Category: Break the Chains

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Purpose.  An electromagnetic pulse (EMP) has the potential to disrupt, degrade, and damage technology and critical infrastructure systems.  Human-made or naturally occurring EMPs can affect large geographic areas, disrupting elements critical to the Nation’s security and economic prosperity, and could adversely affect global commerce and stability.  The Federal Government must foster sustainable, efficient, and cost-effective approaches to improving the Nation’s resilience to the effects of EMPs.

Sec. 2.  Definitions.  As used in this order:

(a)  “Critical infrastructure” means systems and assets, whether physical or virtual, so vital to the United States that the incapacity or destruction of such systems and assets would have a debilitating impact on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination of those matters.

(b)  “Electromagnetic pulse” is a burst of electromagnetic energy.  EMPs have the potential to negatively affect technology systems on Earth and in space.  A high-altitude EMP (HEMP) is a type of human-made EMP that occurs when a nuclear device is detonated at approximately 40 kilometers or more above the surface of Earth.  A geomagnetic disturbance (GMD) is a type of natural EMP driven by a temporary disturbance of Earth’s magnetic field resulting from interactions with solar eruptions.  Both HEMPs and GMDs can affect large geographic areas.

(c)  “National Critical Functions” means the functions of government and the private sector so vital to the United States that their disruption, corruption, or dysfunction would have a debilitating effect on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination thereof.

(d)  “National Essential Functions” means the overarching responsibilities of the Federal Government to lead and sustain the Nation before, during, and in the aftermath of a catastrophic emergency, such as an EMP that adversely affects the performance of Government.

(e)  “Prepare” and “preparedness” mean the actions taken to plan, organize, equip, train, and exercise to build and sustain the capabilities necessary to prevent, protect against, mitigate the effects of, respond to, and recover from those threats that pose the greatest risk to the security of the Nation.  These terms include the prediction and notification of impending EMPs.

(f)  A “Sector-Specific Agency” (SSA) is the Federal department or agency that is responsible for providing institutional knowledge and specialized expertise as well as leading, facilitating, or supporting the security and resilience programs and associated activities of its designated critical infrastructure sector in the all-hazards environment.  The SSAs are those identified in Presidential Policy Directive 21 of February 12, 2013 (Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience).

Sec. 3.  Policy.  (a)  It is the policy of the United States to prepare for the effects of EMPs through targeted approaches that coordinate whole-of-government activities and encourage private-sector engagement.  The Federal Government must provide warning of an impending EMP; protect against, respond to, and recover from the effects of an EMP through public and private engagement, planning, and investment; and prevent adversarial events through deterrence, defense, and nuclear nonproliferation efforts.  To achieve these goals, the Federal Government shall engage in risk-informed planning, prioritize research and development (R&D) to address the needs of critical infrastructure stakeholders, and, for adversarial threats, consult Intelligence Community assessments.

(b)  To implement the actions directed in this order, the Federal Government shall promote collaboration and facilitate information sharing, including the sharing of threat and vulnerability assessments, among executive departments and agencies (agencies), the owners and operators of critical infrastructure, and other relevant stakeholders, as appropriate.  The Federal Government shall also provide incentives, as appropriate, to private-sector partners to encourage innovation that strengthens critical infrastructure against the effects of EMPs through the development and implementation of best practices, regulations, and appropriate guidance.

Sec. 4.  Coordination.  (a)  The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA), through National Security Council staff and in consultation with the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), shall coordinate the development and implementation of executive branch actions to assess, prioritize, and manage the risks of EMPs.  The APNSA shall, on an annual basis, submit a report to the President summarizing progress on the implementation of this order, identifying gaps in capability, and recommending how to address those gaps.

(b)  To further the Federal R&D necessary to prepare the Nation for the effects of EMPs, the Director of OSTP shall coordinate efforts of agencies through the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC).  The Director of OSTP, through the NSTC, shall annually review and assess the R&D needs of agencies conducting preparedness activities for EMPs, consistent with this order.

