Please take time to read these powerful documents for your own knowing and protection.
Category: Break the Chains
In order to be free we must unlearn what we have learned.
-
Germany scraps old surveillance pact with US, Britain over NSA leaks
Germany has dissolved a fifty-years-old surveillance pact with the United States and Britain in response to a “debate about protecting personal privacy” in the country, which was sparked by revelations of the former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.The agreement that dated back to the late 1960s gave the US, Britain and France the right to request German authorities carry out surveillance operations so as to protect their troops stationed within the country.
“The cancellation of the administrative agreements, which we have pushed for in recent weeks, is a necessary and proper consequence of the recent debate about protecting personal privacy,” Germany’s Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said in a statement on Friday.
Germany was currently in talks with France to cancel its part of the agreement as well, a German official told AP on condition of anonymity.
Following Snowden’s leaks, which disclosed the span of the NSA surveillance program and revealed that Germany is the most spied on EU country by the US, there has been a heated nationwide debate on whether the alleged massive privacy breach of German citizens should have been allowed.
The documents leaked Snowden say that the US spy agency combs through half a billion of German phone calls, emails and text messages on a monthly basis.
Weeks before German national elections, the country’s opposition parties demanded to clarification to what extent the government knew of the NSA’s intelligence gathering in Germany. This comes amid reports of seemingly close ties the two national spy agencies – the NSA and the BND – have had over the years.
German government officials have insisted that American and British intelligence agencies were never given permission to break Germany’s strict privacy laws.
~RT
-
All About Your Birth Certificate and Your Wealth
Understanding Your Birth Certificate
Remember in Admiralty, Vessels documented by registration under the laws of the United States are entitled to privileges and subject to the obligations prescribed by the laws of the United States for merchant vessels.
To start out with, your parents due to their prior birth registration were already considered being registered documented vessels/mentally incompetent wards of the State, being under the guardianship of the State, who by legal marriage, where the State is a third party to the marriage contract, had an offspring/ward which they brought into this world by delivery[1], the act by which the res the subject matter of a trust, or substance thereof was placed within the actual or constructive possession or control of another in the delivery room of the maternity ward of the hospital, the port of entry for vessels/wards. Then they asked your mother for your legal name[2] in Upper Lower case which consists of one Christian name and one surname which is the name on the RECORD OF LIVE BIRTH written in upper and lowercase letters. What your mother was not told is that she delivered you to an agent/licensed doctor of the State, in a federally funded hospital, an act by which the res[3] the subject matter of a trust or substance thereof was placed within the actual or constructive possession or control of another, the State, for which in equity they created a Certificate of Live Birth with the all CAPITAL LETTERS and recorded that warehouse receipt in the commercial registry as cargo under transportation.
The hospital documented your birth with the legal name Title[4] in a distinctive style or appellation, Upper Lower case, the name by which anything is known, and because under trust law whenever title or money is transferred, a trust is created by operation of law, representing you, for which they created a CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH in all CAPITAL LETTERS, which was filed with the local Registrar and registered with the State, via Certificate of registry[5], in commercial maritime law which is a certificate of registration of a vessel according to the registry acts, for the purpose of giving her a national character i.e. U.S. citizen born in a federal zone, hospital zip code, in the judicial district in which the birthing of the vessel occurred identified by the filing with the Florida State Department of Health, Office of Vital Statistics within 5 days after your delivery, and then sent to Washington, D.C., for which the hospital receives a check for that vessel.Then the local registrar issued your parents a copy of the warehouse receipt for the cargo, the CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH from the State of Florida in all CAPITAL LETTERS, representing a vessel/ward of the State representing the abandonment of your title by registration. The State of Florida the Creator/Trustor then created a Cestui que trust (constructive trust) behind your back after the fact, with the all Upper Lower case name, and placed a value on it, based on actuarial estimates of your future labor/human resource. Then they issued a Bond against the trust’s asset, a certificate of indebtedness[6] and funded the bond through the IMF based on your future earnings from your labor as the contributing beneficiary, which is a trust asset, and set up a Federal Reserve account for the same. So now the IMF has a beneficial interest in and out of the trust estate, the legal title is now vested with the State of Florida, and held by the Alien Property Custodian in Washington, D.C.; equitable title copy of CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH held by you representing equity/labor; the Governor acting as the managing fiduciary trustee; the Secretary of State Registrar acting as fiduciary trustee until you turn of legal age; and you acting as fiduciary trustee for the trust with duties and obligations once you turn of legal age, and the Secretary of Treasury in charge of the Federal Reserve account.
That ward/vessel is a now a Vessel of the United States, documented by registration under the laws of the United States and subject to its laws and jurisdiction, and the Title goes to the Alien Property Custodian in Washington, D.C. In a maritime in rem action, jurisdiction over the person of the “defendant”, the vessel, is premised upon the presence of the vessel within the district in which the court sits. The only vessel they have jurisdiction over is the trust, that is evidenced by the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH, establishing the three points of jurisdiction NAME, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER and DATE OF BIRTH, the Federal Reserve account under the supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury who is also the managing trustee for the Social Security Administration and governor for the IMF.
Up until you turned of legal age to work, the deputy Registrar on behalf of the Registrar/ Secretary of State, or the Registrar/Secretary of State whichever signed the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH has been the fiduciary trustee for that trust created behind your back and securitized where the government owns it in part and you own it in part. Meaning the Registrar had the fiduciary duty and obligation for that Trust up until you started your first job. That is why the State can take the child away from the parents, because it is the duty and obligation of the fiduciary trustee as guardian, to look after the ward, and make sure he or she is taken care of properly.
When you filled out the Application Form SS-5 for a Social Security Card, the Registrar turned over the duty and obligation of the fiduciary trustee over to you, because he did not want to be responsible as fiduciary for anything you do in commerce using that SS Card/number. You then became the contributing beneficiary and fiduciary trustee for that trust with the duties and obligations for filing and paying the licensing taxes, registration taxes, and taxes on profits, gains and income generated for the trust once it starts to operate in commerce with a Social Security Card/number on all commercial transactions, because you on behalf of the beneficial owner “the trust”, which is resident within a territory occupied by military forces with which the United States is at war, or a resident outside the United States, for which you are considered an enemy doing business with a license and tax identifying number for the purposes “of trade” effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within said territory for which you are granted a license under the authority of the President pursuant to the Trading with the Enemy Act, as an enemy in order to trade, or attempt to trade with the enemy for the beneficial owner the “trust”, and as the fiduciary trustee paying, satisfying, compromising, or giving security for the payment or satisfaction of any debt or obligation, and for drawing, accepting, paying, presenting for acceptance or payment, or indorsing any negotiable instrument or chose in action on behalf of the trust.
Your Social Security Was Made Into a Bond
When the UNITED STATES declared bankruptcy, pledged all Americans as collateral against the national debt, and confiscated all gold, eliminating the means by which you could pay, it also assumed legal responsibility for providing a new way for you to pay, and it did that by providing what is known as the Exemption, an exemption from having to pay for anything. In practical terms, though, this meant giving each American something to pay with, and that “something” is your credit.
Your value to society was then and still is calculated using actuarial tables and at birth, bonds equal to this “average value” are created. I understand that this is currently between one and two million dollars. These bonds are collateralized by your birth certificate which becomes a negotiable instrument. The bonds are hypothecated, traded until their value is unlimited for all intents and purposes, and all that credit created is technically and rightfully yours. In point of fact, you should be able to go into any store in America and buy anything and everything in sight, telling the clerk to charge it to your Exemption account, which is identified by a nine-digit number that you will recognize as your Social Security number without the dashes. It is your EIN, which stands for Exemption Identification Number.
