actions such as, this week alone:
A US Federal Judge blocking the Executive Branch from legally enforcing US immigration laws.
A US Federal Judge blocking a State from legally trying to enforce its own laws.
A New York State Judge granting a Writ of Habeas Corpus to an elephant in a zoo seeking its freedom.
A US Federal Judge presiding over a case where a deeply religious Christian baker is being persecuted for his refusing to make “a three-tiered white cake with cheesecake frosting that on its top would be a large figure of Satan licking a nine-inch black dildo”.
With no evidence existing that the Legislative Branch has ever exercised its duty under the Constitution to keep the Judicial Branch in check, this report continues, the same cannot be said about the Executive Branch—that was first displayed, in 1832, when President Andrew Jackson declared about a US Supreme Court ruling made against him “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it”—and that afterwards saw Jackson following the Constitution exactly by his interpreting what it meant—as all three branches of the US government are supposed to do to keep any one of them from becoming more powerful than the others.
Following President Jackson’s exertion of Executive Branch power to interpret the Constitution over the Judicial Branch, this report notes, was President Abraham Lincoln—who completely ignored a ruling by US Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney declaring that Lincoln didn’t have the power to throw people in jail without charges or trial—and afterwards saw Lincoln jail nearly 15,000 people, most of them journalists and newspaper owners.
During World War II, this report further notes, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, likewise, used his Executive Branch power to interpret the Constitution against the Judicial Branch after German Nazi spies were captured on US soil—and that caused Roosevelt to order his Attorney General: ‘They will be tried in a military court, they will be executed, it should happen within three weeks, and tell the Supreme Court if they issue a writ of habeas corpus, I will not honor it, and therefore they should not issue it. I am the Commander-In-Chief in wartime.”
Like President’s Jackson, Lincoln and Roosevelt, this report concludes, current President Donald Trump is a wartime leader, too—and whose views of Executive Branch power in interpreting the Constitution mirrors those of his predecessors who previously stood up to Judicial Branch tyranny—and whose main target is the 80-year-old Clinton Regime appointed Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer who has previously said that the laws of other countries have a bearing on America’s own—that stands in direct opposition to Trump declaring himself a nationalist whose only interest is in the American people, not the world—thus clearly showing that Trump is preparing to end the insanity of “Judicial Tyranny” over his nation once and for all, but whose enemies will come against him with everything they have to prevent.
~ the people