Category: Break the Chains

In order to be free we must unlearn what we have learned.

  • Intel Report: The Uranium 1 Trial with George Webb

    fullsizeoutput_19caWhile we are being distracted by the impeachment of POTUS, behind the scenes is the real thing. Uranium 1 Trial that is all about the biggest cover up of all times, where the plan was perhaps destroy the country of The United States. 20 thousand nuclear warheads coming from Russia to our country+ Urinko/Urenko, which is the most powerful power player in the world. In fact, all that has to do with energy it must go through Urenko. They handle all that has to do with Uranium!

    And guess who are the most powerful players here? Well, nothing more than the British, the Dutch, and Germany. Actually the owners are all zionists Jews with their CIA+ and M1 through M16 protectors, or= the same mobs. The same ones that wants to put a nuclear plant on every city of our country+ and on every mayor city of all nations. This has been always the plan.

    We guess they wanted blow up the entire planet. Just ask ambassador Bill Taylor and family that are one of the biggest culprits within Urenko for generations. They are part of the real globalists zionists Jews+ along with zionists Muslims+ CHINA. They are the real DEEP STATE. The ones that think our country is a corporation, and so are its people. And this apply to all nations of this planet.

    Just about every politician is involve in Uranium 1 within this country+ and worldwide. Keep in mind that it is here where they make their money through money laundering any which way. In fact, all wars are all about energy. About plundering countries for this specific reason, and without regards. All this is done for their own power struggles, and greed. However, now that the cat is out of the box, they want to attack anyone, and or all that they see fit for distraction.

    We say to these demonic whores, “Our country, The United States is not for sale! The American people need not be dealing with those that no longer serve their useful purpose. Be gone. Be cease and desist!” So be it.

    NOTE: Keep in mind that this does not apply to the goods Jewish+ and good Muslims people on this planet. We are specifically speaking of some really dangerous people that main aim is that of doing evil. The ones that disguise as religious good doers when we know well they are NOT.

    Learn more by watching George Webb videos whereas he is the only one covering this event.

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb/ = the bomb

    More about George Webb outstanding journalism: http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-the-uranium-1-trial-with-george-webb/= this posting

    Continuing coverage: http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-uranium-1-trial-and-more/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-red-pill-with-george-webb-and-mcduff/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-expose-the-mobs/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-getting-to-the-bottom-of-corruption/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-on-the-road-exposing-the-facts-concerning-the-deep-state/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webbdeep-state-impeachment-actors/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-where-russian-club-k-meets-spy-satellites-with-uae-nukes/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-the-saudi-invasion-in-venice-florida/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-live-from-fbi-informants-perch-near-the-diplomat-hotel-on-hallandale-beach/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-ultimate-disclosure/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-live-from-port-canaveral-of-uae-fame-home-of-the-club-k-container-missile/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-trumps-defense-begins-with-bidens-dia-blackberries/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webbs-and-john-ultimate-disclosure-about-corruption/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/george-webb-january-8-2020-who-configured-solemanis-blackberry-he-talked-to-5-nato-teams-for-nuke-deal/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-on-the-impeachment-scandal/

    Share
  • Exposing Jeffrey Epstein’s international sex trafficking ring | 60 Minutes Australia

    Exposing-Jeffrey-Epsteins-international-sex-trafficking-ring-60-Minutes-AustraliaThe Jeffrey Epstein scandal – Tara Brown reports how a New York billionaire masterminded an international sex trafficking ring of young women, and why wealthy and powerful men, including HRH Prince Andrew, are now implicated in the saga.

    Related: http://wetheonepeople.com/conspiracy-of-silence-the-finders-and-child-trafficking/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/exposing-jeffrey-epsteins-international-sex-trafficking-ring-60-minutes-australia/= this posting

    Share
  • Conspiracy of Silence: The Finders and Child Trafficking

    Conspiracy of Silence: The Finders and Child Trafficking


    13055561_961453143910175_1940625279194675612_n-250x300
    And Quote:

    For unreasonable anger, and desires are the most existing evil.