Sec. 5.  Roles and Responsibilities.  (a)  The Secretary of State shall:

(i)   lead the coordination of diplomatic efforts with United States allies and international partners regarding enhancing resilience to the effects of EMPs; and

(ii)  in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other relevant agencies, strengthen nuclear nonproliferation and deterrence efforts, which would reduce the likelihood of an EMP attack on the United States or its allies and partners by limiting the availability of nuclear devices.

(b)  The Secretary of Defense shall:

(i)    in cooperation with the heads of relevant agencies and with United States allies, international partners, and private-sector entities as appropriate, improve and develop the ability to rapidly characterize, attribute, and provide warning of EMPs, including effects on space systems of interest to the United States;

(ii)   provide timely operational observations, analyses, forecasts, and other products for naturally occurring EMPs to support the mission of the Department of Defense along with United States allies and international partners, including the provision of alerts and warnings for natural EMPs that may affect weapons systems, military operations, or the defense of the United States;

(iii)  conduct R&D and testing to understand the effects of EMPs on Department of Defense systems and infrastructure, improve capabilities to model and simulate the environments and effects of EMPs, and develop technologies to protect Department of Defense systems and infrastructure from the effects of EMPs to ensure the successful execution of Department of Defense missions;

(iv)   review and update existing EMP-related standards for Department of Defense systems and infrastructure, as appropriate;

(v)    share technical expertise and data regarding EMPs and their potential effects with other agencies and with the private sector, as appropriate;

(vi)   incorporate attacks that include EMPs as a factor in defense planning scenarios; and

(vii)  defend the Nation from adversarial EMPs originating outside of the United States through defense and deterrence, consistent with the mission and national security policy of the Department of Defense.

(c)  The Secretary of the Interior shall support the research, development, deployment, and operation of capabilities that enhance understanding of variations of Earth’s magnetic field associated with EMPs.

(d)  The Secretary of Commerce shall:

(i)   provide timely and accurate operational observations, analyses, forecasts, and other products for natural EMPs, exclusive of the responsibilities of the Secretary of Defense set forth in subsection (b)(ii) of this section; and

(ii)  use the capabilities of the Department of Commerce, the private sector, academia, and nongovernmental organizations to continuously improve operational forecasting services and the development of standards for commercial EMP technology.

(e)  The Secretary of Energy shall conduct early-stage R&D, develop pilot programs, and partner with other agencies and the private sector, as appropriate, to characterize sources of EMPs and their couplings to the electric power grid and its subcomponents, understand associated potential failure modes for the energy sector, and coordinate preparedness and mitigation measures with energy sector partners.

(f)  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall:

(i)    provide timely distribution of information on EMPs and credible associated threats to Federal, State, and local governments, critical infrastructure owners and operators, and other stakeholders;

(ii)   in coordination with the heads of any relevant SSAs, use the results of risk assessments to better understand and enhance resilience to the effects of EMPs across all critical infrastructure sectors, including coordinating the identification of national critical functions and the prioritization of associated critical infrastructure at greatest risk to the effects of EMPs;

(iii)  coordinate response to and recovery from the effects of EMPs on critical infrastructure, in coordination with the heads of appropriate SSAs;

(iv)   incorporate events that include EMPs as a factor in preparedness scenarios and exercises;

(v)    in coordination with the heads of relevant SSAs, conduct R&D to better understand and more effectively model the effects of EMPs on national critical functions and associated critical infrastructure — excluding Department of Defense systems and infrastructure — and develop technologies and guidelines to enhance these functions and better protect this infrastructure;

(vi)   maintain survivable means to provide necessary emergency information to the public during and after EMPs; and

(vii)  in coordination with the Secretaries of Defense and Energy, and informed by intelligence-based threat assessments, develop quadrennial risk assessments on EMPs, with the first risk assessment delivered within 1 year of the date of this order.

(g)  The Director of National Intelligence shall:

(i)   coordinate the collection, analysis, and promulgation, as appropriate, of intelligence-based assessments on adversaries’ capabilities to conduct an attack utilizing an EMP and the likelihood of such an attack; and

(ii)  provide intelligence-based threat assessments to support the heads of relevant SSAs in the development of quadrennial risk assessments on EMPs.