The Cesta QUE Trust
The Cesta Que Trust is an account you inherited due to the bankruptcy of the U.S. in 1933 and the subsequent ceasing of all the citizens gold, silver and other assets as collateral. This account contains millions of dollars in your name. The only problem is that the government and legal system failed to inform you about it and how to access your money. In the meantime, they are drawing down on it for their own personal use and as payment to the Vatican and the English crown.“It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the Elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those Investments.”“Social Security; SSI; SSD; Medicare and Medicaid are all financed by the Trust. The government makes you pay TAXES and a potion of your wages supposedly to pay for these services, which they can borrow at any time for any reason since they cannot access the CESTA QUE TRUST to finance their Wars or to bail out Wall Street and their patron Corporations.”“You may receive a monthly statement from a Mortgage Company; Loan Company or Utility Company, which usually has already been paid by the TRUST. Almost all of these corporate businesses double dip and hope that you have been conditioned well enough by their Credit Scams, to pay them a second time. Instead of paying that Statement next time, sign it approved and mail it back to them. If they then contact you about payment, ask them to send you a TRUE BILL instead of a Statement and you will be glad to pay it? A Statement documents what was due and paid, whereas a TRUE BILL represents only what is due. Banks and Utility Companies have direct access into these Cesta Que Trusts and all they needed was your name; social security number and signature.”Video~Stop the Pitates
-
For the Record
Know your history know your rights
When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand pieces.
As a matter of fact the imagined President, imagined Representatives, imagined Senators, imagined Supreme Court Justices and imagined Federal Judges are not paid by the United States Government. Actually the United States Government does not have any employees They are paid by the International Monetary Fund in electrons. You see there is no such thing as the United States Government. In reality there are no Governments. There are Corporations (Fictions) such as the Federal Reserve Inc., and the United States Inc., which in fact are private corporations. The United States Inc., is just a slave management company. Guess what that makes you? If you said property, you are correct! You are Human Capital. The shares that were issued for the Federal Reserve when it was created back in 1913 only cost $100.00. That was quite the bargain.To verify the facts in the preceding paragraphs see (5 U.S.C. 903, 12 U.S.C. 95, 18 U.S.C.A. 914, 22 U.S.C. 263, 285, 286, 287, 288. Public Law 89-719, Public Law 94-564, Public Law 101-167, Public Law 91-151 Public Law 103-465, House Report 103-826 T.D.O 150-10, T.D.O. 92, 41 Stat. Chap 214 pg. 654, Emergency Banking Act 48 Stat. 1, Articles of Agreement 60 Stat. 1440, 20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2), United Nations Secretariat Revised System of National Accounting, Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Cromelin v. United States, 177 F.2d 275, 277 Tomalewski v. United States, 493 F.Supp 673, 675 Foster v. Bork, 425 F.Supp 1318, 1319-20 FRC v. GE 281 U.S. 464, Keller v. PE 261 U.S. 428, United States v. LePatourel, 571 F2d 405, 410, Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, INTERPOL Constitution Art. 30, Executive Order 10422, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493. 42 Pa.C.S.A. 502. General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs.
When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand pieces. You will have to acknowledge that your entire life has been nothing but a hallucination. You will have to acknowledge that there is NOT, NOR HAS THERE EVER BEEN A GOVERNMENT, COUNTRIES, MONEY, OR CONSTITUTIONS. All GOVERNMENTS AND COUNTRIES ARE FABRICATED FICTIONS CLEVERLY WOVEN INTO YOUR MIND. They are fictions accepted by you because you have been lied to and poisoned your entire life.. What would you do without an external authority commanding you what to do and what not to do? Would you be lost? Could you govern yourself?Let’s see how things got this way.Between the 1860′s and the early 1900′s, banking and taxing mechanisms were changing through legislation. Cunning people closely associated with the powers in England had great influence on the legislation being passed in the United States. Of course such legislation did not apply to the states or to the people in the states, but making the distinction was not deemed to be a necessary duty of the legislators. It was the responsibility of the people to understand their relationship to the United States and to the laws that were being passed by the legislature. This distinction between the United States and the states was taught in the homes and the schools and churches. The early admiralty courts ‘did not interpret legislation as broadly at that time because the people knew when the courts were overstepping their jurisdiction. The people were in control because they knew who they were and where they were standing in relation to the United States Corporation.
In 1913 the United States added numerous private laws to its books that facilitated the increase of subjects (the newly so-called freed slaves from the Civil War) as property of the United States. The 14th Amendment provided for a new class of citizens – United States citizens that had not formerly been recognized. Until the 14th Amendment in 1868, there were no persons born or naturalized in the United States. They had all been born or naturalized in one of the several states. United States citizenship was a result of state citizenship. After the Civil War, a new class was recognized, and was the beginning of the democracy first positioned in the District of Columbia. The American people, in the republic to be found in the several States, could choose to benefit as one of these new United States citizens BY CHOICE. The new class of citizens was given the privilege to vote in the democracy in 1870 by the 15th Amendment. These new citizen subjects were required to apply for marriage, registered to vote, register births, deaths, etc. It all required was an application. Benefits came with this new citizenship, but with the benefits, came duties and responsibilities and liabilities, that were totally regulated by the legislature for the District of Columbia.Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people.(1) The 13th Amendment in 1865 opened the way for the people to volunteer into slavery to accept the benefits offered by the United States. Whether House actually spoke the words or not is really irrelevant because the scenario detailed in the statement attributed to him has clearly been implemented. Central banking for the United States was legislated with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The ability to decrease the currency in circulation through taxation was legislated with the 16th Amendment in 1913. Support for the presumption that the American people had volunteered to participate in the United States democracy was legislated with the 17th Amendment in 1913. The path was provided for the control of the courts by the British Crown, with the creation of the American Bar Association in 1913.In 1917 the United States legislature passed the Trading with the Enemy Act and the Emergency War Powers Act, opening the doors for the United States to suspend limitations otherwise mandated in the Constitution. Even in times of peace, every contrived and created social, political, or financial emergency was sufficient authority for the officers of the United States to overstep its peace time powers and implement volumes of “law” that would increase the coffers of the United States. There is always a declared emergency in the United States and it’s States (administrative units), but it only applies to their subjects.In the 1920′s the States accelerated the push for mothers to register their babies as first required upon the new federal property – the so-called freed Black slaves. Life was good and people were not paying attention to what was happening in government. The stock market crashed, and those who were not on the inside were not warned to take their money out before they lost everything.In the 1930′s federal legislation provided for registration of babies through applications for birth certificates, so government workers could get maternity leave with pay. The States pushed for registration (surrender of ownership) of cars through applications for certificates of title, and for registration of land through registration of deeds of trust, which turned the land over to the State. Constructive trusts secretly were created as each of the people blindly walked into the United States democracy, thereby agreeing to be sureties for the debts of the United States. The great depression supplied the diversion to keep the people’s attention off what government was doing. The Social Security program was implemented, along with numerous other United States programs that invited the American people to volunteer to be the sureties behind the United States’ new registered property and adhesion contracts through the new United States subjects.The plan was well on its path by 1933. Massive registration (surrender) of property through United States agencies, including the ‘State’ subdivisions, was assuring the United States and its officers would get rich beyond their wildest expectations. All of this was done without full disclosure of the material facts that accompanied each application for registration. Is that fraud? The fraud was a sufficient reason to charge all the United States officers with treason, UNLESS a remedy could be supplied for the people to recoup their property and collect for the damages they suffered as a result of the fraud.If a remedy was available, and the people chose not to or failed to use the remedy, no charge of fraud could be sustained even in a common law court. The United States only needed to provide the remedy. It was not required to explain it or even tell the people where the remedy could be found. The attorneys did not even have to be taught about the remedy. That gave them plausible deniability when the people struggled to understand the new laws. The legislators did not have to have the intricate details of the law explained to them regarding the bills they were passing. That gave them plausible deniability. If the people failed to use their remedy, the United States came out the winner every time. If the people did discover their remedy, the United States had to honor it and release the registered property back to the people, but only if the people knew they had a remedy, and only if they requested it in the proper manner. It was a great plan.With plausible deniability, even when the people knew they had a remedy and pursued it, the attorneys, judges, and legislators could act like they did not understand the people’s claims. Requiring the public schools to teach civics, government, and history classes out of approved politically correct text books also assured the people would not find the remedy for a very long time. Passing new State and Federal laws that appeared to subject the people to rules and regulations, added another level of protection against the people finding their remedy. The public ‘socialist media’ was molded to report politically correct, though substantially incorrect news day after day, until few people would even think there could be a remedy available to them. The people could be separated from their money and their time to pursue the remedy long enough for the solutions to be lost in the millions of pages of the books in huge law libraries across the country. So many people knew there was something wrong with all the conflicts in the laws with the “facts” taught in the government schools. How’ can the American people be free and subject to a de-facto government’s whims at the same time? Who would ever have thought the people would be resourceful enough to actually find the remedy? BUT they did!In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy into place with House Joint Resolution 192 and recorded it in the Congressional Record. It was not required to be promulgated in the Federal Register. An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933 paving the way for the withdrawal of gold in the United States. Representative Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges on May 23, 1933 against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary of the United States Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page 4055-4058). HJR 192 passed on June 3, 1933. Mr. McFadden claimed on June 10, 1933:
“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks…”
HJR 192 is the insurance policy that protects the legislators from conviction for fraud and treason against the American people. It also protects the American people from damages caused by the actions of the United States. For speaking like he did, Mr. McFadden was poisoned by the powers that be by agents of that federal corporation.