    For it is decreed by Fate that he that does any evil should suffer for it.

    For it is the greatest evil in the world not knowing God.

    The only service of God is not to be evil. ~ Thoth

    ~~~~~~

    Related: http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-the-evil-empire-must-be-destroy/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/conspiracy-of-silence-the-finders-and-child-trafficking/= this posting

    Share
  • Intel Report: The Evil Empire Must be Destroy

    fullsizeoutput_1a02

    And Quote:

    For unreasonable anger, and desires are the most existing evil.

    For it is decreed by Fate that he that does any evil should suffer for it.

    For it is the greatest evil in the world not knowing God.

    The only service of God is not to be evil. ~ Thoth

    ~~~~~~

    For more knowing follow, and or subscribe on this reporter informative videos.

    Related: http://wetheonepeople.com/cia-director-gina-haspel-investigating-isis-link-to-mexican-massacre-threaten-by-trump-coup-forces-eric-ciaramella/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-the-evil-empire-must-be-destroy/= this posting

    Share
  • CIA Director Gina Haspel Investigating ISIS Link to Mexican Massacre Threaten by Trump Coup Forces: Eric Ciaramella

    By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

    A chilling new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today discussing the joint Federal Security Service (FSB) and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) investigation into the flow of money raised by an ISIS terror cell in the Dagestan Region and secretly funneled to Syria, states that the family members of the American children and mothers massacred in Mexico now warning that this attack was “worse than ISIS”, may be closer to the truth than even they realize—a truth growing evidence is strongly suggesting was a massacre meant as retaliation for the American military raid that killed ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and three of his children—is evidence supported by captured ISIS terrorist Abu Henricki al Canadi who revealed his terror organization’s attack plot via Mexico—and which yesterday caused CIA Director Gina Haspel to rush to Saudi Arabia to meet with King Salman to uncover further links between ISIS and Mexico—but upon whose arrival, saw CIA Director Haspel being immediately attacked by spies within her own agency warning her to stop President Donald Trump from releasing the name of the so-called “whistleblower” the coup forces against him are using to overthrow him—a “whistleblower” top socialist Democrat Party leader former US Senator Claire McCaskill is now calling a “tipster” who has no obligation to testify before anyone about anything—is actually known the world over to be CIA operative Eric Ciaramella—but whose deranged efforts to keep the American people from knowing about him and his crimes, now sees social media giant Facebook enacting a policy to remove all content that mentions his name—and Facebook further warning that they will remove any page found daring to even say the name Eric Ciaramella—which logically means that for Facebook to follow this new censorship edict they’ve just enacted, they must now remove all pages that mention and/or contain the Mueller Report—most specifically because the Mueller Report cites CIA operative Eric Ciaramella and his links to the leftist The New York Times multiple times.

     According to this report, while the families of the American babies, children and mothers massacred in Mexico bury their dead, the entire leftist mainstream propaganda media establishment in the United States continues to ignore the implications of this tragedy while devoting all of its demonic energy to keep hidden from public knowledge CIA operative Eric Ciaramella—even going so far as their demanding that Donald Trump Jr. be “immediately arrested” for his revealing this coup plotter’s identity—but who fail to mention what criminal charge could be made as they know it’s not a crime for anyone to reveal who this CIA operative is—a fact well known to top socialist impeachment coup leader Democrat Party US Congressman Eric Swalwell who threatened in a Tweet: “In the future, you will go to jail if you out a whistleblower. Legislation coming.”

    As to why the American leftist mainstream propaganda media is protecting CIA operative Eric Ciaramella at all costs to their already destroyed reputations and credibility, this report explains, is to provide cover for the socialist elites running the Democratic Party—who consider themselves to be the smartest, savviest, and most highly educated Americans—but who, beyond all belief to the point of sheer lunacy, chose Eric Ciaramella to launch their latest impeachment coup attempt against President Trump—and as best said about him: “If Washington, D.C. is a swamp, then Eric Ciaramella is a viper who slithers among them”—and in whose slithering adventures during the 2016 presidential election, found himself being an honored guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a State Department banquet.