(h)  The heads of all SSAs, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall enhance and facilitate information sharing with private-sector counterparts, as appropriate, to enhance preparedness for the effects of EMPs, to identify and share vulnerabilities, and to work collaboratively to reduce vulnerabilities.

(i)  The heads of all agencies that support National Essential Functions shall ensure that their all­hazards preparedness planning sufficiently addresses EMPs, including through mitigation, response, and recovery, as directed by national preparedness policy.

Sec. 6.  Implementation.  (a)  Identifying national critical functions and associated priority critical infrastructure at greatest risk.

(i)   Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of SSAs and other agencies as appropriate, shall identify and list the national critical functions and associated priority critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets, including space-based assets that, if disrupted, could reasonably result in catastrophic national or regional effects on public health or safety, economic security, or national security.  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall update this list as necessary.

(ii)  Within 1 year of the identification described in subsection (a)(i) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of other agencies as appropriate, shall, using appropriate government and private-sector standards for EMPs, assess which identified critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets are most vulnerable to the effects of EMPs.  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide this list to the President, through the APNSA.  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall update this list using the results produced pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, and as necessary thereafter.

(b)  Improving understanding of the effects of EMPs.

(i)    Within 180 days of the identification described in subsection (a)(ii) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of SSAs and in consultation with the Director of OSTP and the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall review test data — identifying any gaps in such data — regarding the effects of EMPs on critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets representative of those throughout the Nation.

(ii)   Within 180 days of identifying the gaps in existing test data, as directed by subsection (b)(i) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of SSAs and in consultation with the Director of OSTP and the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall use the sector partnership structure identified in the National Infrastructure Protection Plan to develop an integrated cross-sector plan to address the identified gaps.  The heads of agencies identified in the plan shall implement the plan in collaboration with the private sector, as appropriate.

(iii)  Within 1 year of the date of this order, and as appropriate thereafter, the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the heads of other agencies and the private sector, as appropriate, shall review existing standards for EMPs and develop or update, as necessary, quantitative benchmarks that sufficiently describe the physical characteristics of EMPs, including waveform and intensity, in a form that is useful to and can be shared with owners and operators of critical infrastructure.

(iv)   Within 4 years of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Interior shall complete a magnetotelluric survey of the contiguous United States to help critical infrastructure owners and operators conduct EMP vulnerability assessments.

(c)  Evaluating approaches to mitigate the effects of EMPs.

(i)    Within 1 year of the date of this order, and every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretaries of Defense and Energy, and in consultation with the Director of OSTP, the heads of other appropriate agencies, and private-sector partners as appropriate, shall submit to the President, through the APNSA, a report that analyzes the technology options available to improve the resilience of critical infrastructure to the effects of EMPs.  The Secretaries of Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security shall also identify gaps in available technologies and opportunities for future technological developments to inform R&D activities.

(ii)   Within 180 days of the completion of the activities directed by subsections (b)(iii) and (c)(i) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of other agencies and in consultation with the private sector as appropriate, shall develop and implement a pilot test to evaluate available engineering approaches for mitigating the effects of EMPs on the most vulnerable critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets, as identified in subsection (a)(ii) of this section.

(iii)  Within 1 year of the date of this order, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the heads of relevant SSAs, and in consultation with appropriate regulatory and utility commissions and other stakeholders, shall identify regulatory and non regulatory mechanisms, including cost recovery measures, that can enhance private-sector engagement to address the effects of EMPs.

(d)  Strengthening critical infrastructure to withstand the effects of EMPs.

(i)    Within 90 days of completing the actions directed in subsection (c)(ii) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretaries of Defense and Energy and in consultation with the heads of other appropriate agencies and with the private sector as appropriate, shall develop a plan to mitigate the effects of EMPs on the vulnerable priority critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets identified under subsection (a)(ii) of this section.  The plan shall align with and build on actions identified in reports required by Executive Order 13800 of May 11, 2017 (Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure).  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement those elements of the plan that are consistent with Department of Homeland Security authorities and resources, and report to the APNSA regarding any additional authorities and resources needed to complete its implementation.  The Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretaries of Defense and Energy, shall update the plan as necessary based on results from the actions directed in subsections (b) and (c) of this section.