HJR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the bills. It removed the requirement that the United States subjects and employees had to pay their debts with gold. It actually prohibited the inclusion of a clause in all subsequent contracts that would require payment in gold. It also cancelled the clause in every contract written prior to June 5, 1933, that required an obligation to be paid in gold – retroactively. It provided that the United States subjects and employees could use any type of coin and currency to discharge a public debt as long as it was in use in the normal course of business in the United States. For a time, United States Notes were the currency used to discharge debts, but later the Federal Reserve and the United States provided a new medium of exchange through paper notes, and debt instruments that could be passed on to a debtor’s creditors to discharge the debtor’s debts. That same currency, Federal Reserve Notes, is used to discharge public debts. Take note; the Federal Reserve Notes have no value, as stated by the Federal Reserve!In the 1950′s the Uniform Commercial Code was presented to their States as a means of unifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial transactions and fictions as though they were real. Security instruments (commercial paper) replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be supported by presumptive contracts. Debt instruments with collateral, and accommodating parties, could be used instead of money. Money (of exchange) and the need for money was disappearing, and NEW money was being created i.e., ‘Money of Account’ (created by Bill of Exchange) and a uniform system of laws had to be put in place to allow the commercial venue and the courts to uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance (see ‘Tender of Payment in your State statute!). All this was accomplished by the mid 1960′s. And by 1964, most all the States had adopted the Uniform Commercial Code.The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and required procedures all people engaged in commercial activities must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled thousands of years ago, but were refined and became more sophisticated over the years. In the 1900′s the age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became a big part of the law. Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new direction in enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in their courts. If the claimants were required to produce their claims every time they tried to collect money or time from the people, they would seldom be successful. The principles expressed in the code combined the means of dealing with substantive commercial activities with the means of dealing with presumptive commercial activities. These principles work as well for the people as they do for the deceivers. The rules do not respect persons.
Those who enticed the people to register (surrender) their property (land, cars, guns, children, etc.) to the sub-divisions (States) under dictate by the United States, gained control of the substance through the ‘registrations’ and the States were able to extract more ‘use’ taxes, from the people to use the property of the State! The States and the United States became the Holder of the titles to all the property, even children and many other things.The definition of “property” is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the principal. The property is the interest in the thing. Profits (interest) made from the property of another belong to the owner of the thing. Profits were made by the deceivers by pledging the registered property in commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers. The profits belong to the owners of the ‘things.’ That is always the people. The corporation only shows ownership of paper – titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. [Watch the movie Last Action Hero and watch the confusion created when they try to mix substance and fiction.] Sometimes the fiction is made to look very much like substance, but fiction can never become substance. It is an impossibility!
The profits from all the registered things had to be put into a ‘constructive’ trust for the benefit of the owners. If the profits were put into the general fund of the United States and not into separate trusts for the owners, the scheme would represent fraud. The profits for each owner could not be commingled. If the owner failed to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit from the profits, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. If the owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his remedy, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. The owner is responsible for learning the law, so he understands that the profits from his things are available for him to discharge debts or charges brought against his public person (Debtor-straw-man) by the United States.If the United States has the “gold”, the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund, or financial ledger). The definition of “fund” is money set aside to pay a debt. The fund is there to discharge the public debts attributed to the United States subjects, but ultimately back to the accommodating parties – the American people. The national debt is what is owed to the owners of the registered things – the American people, as well as to other creditors!