(ii)   Within 180 days of the completion of the actions identified in subsection (c)(i) of this section, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of Homeland Security and Energy, shall conduct a pilot test to evaluate engineering approaches used to harden a strategic military installation, including infrastructure that is critical to supporting that installation, against the effects of EMPs.

(iii)  Within 180 days of completing the pilot test described in subsection (d)(ii) of this section, the Secretary of Defense shall report to the President, through the APNSA, regarding the cost and effectiveness of the evaluated approaches.

(e)  Improving response to EMPs.

(i)    Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Homeland Security, through the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, in coordination with the heads of appropriate SSAs, shall review and update Federal response plans, programs, and procedures to account for the effects of EMPs.

(ii)   Within 180 days of the completion of actions directed by subsection (e)(i) of this section, agencies that support National Essential Functions shall update operational plans documenting their procedures and responsibilities to prepare for, protect against, and mitigate the effects of EMPs.

(iii)  Within 180 days of identifying vulnerable priority critical infrastructure systems, networks, and assets as directed by subsection (a)(ii) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretaries of Defense and Commerce, and the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, shall provide the Deputy Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism and the Director of OSTP with an assessment of the effects of EMPs on critical communications infrastructure, and recommend changes to operational plans to enhance national response and recovery efforts after an EMP.

Sec. 7.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
March 26, 2019.

~~~~~~~~

http://wetheonepeople.com/eo-13865-national-resilience-to-electromagnetic-pulses/= this posting

Navigate: www.wetheonepeople.com

~the people

http://wetheonepeople.com/alexandra-ocasio-cortez-a-great-actress/=this posting

Navigate: www.wetheonepeople.com

~the people

The US-funded CANVAS organization that trained Juan Guaido and his allies produced a 2010 memo on exploiting electricity outages and urged the opposition “to take advantage of the situation…towards their needs”

By Max Blumenthal

A September 2010 memo by a US-funded soft power organization that helped train Venezuelan coup leader Juan Guaido and his allies identifies the potential collapse of the country’s electrical sector as “a watershed event” that “would likely have the impact of galvanizing public unrest in a way that no opposition group could ever hope to generate.”

The memo has special relevance today as Guaido moves to exploit nationwide blackouts caused by a major failure at the Simon Bolivar Hydroelectric Plant at Guri dam – a crisis that Venezuela’s government blames on US sabotage.

It was authored by Srdja Popovic of the Center for Applied Non-Violent Action and Strategies (CANVAS), a Belgrade-based “democracy promotion” organization funded by the US government that has trained thousands of US-aligned youth activists in countries where the West seeks regime change.

This group reportedly hosted Guaido and the key leaders of his Popular Will party for a series of training sessions, fashioning them into a “Generation 2007” determined to foment resistance to then-President Hugo Chavez and sabotage his plans to implement “21st century socialism” in Venezuela.

In the 2010 memo, CANVAS’s Popovic declared, “A key to Chavez’s current weakness is the decline in the electricity sector.” Popovic explicitly identified the Simon Bolivar Hydroelectric Plant as a friction point, emphasizing that “water levels at the Guri dam are dropping, and Chavez has been unable to reduce consumption sufficiently to compensate for the deteriorating industry.”

Speculating on a “grave possibility that some 70 percent of the country’s electricity grid could go dark as soon as April 2010,” the CANVAS leader stated that “an opposition group would be best served to take advantage of the situation and spin it against Chavez and towards their needs.”

Flash forward to March 2019, and the scenario outlined by Popovic is playing out almost exactly as he had imagined.

On March 7, just days after Guaido’s return from Colombia, where he participated in the failed and demonstrably violentFebruary 23 attempt to ram a shipment of US aid across the Venezuelan border, the Simon Bolivar Hydroelectric Plant experienced a major and still unexplained collapse.

Days later, electricity remains sporadic across the country. Meanwhile, Guaido has done everything he can “to take advantage of the situation and spin it” against President Nicolas Maduro – just as his allies were urged to do over eight years before by CANVAS.

Rubio vows “a period of suffering” for Venezuela hours before the blackout

The Venezuelan government has placed the blame squarely on Washington, accusing it of sabotage through a cyber-attack on its electrical infrastructure. Key players in the US-directed coup attempt have done little to dispel the accusation.

In a tweet on March 8, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo framed the electricity outage as a pivotal stage in US plans for regime change:

At noon on March 7, during a hearing on Venezuela at the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee, Sen. Marco Rubio explicitly called for the US to stir “widespread unrest,” declaring that it “needs to happen” in order to achieve regime change.

Around 5 PM, the Simon Bolivar Hydroelectric Plant experienced a total and still unexplained collapse. Residents of Caracas and throughout Venezuela were immediately plunged into darkness.

At 5:18 PM, a clearly excited Rubio took to Twitter to announce the blackout and claim that “backup generators have failed.” It was unclear how Rubio had obtained such specific information so soon after the outage occurred. According to Jorge Rodriguez, the communications minister of Venezuela, local authorities did not know if backup generators had failed at the time of Rubio’s tweet.

Back in Caracas, Guaido immediately set out to exploit the situation, just as his CANVAS trainers had advised over eight years before. Taking to Twitter just over an hour after Rubio, Guaido declared, “the light will return when the usurpation [of Maduro] ends.” Like Pompeo, the self-declared president framed the blackouts as part of a regime change strategy, not an accident or error.

Two days later, Guaido was at the center of opposition rally he convened in affluent eastern Caracas, bellowing into a megaphone: “Article 187 when the time comes. We need to be in the streets, mobilized. It depends on us, not on anybody else.”

Article 187 establishes the right of the National Assembly “to authorize the use of Venezuelan military missions abroad or foreign in the country.”

Upon his mention of the constitutional article, Guaido’s supporters responded, “Intervention! Intervention!”

Exploiting crisis to “get back into a position of power”

As Dan Cohen and I reported here at the Grayzone, Guaido’s rise to prominence – and the coup plot that he has been appointed to oversee – is the product of a decade-long project overseen by the Belgrade-based CANVAS outfit.

CANVAS is a spinoff of Otpor, a Serbian protest group founded by Srdja Popovic in 1998 at the University of Belgrade. Otpor, which means “resistance” in Serbian, was the student group that worked alongside US soft power organizations to mobilize the protests that eventually toppled the late Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic.

CANVAS has been funded largely through the National Endowment for Democracy, a CIA cut-out that functions as the US government’s main arm of promoting regime change.  According to leaked internal emails from Stratfor, an intelligence firm known as the “shadow CIA,” CANVAS “may have also received CIA funding and training during the 1999/2000 anti-Milosevic struggle.”

A leaked email from a Stratfor staffer noted that after they ousted Milosevic, “the kids who ran OTPOR grew up, got suits and designed CANVAS… or in other words a ‘export-a-revolution’ group that sowed the seeds for a NUMBER of color revolutions. They are still hooked into U.S. funding and basically go around the world trying to topple dictators and autocratic governments (ones that U.S. does not like ;).”

Stratfor subsequently revealed that CANVAS “turned its attention to Venezuela” in 2005, after training opposition movements that led pro-NATO regime change operations across Eastern Europe.

In September 2010, as Venezuela headed for a parliamentary election, CANVAS produced a series of memos outlining the plans they had hatched with “non-formal actors” like Guaido and his cadre of student activists to bring down Chavez. “This is the first opportunity for the opposition to get back into a position of power,” Popovic wrote at the time.

In his memo on electricity outages, Popovic highlighted the importance of the Venezuelan military in achieving regime change. “Alliances with the military could be critical because in such a situation of massive public unrest and rejection of the presidency,” the CANVAS founder wrote, “malcontent sectors of the military will likely decide to intervene, but only if they believe they have sufficient support.”

While the scenario Popovic envisioned failed to materialize in 2010, it perfectly describes the situation gripping Venezuela today as an opposition leader cultivated by CANVAS seeks to spin the crisis against Maduro while calling on the military to break ranks.