If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the thing, and the owner is presumed (by accommodation) to owe a public debt to the United States, the logical thing is to ask the United States to discharge that public debt from the trust fund. The way for the United States to get around having to pay the public debts for the people is to claim the owner cannot be an owner if he agreed to be the accommodating party for a debtor-person. If the people are truly the principle, then they know how to handle their financial and political affairs, ULNESS they have never been taught. If the owner admits by his actions out of ignorance, that he is an accommodating party, he has taken on the debtor’s- liabilities without getting consideration in exchange. Here lies the fiction again. The owner of the thing does not have to knowingly agree to be the accommodating party for the debtor person; he just has to act like he agreed. That is easy if he has a choice of going to jail or signing for the debtor-person. The presumption that he is the accommodating party is strong enough for the courts to hold the owner of the thing liable for a tax on the thing he actually owns or owes.Debtors may have the ‘use’ of certain things, but the things belong to the creditors. The creditor is the master. The debtor is the servant. The Uniform Commercial Code is very specific about the duties and responsibilities a debtor has. If the owner of the thing is presumed to be a debtor because of his previous admissions and adhesion contracts, he is going to have a difficult time convincing the United States that it has a duty to discharge public debts for him. In addition, the courts are staffed with loyal judges who will look for every mistake the people make, when trying to use their remedy.Now the quasi-owner (user) of the property (thing), after learning the law and discovering who he is in relation to the United States Corporation, can file a UCC Financing Statement based upon a Security Agreement, registering his security interest in the artificial entity DEBTOR/PERSON, being the ENS LEGIS which the United States created after your Mom signed the ‘Root of Title/Newborn Identification’ and then was compelled to apply for a birth certificate. That was the act of registering her biological property, her baby (substance), with the State of ____. The United States holds the paper title (form), not the substance (baby). Until your Financing Statement is filed, the United States is the holder of the title to the artificial entity. Its name is spelled in all capital letter – JOHN HENRY DOE. When John Henry Doe files the Financing Statement supported by a Security Agreement signed by the artificial entity (JOHN) and the owner (John), he becomes the holder in due course of the title to JOHN. The UCC and the State commercial law are very specific about the effect of a registered security interest. It has priority over most other interest claimed (only claimed) in the same thing. The evidence that is missing in the court is the registered claim over the person (JOHN).The owner also must notify the Secretary of the Treasury that he is going to handle his own affairs in the future. That is done when you do the CHARGE BACK PROCESS by filing a Bill of Exchange with the Secretary through which he ‘charges up the UCC Contract Trust Account,’ in respect to the ‘value’ expressed on the Birth Certificate and the ‘Directive’ cover letter. The social security number, belonging to your Debtor, is the Trust Account Number for a chargeback, for all the presumed charges brought against your Debtor for proper discharge.Think of the whole transaction in relation to a dead battery. The batter represents your public person (JOHN), which is a dead entity that can function within the public maize of fiction, transmitting benefits from the public to you in the private IF it is charged up. You cannot go into the public because you are not a fiction. JOHN has no power until it is charged with some energy. That energy comes from an IRS default notice, court judgment, credit card bill, utility bill, traffic ticket, or some other instrument that has a $ amount and JOHN’S name on it as the presumed debtor. The bill is the energy. It charges the dead JOHN. You can now discharge JOHN and put JOHN’S accrual account with the charging party back to a zero balance. You as the secured party creditor, having charged up the UCC Contract Trust Account, now for the ‘presentment’ received in behalf of a debt owed by JOHN, you can discharge the fine, fee, tax or debt with a negotiable instrument for the same $ amount as the charging instrument (presentment) stipulates. The charging party that receives your non-cash item can process it back through the United States Treasury through their financial institution. Note; if discharging IRS Tax liability, the package/instrument goes directly to the Secretary of Treasury – U.S.When you, as the owner of a thing, registered it with the United States or one of its subdivisions, you let the United States hold the legal title to your thing based on misrepresentation and failure to disclose material facts to you at the time of registration. You probably retained possession of the thing, but the United States/States invested the title and made a profit. If you did not specifically authorize the United States/State and its agents to invest the legal title, the profits made from that title belong to you, because as the owner, you remain the equitable title holder. Legally, all the profits from the investment of the titles to all your registered things must go into a fund for your benefit. If they did not put the profits in a trust fund of some sort, it would be fraud.Just acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory registration, is fraud. If the scenario attributed to Mandell House is now in full application in the United States, which it is, the officers of the United States could be charged and convicted with treason IF they had not provided a remedy, which they did. — House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933. This is their insurance policy to assure they are not convicted of treason. That does not mean they cannot be charged with treason, but the courts will dismiss based on failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because you have a remedy outside the court, you cannot sustain a charge of treason. But Tort, now that’s another matter! We will discuss Tort Claims later!~stop the piratesEducational VIDEO -
Apostolic Letter
You want to have a copy of this letter and keep it in a secure place, as The Most Holy Francis issued this Apostolic Letter to go worldwide. Taking effect immediately as of September 1 of 2013 everyone that is under The Roman Curia Law will be subject to undeniable crimes against humanity if they are not following Common law regulations! Now this is monumental because the Circuit Courts, judges, lawyers, banking system, and all Corporations in this world are established under the Curia Law!!
This will give the local Sheriff and police officers in your community the opportunity to never again stop and harass you on your way to work when he/she claimed that you were speeding so with their manipulations they will have you pay a fine, or should we say Doubled fines because once you showed them your ID they would charge it to your ‘Treasury Account” as well, (your driver license is a combination of your birth certificate and social security number). Is that deceiving or what? All this time it has been nothing more than a fraud against the people with their wars, security concerns bullshit, and whatever means of control you can think off.
We can imagine that after September 1 no one will be willing to write their names anywhere because they’ll know that THE PEOPLE will be going after their ass when doing something harmful to others. This will be the time when everyone has no choice but to start being responsible, accountable, transparent and liable for his or her own actions.
On the bottom you have the link to the original letter
Much more coming up people! Are you ready to have FUN!
APOSTOLIC LETTERISSUED MOTU PROPRIOOF THE SUPREME PONTIFFFRANCISON THE JURISDICTION OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES OF VATICAN CITY STATEIN CRIMINAL MATTERSIn our times, the common good is increasingly threatened by transnational organized crime, the improper use of the markets and of the economy, as well as by terrorism.
It is therefore necessary for the international community to adopt adequate legal instruments to prevent and counter criminal activities, by promoting international judicial cooperation on criminal matters.
In ratifying numerous international conventions in these areas, and acting also on behalf of Vatican City State, the Holy See has constantly maintained that such agreements are effective means to prevent criminal activities that threaten human dignity, the common good and peace.
With a view to renewing the Apostolic See’s commitment to cooperate to these ends, by means of this Apostolic Letter issued Motu Proprio, I establish that:
1. The competent Judicial Authorities of Vatican City State shall also exercise penal jurisdiction over:
a) crimes committed against the security, the fundamental interests or the patrimony of the Holy See;
b) crimes referred to:
– in Vatican City State Law No. VIII, of 11 July 2013, containing Supplementary Norms on Criminal Law Matters;
– in Vatican City State Law No. IX, of 11 July 2013, containing Amendments to the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code; when such crimes are committed by the persons referred to in paragraph 3 below, in the exercise of their functions;c) any other crime whose prosecution is required by an international agreement ratified by the Holy See, if the perpetrator is physically present in the territory of Vatican City State and has not been extradited.
2. The crimes referred to in paragraph 1 are to be judged pursuant to the criminal law in force in Vatican City State at the time of their commission, without prejudice to the general principles of the legal system on the temporal application of criminal laws.
3. For the purposes of Vatican criminal law, the following persons are deemed “public officials”:
a) members, officials and personnel of the various organs of the Roman Curia and of the Institutions connected to it.b) papal legates and diplomatic personnel of the Holy See.
c) those persons who serve as representatives, managers or directors, as well as persons who even de facto manage or exercise control over the entities directly dependent on the Holy See and listed in the registry of canonical juridical persons kept by the Governorate of Vatican City State;
d) any other person holding an administrative or judicial mandate in the Holy See, permanent or temporary, paid or unpaid, irrespective of that person’s seniority.
4. The jurisdiction referred to in paragraph 1 comprises also the administrative liability of juridical persons arising from crimes, as regulated by Vatican City State laws.
5. When the same matters are prosecuted in other States, the provisions in force in Vatican City State on concurrent jurisdiction shall apply.
6. The content of article 23 of Law No. CXIX of 21 November 1987, which approves the Judicial Order of Vatican City State remains in force.
This I decide and establish, anything to the contrary notwithstanding.
I establish that this Apostolic Letter issued Motu Proprio will be promulgated by its publication in L’Osservatore Romano, entering into force on 1 September 2013.
Given in Rome, at the Apostolic Palace, on 11 July 2013, the first of my Pontificate.
FRANCISCUS -
TOP THINGS THE POLICE DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW
Did you know that if you sue for false arrest (or false imprisonment), the arrest is presumed to be false?Did you know that all you need to prove is that the arrest occurred, and then the burden is on the officer to prove that it wasn’t false?
Did you know that for an imprisonment, all you need is to show that you were “restrained of your liberty by words and acts which you feared to disregard”?
Did you know that a car stop counts as an arrest and an imprisonment?
Did you know that if an officer says he has a warrant for your arrest, you can demand to see the warrant AND the supporting affidavit, and if he arrests you without producing them, it’s a false arrest?
Did you know that the police routinely ignore and violate this law?