Since the Grayzone exposed the deep ties between CANVAS and Guaido’s Popular Will party, Popovic has attempted to publicly distance himself from his record of training Venezuela’s opposition.

Today, however, Popovic’s 2010 memo on exploiting electricity outages reads like a blueprint for the strategy that Guaido and his patrons in Washington have actively implemented. Whether or not the blackout is the result of external sabotage, it represents the “watershed event” that CANVAS has prepared its Venezuelan cadres for.

By Max Blumenthal= https://thegrayzone.com/2019/03/11/us-regime-change-blueprint-proposed-venezuelan-electricity-blackouts-as-watershed-event-for-galvanizing-public-unrest/= original post

Max Blumenthal is an award-winning journalist and the author of several books, including best-selling Republican Gomorrah, Goliath, The Fifty One Day War, and The Management of Savagery. He has produced print articles for an array of publications, many video reports, and several documentaries, including Killing Gaza. Blumenthal founded The Grayzone in 2015 to shine a journalistic light on America’s state of perpetual war and its dangerous domestic repercussion

Learn more about Venezuela and the Neo-cons within this video:

Related: http://wetheonepeople.com/an-ocean-of-lies-on-venezuela-abby-martin-un-rapporteur-expose-coup/

http://wetheonepeople.com/us-regime-change-blueprint-proposed-venezuelan-electricity-blackouts-as-watershed-event-for-galvanizing-public-unrest/= this posting

Navigate: www.wetheonepeople.com

~the people

On February 23, 2019 was the last day for a final closing of the United States Corporation that by the way this will be a topic for another day. As you can imagine an entire world fell apart, inclusive the taking away of any authority of be brainwashing humanity as has been the so call Pope Francis and his worldwide pedophiles+ children murders legions that as well enforced all kinds of sexual immorality.  We are assuming the closing of the US corporation has to do immensely with this but in truth Pope Francis has a whole load of dirty clothes that are against him.

The fact is that Pope Francis, or the demons from the Vatican if you will have had the entire country of the United States to their disposition to do whatever they wish with it, and this included our people. This was done all along with communist China, and all their worldwide agents so call brokers like all those famous families as the Rockefeller, the Royals, the world bank, and countless mafia groups that did the terrorists bidding worldwide. Further, they had every politician grabbed by their balls to do as they were told. Their aim was frankly destroy our humanity all ways always along with the entire planet.

But now they cannot do anything else because they are all BROKE. So desperately they are, they attempted to invade Venezuela to grab all their oils reserve besides that for a year or so they are holding the money they owe Venezuela for the oil they purchase because truly, they just did not have that money at all. And now Venezuela is going through many issues politically and economically, but we think they will survive just fine.

Thank you HOS. We love you! This was the only way we could save the creation. What is next? Answer= many arrests+ many BOOM BOOM+ a new republic with its founding laws+ a new financial system for the entire planet is on the way slowly but surely.

MORE to come. Keep on praying!

For now enjoy this video for the more you know:

Related:http://wetheonepeople.com/michigan-ag-pledges-thorough-investigation-into-sex-abuse/

It is all About the Benjamins: Israel and its Demons worldwide

http://wetheonepeople.com/pope-francis-stripped-of-power-w-kevin-anne/= this posting

Navigate: www.wetheonepeople.com

~the people

The more you know, the better for the entire world. Truth never hides. Outstanding report by journalist Abby Martin concerning the inhumane issues about Venezuela perpetrated by the Ziocons from Washington DC that think they have the authority to invade Venezuela, or any country for that matter with the pretext of bringing Aids when the facts are the aids they are bringing are arms, drugs, and terrorists to do their dirty work that is to steal the resources from that country such as oil, etc. This is invasion+ violation of natural, common, and international law. This is a total game plan by the fuckwits from the CIA enterprise hungry criminals that as we speak are all broke.

CIA+ war criminals= all Senior Executives Server members[SES] that are call by many names such as Mossad+ ISIS+Satanists+ Havah mafia. The fuckwits that needs be no more worldwide.