Did you know that “sovereign immunity” only covers “discretionary” acts (where the officer has a choice about what to do) but does not cover “ministerial” acts such as executing an arrest warrant?
Do you understand that an officer is personally liable for any misdeeds during a warrant arrest?
Did you know that sovereign immunity does not cover an officer AT ALL if he breaks the law?
Did you know that many court documents are “signed” with a rubber stamp?
Did you know that many clerks and attorneys have these stamps with a judge’s signature?
How do you know the warrant wasn’t stamped by a clerk or attorney?
How can a rubber-stamp signature on a warrant POSSIBLY be legal?Did you know that you can ask an officer for his business card and ID, and if he doesn’t comply, he’s out of uniform?
Did you know you have the right to resist a false arrest with as much force as necessary?
Did you know that if an officer misbehaves, you can complain to Risk Management?
Did you know that the Federal Pure Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act (that set up the FDA) makes it illegal for anyone but a licensed physician to operate a breathalyzer?Did you know that if an officer asks you a question, you have the right to ignore him and keep walking?
TOP QUESTIONS TO ASK AN FBI AGENT
Are you a “Special Agent” ?
Are there any “General Agents” in the FBI?
When you tell me you are a “Special Agent,” are you telling me that you have only specific, limited authority, and that I am responsible for finding out what the limits to your authority are? Am I responsible for making sure you stay within the limits of your authority, even if you are unaware of what those limits are? Please show me documentation of your authority. Is it true that the authority of an FBI agent is the same as the authority of a Park Ranger?
Did you swear an “Oath of Office” ?
Please show me a copy of it. If you violate your Oath of Office, what are the consequences to you? How are those consequences enforced? Do I have to complain to your superiors, or sue you, or what? What is the name of your superior? What is your badge number? Are you authorized to use an alias? How can I serve process on you if I don’t know your real name?
When you took office, did you file a bond? Is there any liability insurance to cover damage that you cause while on duty?
Please show me a copy of the insurance policy.
Are you here on campus as an “invitee” or as a “licensee” ? How does that affect the liability of the Trustees if you are injured while here? How does that affect the liability of the Trustees if you cause damage? Which program are you here under: Applicant, Civil Rights, Counterterrorism, Financial Crime, Foreign Counterintelligence, Organized Crime/Drug, or Violent Crimes and Major Offenders?
Is it true that if you arrest me, and I sue you for false arrest (also false imprisonment, assault, battery, and kidnapping), the only thing I need to prove is that an arrest occurred, and then the burden is on you to show that it wasn’t false? Would I sue you in State or Federal court? Why? Is it true that “imprisonment” includes “restraining me of my liberty by words and acts which I fear to disregard” ? Is it true that you can conduct a warrantless arrest only if you witness a felony or a breach of the peace, the same as any citizen? Please show me documentation of any other powers of arrest.
What is the Constitutional authority for the FBI to exist? Is it true that the “police power” means the power to protect the health, safety, morals, and welfare of the public? Is it true that the police powers are reserved to the States under the 10th Amendment? How can you call yourself “law enforcement” if you’re not exercising the police power? Is it true that the only Federal crimes (under Article I of the Constitution) are counterfeiting, piracy and treason? If you’re not exercising police powers, and you’re not a standing army, then what are you?
Is it true that Congress technically ceased to exist during the Civil War, by adjourning “sine die” (“without day”)? Is this the reason that Congress has not used the Constitutionally mandated procedure for admitting any States to the Union since 1859?
Is this the reason Senators and Representatives are not actually sworn in during “swearing-in” ceremonies? Is this the reason the President calls the Congress into session every two years? Why two years? Is it because the salaries of Congress fall under the two-year limit on military appropriations?
Are there geographical limits to your authority? Please show me documentation of those limits. Are you authorized to operate in one of the 10 Federal “Regions” ? What is the Constitutional authority for the Nixon-era creation of those “Regions” ? How can the Federal government create “Regions” if it is forbidden to create States? Was it done through emergency or martial-law powers? Isn’t “Region” a military word?
Do you have any reason to believe that any of us are engaging in interstate commerce?
Do you know that any mention of the “interstate commerce clause” in any court, by the Prosecution or the Plaintiff, brings the Constitution into evidence and I am free to use it OR object on the grounds that the Constitution has not been entered into evidence.
Do you know Lon Horiuchi, who shot Vicki Weaver while she was holding a baby in her arms (in the infamous Ruby Ridge incident), all over a shotgun that was a quarter of an inch too short? Do you know the agent who shot 14-year-old Sammy Weaver in the back as he tried to run home?
Did you have any part in the Waco massacre (in which the FBI used CS gas and its flammable propellant, in a surprise attack with no element of surprise)? Isn’t CS gas illegal to use in war? Did you help destroy evidence from Waco? Is it true that the U.S. Marshals Service falsely claimed a possible drug problem with the Weavers at Ruby Ridge in order to get military reconnaissance flights over the cabin? (and the “hot spot” from the alleged drug lab turned out to be a doghouse?) And that the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms invented a phony drug nexus at Waco in order to obtain massive assistance from the U.S. Army, the Texas National Guard, and the Alabama National Guard? Is it true that civilian agencies routinely obtain free military support by lying about drugs, and because there is no sanction for lying, obvious falsehoods are accepted by the military as a pretext for intervention? Is it true that the infamous FBI Hostage Rescue Team has spent considerable time in recent years holding hostages and has not even attempted to rescue a hostage for several years? Why are there 56 FBI SWAT teams and what’s that got to do with investigation?
Is it true that almost the entire Waco operation, not only 2/28 but the siege, had been improperly financed from money that law enforcement was supposed to use only in the war on drugs?
Have you had any military training? Are you connected in any way to military intelligence? How come you’re not covered by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which was passed to outlaw the use of federal troops for civilian law enforcement and which made it a felony to willfully use “any part of the Army . . . to execute the laws” ?
Is it true that during the 1930s J. Edgar Hoover, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, falsely told the American people that an unprecedented wave of child kidnappings was in progress, and the FBI was rewarded with substantial attention and funding, and in the 1980s a very different FBI earned itself more funding by putting out phony claims about a wave of serial killers of children?
Is it really a federal crime to transport artificial teeth into a state without the approval of a local licensed dentist, with penalty of up to one year in prison? Is this the sort of thing we pay the FBI to investigate?
Is it true that the federal courts have virtually taken over such vital state functions as the operation of prisons and mental hospitals? And that by 1993, the federal courts operated 80 percent of all state prison systems in America? Is it true that federal judges determine virtually every detail of these prisons, including standards for food and clothing, grievance procedures, and cell space per convict? Is it true that these prisons are run by private corporations for profit?
TOP THINGS THE BANKS DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW
Did you know that the FDIC doesn’t really insure bank accounts?
Did you know that when a bank goes under and is taken over by the FDIC, instead of paying the $100,000, the FDIC just pays its own people to come into the bank and divvy up what’s left of the bank’s assets? (This comes from a woman who once worked as a temp for the FDIC. Her job was to talk on the phone to the angry depositors and explain this to them.)
Did you know that a bank cannot legally require a fingerprint as a condition of cashing a check?
According to UCC 3-501(b)(2), they can only require you to:
Exhibit the instrument (i.e. you show them the check)
Give reasonable identification, and evidence of your authority if you are cashing the check on behalf of someone else.Sign the check, and make a written receipt for partial payment, or the surrender of the check upon full payment (i.e. you let them keep the check) They write the brochures to say that they “ask” for a fingerprint (not “demand” as a condition of payment).
Their excuse for the fingerprint is “reasonable identification.” So if you can get them to agree that your picture ID is reasonable identification, they have NO LAWFUL EXCUSE for refusing to pay the check just because you don’t give them a fingerprint! In this case they have “dishonored” the check and you can proceed exactly as you would if they blatantly, and for no reason, refused to pay. Contact us for ideas on how to use the fingerprint issue.
Did you know that if you write “Without Recourse” below your endorsement or signature that the bank can not take any action against you for any reason!
Did you know that banks do not loan their own assets, nor the assets of their depositors?
Do you realize this means they do NOT loan money, but instead, there is an exchange of credit for credit, in which interest is charged on one side, but not the other?
If the borrower walks away with cash (which has value in the form of “purchasing power”), but the bank didn’t loan any of its assets, isn’t it obvious that the “purchasing power” must have come from SOMEWHERE?Did you know that when a bank makes a “loan,” the money supply (M1) expands — in other words, the volume of currency in circulation increases?
Did you know that the value of the Federal Reserve Note “dollar” depends on the size of the money supply via the law of “supply and demand” — in other words, the more FRNs there are, the less they are worth?
Do you understand that when the bank makes a loan, the value of the FRN “dollar bills” in everybody’s pocket declines — in other words, the bank is creating FRN dollars in competition with the FRN “dollars” in your pocket, and this reduces the value of the FRN “dollars” in your pocket? Do you realize this is the cause of inflation?
Do you realize that this means the “value,” or “purchasing power,” loaned by the bank is essentially STOLEN from the public via the mechanism of inflation? Contact us for ideas on how to use the “Theft by Inflation” issue
1. Always Pursue Truth – unless something better comes along.
2. There is No Deception so great as– Self-deception, see # 1.Never talk to a Police video
~Stop the Pirates
-
What is “Accepted For Value” Process?
What is “Accepted For Value” (A4V) Mean Using The Strawman Redemption (UCC)! What Is The Accepted For Value Process?
What Is Meant By Accepted for Value (A4V)
What is Accepted for Value? The words are making their way across the Internet, but what it actually means is a little obscure. To make it simple, Acceptance for Value is a commercial remedy. What exactly is a remedy? Simple explanation is that a remedy is a commercial right that is acquired through a commercial instrument. For example, any tickets, tax bills,etc…
Accepted for value is an authorized signature on a commercial instrument. Leaving the instrument without an endorsement ( your signature or non-acquiescence) relinquishes remedies that are offered through the instrument by renouncing defects in the instrument.
Acceptance: Is an agreement by a specific act or by incrimination from behaviour, to the terms of an offer which will form a binding contract. If an Acceptance alters the terms or affixes new ones, this is treated as a counter offer.
Acceptance: The taking and receiving of a thing in good part, as if it were an inferred agreement to a prior act, which might have been vanquished or circumvented if such Acceptance was not made.
The Illusion Of Money
Money is based on the time, energy , and labor of a human being.UCC 1-201
When there is an instrument resulting from an agreement that has already pre-existed as an agreement or contract, then it would not have to be dispensed for value. The issuer’s safeguards are in the contract.
If the contract of the person who receives the instrument is a U.S. citizen who has received a violation ticket it is not carried out to the fulfillment of the transferor, the person can authenticate the claim with that contract.
If a pre-existing contract does not exist, then the instrument must be issued for value. Issued for value means the same exact thing as issued to receive value. The instrument in itself has no value what so ever when it is issued, it is issued to try and receive value.
It is pursuing a person to agree to accept the offer entirely, which would waive any remedy available. Whenever you receive a bill to collect taxes, or any disciplinary indictments, the assumption of the basis for the issuance of the instrument itself violates U.S. statute.
When neither a contract or a verbal agreement is not involved to act under those statutes, there is no compulsion to pay. All a person needs to do is apply a qualified endorsement (A4V) to the instrument, that will factually turn that instrument into the payment.
The transferee receives a security interest in the instrument and becomes the actual holder in time. The responsibility is retained by the issuer, instead of it being allocated to you. In this situation, you can impose the instrument back to the issuer. Then they would become the transferee.
UCC 1-201. General definitions
44. “Value”. Except as otherwise provided with respect to negotiable instruments and bank collections (sections 3-303, 4-210, 4-211) a person gives “value” for rights if he quires them:
(a) In return for a binding commitment to extend credit or for the extension of immediately available credit whether or not drawn upon and whether or not a charge-back is provided for in the event of difficulties in collection; or
(b) As security for in total or partial satisfaction of a preexisting claim; or
(c) By accepting delivery pursuant to a preexisting contract for purchase; or
(d) Generally, in return for any consideration sufficient to support a simple contract.
1-201 reads that a person must give value to receive rights. If one party is providing value then the other is requested to provide rights in exchange.
Accepted For Value Winston Shrout
Accepted For Value Winston Shrout 2
Contracts And Promises
If a contract or a promise that is verbal or unspoken, then that agreement cannot really be imposed. Any instrument that is requiring implementation on it is commonly nothing but an offer to create a new contract. If you put your signature on the instrument, you have accepted the terms of the new contract. In this situation it is your responsibility to pay the debt.
Whenever an issuer creates an instrument for value and issues it, he is risking the legal responsibility on it. If you challenge the instrument the issuer may be responsible for paying you.
You are in a superior position if the issuer of the instrument does not make a counter offer to your offer. Commerce is set up to favor creditors that are seeking to collect on claims. Commerce is based on Merchant Law.
Most of the time the only thing that needs to be determined is who is the creditor and who owes the debt? Once that has been determined (Ex. you sign a ticket with signature) any other facts regarding the claim is unrelated.
Acceptance for Value authenticates you as the creditor.
Value For Rights
Your signature creates money!UCC 1-201
If you look at UCC 1-201subsection (a), here are some examples of the exchange of value for rights.
Excluding 3-303, 4-210, 4-211, a person gives value for rights if he gains them:
(a) In return for a binding commitment to extend credit or for the extension of immediately available credit whether or not drawn upon and whether or not a charge-back is provided for in the event of difficulties in collection.
-A person (borrower) gives value (right to foreclose)(asset on the bank’s books) for rights (use of public credit) if he gets those rights in return for a commitment to extend credit (promissory note).
-A person (lender aka creditor) gives value (use of public credit) for rights(to foreclose) if he gets those rights in return for a commitment to extend (public) credit (to a borrower aka debtor)
That is in the public.
-A person (borrower) gives value (private man’s credit via signature on a note) for rights (use of currency) if he gets those rights in return for a commitment to extend credit. (his private credit to the lender)
-A person (lender aka debtor) gives value (liability on its books) for rights (use of man’s private credit) if he gets those rights in return for his commitment to extend (public) credit (to the debtor)
That is from private to public.
Modern Money Mechanics
Where does money come from?
The first thing to understand about money is what it is, and how it was created. Money is not exactly by means of definition, money. Money is based on credit which means that money in reality is not an object of value, money is debt.
The creation of money is the ability to get a human to agree to repay the money. Money is not produced out of thin air, there is a need for someone to acquire the debt from credit that has been issued.
Money needs the force of a human to provide a signature for it before it is created, it is the signature that retains the value. This can be proved as fact simply by the reality that a bank cannot issue its own credit.
This is where the term extension in the financial markets is derived. The bank is extending the credit from another human to the receiving party. This is not a loan, it is an allowance from a previous activity.
The credit is available through the private human to the public bank and then it goes back to the U.S. Citizens which becomes a public borrower. The human is unable to enter into the public because he is a living, breathing, physical human being. In order to operate in the public the human needs a U.S. citizen to stand for him in the public domain.