Shills like Elio Abram, Michael Bolton, Mike Pompeo, Mike Pence, Juan Guaido, Marco Rubio, Julio Burgos, and Alias Quinto to name a few, the American people+ the Venezuelan people are commanding their immediate arrest for crimes against humanity. Further, the immediate release for some of the money they are holding against the Venezuelan people for them to thrive. It is beyond embarrassment to these body of criminals knowing that their game plan of deceptions and lies are expose for the entire world to see… their game is OVER, and this goes as well for their legions of lobbyist whores call journalists that are filling the airways with their propagandas FAKE news lies in Spanish as well. We the people command cease and desist your satanic coup against Venezuela immediately. So be it, be it so.  <LF>

Related: http://wetheonepeople.com/learn-the-real-truth-about-the-issues-confronting-venezuela/

http://wetheonepeople.com/an-ocean-of-lies-on-venezuela-abby-martin-un-rapporteur-expose-coup/   = this posting

Navigate: www.wetheonepeople.com

~the people

by Jay McNally  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  February 23, 2019

Detroit and other state dioceses leave many unanswered questions about pederast priests.

When more than 50 reporters had the opportunity to question Michigan Attorney Dana Nessel about the investigation into what her office is calling “Clergy Abuse in the Catholic Church” during a press conference Thursday, it was surprising, at least to this observer, how few questions the reporters asked about the investigation.

Nessel is the state’s new attorney general and called her first press conference since taking office in January to discuss the three investigations her office is working on: clergy abuse, the Flint water crisis and Dr. Larry Nassar at Michigan State University (MSU).

It was the first statewide raid conducted on the Catholic Church in American history.Tweet

Church Militant aired a video report about the event, explaining that “the investigation is far bigger than most know, involving not only all seven dioceses, where priests were shuffled from one diocese to another, but multiple states as well, since abusive clergy were also moved out of state.”

It was a special treat for me to attend this rarest of press conferences, representing Church Militant with Niles. The press conference was a very big deal, but also in a sense anti-climactic.

First, one cannot underestimate the unprecedented scope of what is happening. Not only has the top prosecutor in Michigan said publicly that the Catholic Church is a “criminal enterprise,” but this is the first time in history the Church has been under this kind of scrutiny.

Without any notice, at the same time one morning October last year, 70 officers with the Michigan State Police and 14 state assistant attorneys general raided all seven Michigan dioceses: Detroit, Saginaw, Lansing, Marquette, Gaylord, Kalamazoo and Grand Rapids. In addition to chancery headquarters, offices in multiple other diocese-related buildings, including Sacred Heart Seminary in Detroit, were raided.

It was the first statewide raid conducted on the Catholic Church in American history.

Nessel said her staffers are now poring over hundreds of thousands of pages from Church files and working on more than 300 tips from the public, many of them victims of clergy abuse.

So far, she said, there is evidence of cover-ups of clergy abuse in most Michigan dioceses, and there will likely be more than 1,000 victims identified.

She encouraged anyone who has been abused or who has witnessed or knows about clergy abuse to report that abuse to her office using the state’s clergy abuse hotline, rather than going to Church officials, and has also asked each diocese to suspend its own internal review process until the state’s investigation is complete.

“Every report will be analyzed factually and in-depth,” Nessel said, adding that if abuse does not rise to the level of a crime, information gained from research into that particular event could be used to pursue other incidents. “You still might be able to help others,” she noted.

She also indicated that non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) signed by some victims in the past to settle abuse lawsuits or complaints are not necessarily binding if they’re part of a settlement for a crime: “NDAs will not protect the Church.”

When asked by Church Militant when the final report will be issued, she estimated it will take about two more years. She declined to say whether prosecutions will take place before the close of the investigations, but her primary goal is to remove known priest-predators from ministry immediately, regardless of the statute of limitations.

When asked twice about how she anticipates dealing with priest-abusers who are elderly, Nessel was straightforward. “It doesn’t matter who they are or how old they are; if we can show a crime was committed,” she made clear they will be prosecuted.