All that is required from the U.S. citizen is to have a human sign the instruments, so in fact it is the human that must represent the citizen and furnish his bodily strength by his signature.
The human would be supposed to be a compliant and willing party without obtaining any rights, without agreeing to terms that would be beneficial to him. If he applies his signature without determining new terms then he will not gain any rights in reimbursement for the value that he provided, which was the extension of his credit.
If an instrument is issued for value without having a written contract to support it is nothing but a demand for a man’s credit. They are nothing but applications for credit, they need you the human being for money. If he signs the document correctly, he will become the creditor.
Meet Your Strawman!
Public Person
What is meant by my “Public Person”? (Strawman)
A person (Citizen of the United States) exchanges value for rights ( your birth certificate equates to an authorized security interest) in return for his pledge to broaden public credit and benefits to the Citizen of the United States.
A United States Citizen (person) gives a guarantee to the United States for the right to conduct commerce within the United States, if he accepts those rights in trade for his assurance to extend public credit, and to become collateral for the debt of the United States. Which is a public to public agreement.
A United States citizen (person) trades value (A humans private credit to the United States) for the right to engage in commerce in the United States. He receives those rights by committing his human being to extend credit to the Government created Strawman (United States Citizen).
When you apply “Accepted For Value”, you are invoking your rights as the recipient of the Trust created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933 under the Constitution. This Right exists due to the Constitutional Oath taken by the President when he is inaugurated.
Sen. Scott Brown Takes Oath Of Office!
Oath Of Office.
Judges as well as all other Federal employees have to take the Oath required by 5 USC § 3331.
“An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services shall take the following oath:
‘I, Their Name, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.’”
There is quite a difference between an Oath and an Oath of Office!
As long as there remains an Officer which has taken the Oath required by the Constitution then the people will retain a Trustee for the Trust of which they are the recipient. The people hold an precursor to the claim from an already existing contract. A contract which is founded on Constitutional Guarantees.
The remedy to this is the Certificate of Birth.
It represents the precursor to the claim you hold against the United States. It is also all the evidence you need that a contract is already existent. It exemplifies your pre-paid account that you have available to discharge debt.
What is Acceptance?
You can imply acceptance simply by remaining silent. It can be construed that you have accepted an offer, even though it was not presented in obvious words. Simply because the person that the offer is being made to does not respond to the offer. Especially in a state of affairs that the person making the offer as well as the person receiving the offer validates the offerer’s belief of a reply, the offerer’s practical conclusion that the lack of a response equates to an acceptance of the offer.
Silence would not normally be construed as acceptence of an offer, when the offeree has a duty to speak and does not do so, then this is realized as acceptence. If you behave like you are a citizen of the US in your communications, you will have no obligation to respond.
Instead, if you act like you are a true beneficiary on the trusts created by the Constitution through the actions of FDR, they do and due to their silence it is also considered acceptance.
Your interaction should transfer the terms of the contract to another party, a party that has a Delegation of Authority to be a representative of the United States.
The President can coerce the US, the President has agents that have the ability to do it for him. These three agents head the executive departments of Homeland Security, Treasury, and Justice.
The banker for the United States is the Secretary of the Treasury and should be the one that receives the endorsed instrument. Once it gets there it will be treated as a check and deposited in order to reconcile an account.
Whenever you A4V, you actually become the holder of the instrument eventually. Once this is accomplished you have the power to enforce the instrument upon the issuer.
This will give him the duty to pay as long as it issued for value and only if this is recognized and has been endorsed properly.
To become the holder in due course, then the holder must meet all the fundamentals in 3-302.
3-302 Holder in Due Course
A. Subject to subsection C of this section and section 3-106, subsection D, “holder in due course” means the holder of an instrument if:
1. The instrument when issued or negotiated to the holder does not bear such apparent evidence of forgery or alteration or is not otherwise so irregular or incomplete as to call into question its authenticity; and
2. The holder took the instrument
a) for value
b) in good faith
c) without notice that the instrument is overdue or has been dishonored or that there is an uncured default with respect to payment of another instrument issued as part of the same series;
d) without notice that the instrument contains an unauthorized signature or has been altered;
e) without notice of any claim to the instrument described in section 3-306; and
f) without notice that any party has a defense or claim in recoupment described in section 3-305, subsection A.
Winston Shrout New A4V update
UCC 3-303
Official Comment
“If an instrument is not issued for consideration the issuer has a defense to the obligation to pay the instrument.”
If you consider the converse of that statement then, If an instrument has been issued for consideration, the issuer does not have a defense to the responsibility to pay the instrument.
Refusal for Cause
Overall, it would be better to A4V every single instrument you receive rather than refusing for cause any instruments at all.
For many reasons.
When you Refuse for Cause, you are actually refusing to accept the instrument due to flaws in the instrument.
If you Refuse For Cause you will have to be quite knowledgeable of statutes codes etc… This is not something that the majority of people have the time or desire to learn. This is especially detrimental to those of us who are Freemen On The Land.
It will also be a requirement that the transferee deals with the specific defects. You will need to have the ability to think quickly on your feet in the courtroom.
This can become a very intricate issue when you can simply A4V. When you Accept For Value you are actually helping the country by accepting all their offers to you rather then simply refusing them.
In reality you will be helping them during a time of emergency (bankruptcy) by diminishing the National Debt.
ACCEPTED FOR VALUE SUCCESS!
Without Recourse!
Definition of “Without Recourse”: An individual who endorses a check or promissory note using the phrasewithout recourse specifically declines to accept any responsibility for payment.
If you add the term Without Recourse to your signature it creates another authorized validation. It will remove the guarantor out of the calculation. This will remove all liabilities the backer may have had on the instrument.
When you use this kind of endorsement, you are not a willing or responsible party. Generally when using the Accepted for Value, it would be better for you if you did not use this action so you can be perceived as an assistant to the United States.
You will be accepting responsibility in the agreement and will be viewed as an ally.
Suretyship?
Definition of Suretyship: One who has contracted to be responsible for another, especially one who assumes responsibilities or debts in the event of default.
All Citizens of the United States are assumed to have entered into an agreement to be the Surety for the reimbursement of the National Debt. It is a better position to be a Surety then it is being an accommodating party, that gives all its credit as well as its name and gets nothing in return.
A Surety will receive a benefit for their agreement to be a Surety.
An example of Suretyship.
A police Officer needs two sureties before he can fulfill his official duties.
He finds two people that have agreed to be his sureties, They would then sign a document (bond) as surety for the officer.
The officer would then give the sureties something of value such as a deed of trust, to be used as a security for them in case it would be required of them to repay a debt incurred by the officer.
If the officer held the position of a tax collector, and became deceased, all of the accounts he held would have to be settled.
If there was not enough money in his accounts to repay the taxes that he had collected, any personal property that he held would be used to reconcile the debt.
The United States and its creditors will not take the time or money to liquidate the personal property belonging to the dead officer. They will however look to the sureties to collect the debt.
The sureties are obligated to repay the debt at once!
The sureties will become the holders of the Deed Of Trust in due course and they will attain the right to enforce the deed.
They will have the ability to liquidate the real property that is connected to the Deed of Trust, in this way they will be compensated.
The heirs of the dead officer has no claim to the person’s property, this is because the Deed of Trust that the sureties retain is an enforceable instrument.
A Suretey for the United States will have the same options available to them.
Considering that the sureties are mere fictions, the people who are used to symbolize those sureties can choose to apply their pre-paid account to pay those instruments that they receive and are issued and transferred for value.
They are not required to pay with their Public Deeds, their Accounts, or from cash from the persons they represent.