Most telling, was her response to Christine Niles’ final question of the whole press conference: What about bishops and others who enabled the predators? Will you also go after them?

Nessel carefully nuanced her response, saying that her staffers are going to examine every case carefully and “if we can show a crime was committed” every effort will be used to achieve justice: “Nothing is off the table.”

Nessel challenged the dioceses to set up a fund for victims to be administered by the attorney general’s office so that victims may receive help for trauma they have experienced.

Most of the Q&A period of the press conference dealt with the Flint water crisis, perhaps because at this stage of the Catholic clergy sex abuse scandal, the outcomes of investigations have become predictable: the same basic storyline, only with different names of victims, bishops, priests, lawyers and the lay enablers who are invariably on the bishops’ payroll.

‘If we can show a crime was committed,’ every effort will be used to achieve justice: ‘Nothing is off the table.’Tweet

Many are no doubt expecting the final report to be a kind of remake of some not-so-old old movies and updated local history.

As one who has covered the sex scandals in Michigan for local and national media for 39 years, here are only a few of the big Michigan abuse cases Nessel and her staff will surely research and provide information the Church refuses to provide:

• St. Sebastian’s Angels: Were there formal complaints about Fr. William Auth, who worked in the diocese of Lansing and sent a photo of himself with a 12-year-old boy in Mexico whom he said “is not my current lover?”
• Fr. Neil Emon: This priest was among the five members of the Crosier order that are on the archdiocese of Detroit’s list of credibly accused priests. They were removed only after the 2002 Boston Globe Spotlight series. One publication in the Detroit media described the nature of his offense as “oral sex with a 10-year-old boy” before he came to Detroit, but that comment cannot be found on the internet today. However, that report indicated that even after Detroit’s Cdl. Adam Maida was informed of the offense, he allowed Fr. Emon to be pastor of St. Alfred Church in Taylor, which had an elementary school. Emon was also a local vicar, which means he was personally able to shut down a protest about rampant homosexuality at the local high school, Gabriel Richard, in Riverview. Multiple requests fom me for accurate information about Emon has been ignored for more than a decade by the Crosier order and by Ned McGrath, former director of communications for the archdiocese of Detroit. Nessel will be able to get answers to these questions.
• Fr. Thaddeus Ozog: He was best friends with notorious pedophile Fr. Gerald Shirilla and died of AIDS in 1994. One month after the Michigan attorney general’s raids, the archdiocese of Detroit suddenly announced that there was a credible allegation that Ozog molested a minor.
• Fr. James Poman: One of the more curious cases involves recurring and persistent rumors from multiple sources (seminarians, priests, etc.) about Fr. James Poman, who died of AIDS in the early 1990s, and was a pedophile and reportedly part of a group of local priests that passed boys around for their amusement. Buried in my files is a news article about his death noting he died of AIDS, but his name is not listed on the Detroit archdiocese’s list of “priests credibly accused of abuse.” The archbishop informed me several years ago he will not even acknowledge any questions from me. But the attorney general’s office should get answers.

For those new to the sex-scandals mess, the basic outline of the saga is revealed in several films and documents. Among the films, the best include The Boys of St. Vincent (1994), Calgary (2014) and Spotlight (2015).

Buried in my files is a news article about his death noting he died of AIDS, but his name is not listed on the Detroit archdiocese’s list of ‘priests credibly accused of abuse.’Tweet

Dozens of legal reports are out there, but the 2005 Philadelphia Grand Jury report is all you need to read to learn how the Catholic Church rolls.

In response to our query, Dan Olsen, spokesman for Attorney General Dana Nessel, told Church Militant her office must decline to answer the question whether a bishop or his staffers might be guilty of obstruction of justice for a crime of sex abuse if the individual predator who was protected is deceased or the statute of limitations has run out.

“We cannot give additional information as it might jeopardize the extent of any investigation,” Olsen said.

~~~~~~~

http://wetheonepeople.com/michigan-ag-pledges-thorough-investigation-into-sex-abuse/= this posting

Navigate: www.freeport1953.com

~the people