If they pay with a public currency, they have every right to be compensated. If they choose to use the pre-paid account, they go through the Secretary of the Treasury to settle the debt.
Which ever way it is done the surety stays in honor and behaves corresponding with his promise.
Summary!
A Trust was created by the Constitution, and one was created by Roosevelt in 1933 when he had all the Gold and Silver confiscated.
It is the people who are the true recipients of these Trusts, if they correctly acknowledge their Birth Certificates.
Accepted for Value (A4V) will confirm your place as “Holder in Due Course”, transferor, enforcer of the instrument and the true recipients of those Trusts.
A4V (Accepted for Value) is an authorized certification, you will receive a security interest in the instrument.
Any instrument that is not backed by an premeditated written obligation to pay or perform must be issued for value.
The issuer of the instrument ultimately is the one that holds the liability on the instrument.
Unless an instrument issued for value has been endorsed it has no actual value.
Any instrument that is issued or has been transferred for value is:
- a promise of performance, to the level that the promise has been performed.
- to obtain a Security Interest or other Lien in the instrument, without having to obtain said lien through the proper Judicial Proceedings.
- To be used as payment, or to be used as security for a previous claim against any person, if the actual claim is due or not.
- To be substituted for a negotiable instrument.
- As a substitute for the burdening of an irreversible obligation to a third party by the person accepting the instrument.
Disclaimer
The materials available on this hub are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. All materiel are copyrighted properties of the author and may not be used without permission of the author.
~HUbPages
On this letter a customer had his phone paid with his A4V treasury account!
-
We Wonder Why HSBC Bank is Clossing Diplomatic Accounts?
HSBC bank has reportedly asked more than 40 diplomatic missions to close their accounts as part of a programme to reduce business risks.The Vatican’s ambassadorial office in Britain, the Apostolic Nunciature, is among those said to be affected.
The head of the UK’s Consular Corps told theMail on Sunday the decision has created “havoc”.
The Foreign Office has been in touch with HSBC, stepping in to help diplomats open other bank accounts.
HSBC said embassies were subject to the same assessments as its other business customers. They need to satisfy five criteria – international connectivity, economic development, profitability, cost efficiency and liquidity.
A spokesman said: “HSBC has been applying a rolling programme of “five filter” assessments to all its businesses since May 2011, and our services for embassies are no exception.
“We do not comment on individual customer relationships.”
The Mail on Sunday reported that the High Commission of Papua New Guinea and the Honorary Consulate of Benin have also been asked to move their accounts within 60 days.
Bernard Silver, head of the Consular Corps, which represents consuls in the UK, told the paper: “HSBC’s decision has created havoc.
“Embassies and consulates desperately need a bank, not just to take in money for visas and passports but to pay staff wages, rent bills, even the congestion charge.”
John Belavu, minister at the Papua New Guinea High Commission, said: “We’ve been banking with HSBC for 22 years and for them to throw us off in this way was a bombshell.”
Lawrence Landau, honorary consul of Benin, told the paper his mission had been having trouble finding a new bank.
He said: “We have been trying everyone but all the UK banks are clamming up.”
Suspicious accountsEmbassies are treated like business customers by banks as they generally use services like cash and payroll management and can take out loans.
They also have to pay for ambassadorial accommodation and costs such as school fees for the children of diplomats – expenses that are difficult to meet without a valid UK bank account.
They are sometimes considered to be at risk of money laundering activities because of their political exposure and banks have been warned in the past for failing to flag up suspicious accounts.
The Riggs National Bank in Washington was fined and later sold off after a 2004 US Senate report revealed executives in its embassy business had helped Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet hide millions of dollars.
HSBC was fined $1.92bn (£1.26bn) by US authorities last year after it was blamed for alleged money laundering activities said to have been conducted through its Latin American operations by drug cartels.
The bank admitted at the time that it had failed to effectively counter money laundering.
~NEWS Bussiness
-
You are an intruder in our land
And this is how we are going to bring the system down, by everyone educating themselves to our own rights! Please learn all you can about your common law rights and do not let the slavery system tell you what to do. Remember that legally they do not exist, which this is what the OPPT did! Browse our website, especially the categories Brake the Chains and IUV Corner. It is all designed to bring you awareness, and please share.USA Common Law Court Action: Anthony Williams Foreclosure Defense July 30 2013 from Revolution Television on Vimeo.
-
Proof ALL of Your Debt is PRE-PAID!
Your debt is PRE-PAID!
Right now even though they have no legal right or claim or lien, the bankers hold the “title” to YOU through your birth certificate. You can regain control by simply filing a notice of lien against the birth certificate. Filing notices of lien is done every day. Banks regularly file notices of liens with the Department of Commerce to prove and establish their interest in all kinds of property… homes, cars, tools, equipment. This is done very simply by contacting the Secretary of State or Department of Commerce and filing a UCC-1 financing statement and listing the property as collateral on the statement. The same can be done with your birth certificate, which is your property. You and only you can file this notice of lien… You and only you can determine the value of the property. Since you are priceless in God’s eyes the value of your UCC-1 should be UNLIMITED.In this case, the “company” is the government. Because you “agreed” to work for the government, the company, for the rest of your life, the government (company) agreed to “pay” all of the debt you incur in your lifetime. Is that a bit of a surprise to you? It should be. No one has told you or showed you how use this information. In exchange for your birth certificate and your application for Social Security, which they used as collateral to reduce their debt with the bankers, the government (company) promised to pay your debts. You work on behalf of the US government AS COLLATERAL ON THE NATIONAL DEBT owed to the bankers.
Whatever your debt, it’s actually prepaid.
That’s right, your debt is “prepaid” with what is known as “money of account.” There is no real substance or “money of exchange” such as gold or silver; only accounting adjustments and set offs. The US government agreed to do this for you with the passage of House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192 back in 1933 shortly after the National Emergency and Bank Holiday declared by President Roosevelt. You’re already signed up for this program from birth; it’s just that no one told you about it, UNTIL NOW!
Like all good companies though, the US government offered to its “worker bees”, insurance benefits. They offered insurance to us if we would fill out an SS-5 form, also known as “Application for Social Security Benefits”. It’s also the hook they use to get us to sign up as their collateral on the national debt. This all originated from the “Shepard Towners Maternity Act” that was to help new mothers with the care of their children if the mother was unwed. (This is why they ask for the maiden name of the mother on the “application for live birth”. All of us are considered to be “bastard children” with the government (company) as our “daddy”)
The SS-5 is really a Power Of Attorney (POA) for the company that issued the insurance benefit to You, the real man or woman. POA was assumed by the company, the government. When they established the new account they styled the name in ALL CAPS. Very few people normally sign their name in ALL CAPS. Your JOHN H. DOE is really a corporation. Print your name in ALL CAPS if you intend to express the name/ title of Your corporation. You’ll find it on “your” driver’s license, “your” social security card, “your” bank statement, “your” check blanks, “your” tax statements, etc. The Social Security number is evidence that thereis an insurance policy. The benefit you are receiving is the privilege of an army, navy, police, fire protection, Medicaid, medicare, SSI, pension etc.
So far it has worked quite well for the government (company)… they just didn’t tell you how to go about getting your debt set off and how to access and use the pre-paid account, all the more money for their pet projects…wars of pre-emption, international intrigue, control and domination of the global markets, etc. You/ve perhaps read about this in the news or seen it on the evening news. You’re letting them use your money for crimes against humanity.
This guy is very clever. by watching his videos you will see that he does not pay any bills, we believe he got the system all figured out.
~Stop the Pirates