    Joining CIA operative Eric Ciaramella in these viperous slithering adventures through the Washington D.C. swamp, this report continues, is his radical leftist Deep State attorney Mark Zaid–who upon President Trump taking office in 2017, declared “The Coup Has Started” while calling for “impeachment and rebellion”—then told his fellow coup plotters “We Will Get Rid Of Him”—followed by his declaring “I predict CNN will play a key role in Donald Trump not finishing out his full term as president”—which, of course, was followed by CNN having him appear at least 11 times on their fake news network—but none of whose viewers are allowed to know the truth that Mark Zaid near exclusively watches on his YouTube channel little girls dressed in Disney costumes.

    Lover of little girls wearing Disney costumes radical leftist Deep State attorney Mark Zaid joins with CIA operative Eric Ciaramella and CNN in latest coup plot to overthrow President Donald Trump

    Not being amused at all by this latest perverted “Impeachment for Imbeciles” coup plot to overthrow President Trump, this report concludes, are powerful Republican Party US Senators Charles Grassley and Ron Johnson—both of whom have just demanded documents and answers from the State Department related to the department’s interactions with Hunter Biden related to his paid position on the board of a Ukrainian gas firm at the time his father, Joe Biden, served as the Vice President of the United States—neither of whom are intimidated in the least by either little girl loving radical leftist Deep State attorney Mark Zaid or his CIA operative client Eric Ciaramella—but are US Senators outraged over the bombshell impeachment testimony that’s now backfired on these coup plotters when it was revealed that the Obama administration tried to partner with Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian gas firm but was blocked over corruption concerns—and were further enraged upon their learning that fired anti-Trump Ambassador Yovanovitch LIED UNDER OATH during her impeachment testimony about contact with a Democrat staffer—and as it always seems to be, is a furor President Trump keeps rising above in spite of everything that’s thrown against him—best evidenced today by his approval rating hitting 50%–which is 3 points higher than the approval rating leftist media darling President Obama had at this same point in his presidency.

    MORE

    October 31, 2019

    Outed CIA Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella Accelerates “Day Of Reckoning” Set To Cancel 2020 Election

    By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

    A mainly redacted highly-classified “Of Special Importance” new Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today reveals that the task ordered to be conducted by the Security Council (SC) to assess the strategic geopolitical issues surrounding Russia’s largest oil company Rosneft ditching the US Dollar this past week in all energy purchases has determined this move was necessary and timely due to the growing instability now occurring in the United States—an assessment supported by Denmark yesterday removing the final hurdle to complete the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia to Europe in spite of fierce American objections—moves that can best be understood by one noticing that the US is continuing to plunge itself into the abyss of outright insanity—best exampled by it now being shockingly revealed that Penzeys Spices is the top spender of Trump impeachment ads intended to boost their sales to anti-Trump deranged leftists—one of whom, beyond all doubt, is leftist CIA operative Eric Ciaramella—who left his job as top assistant to National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster in early July-2017 because of his hatred and loathing of President Trump—who’s further connected to the Steele Dossier, former CIA Director John Brennan, Obama’s top national security advisor Susan Rice, and the transfer of funds from the IMF to the Ukraine which were stolen—was first outed in 2017 as being an Obama spy planted in the White House—worked with top Democrat Party operative Alexandra Chalupa in the creation of the Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax—and has now been outed as the so-called “whistleblower” working secretly with US House Intelligence chairman Adam Schiff and Obama’s former Vice President Joe Biden in yet another attempt to overthrow Trump—the dangerous absurdities of leading to catastrophe are being noticed with grave concern and alarm the world over—most notably today by the renowned American author and journalist James Howard Kunstler—who in his just released emergency article titled “We May Not Have A 2020 Election” warns the “Day Of Reckoning” is fast approaching—correctly warns that the US banking system is nearing a crackup—points out that the majority of the top mainstream media outlets in the US are about to named as co-conspirators in the plot to overthrow Trump—further warns “a great deal about our economy and our way of life is false and is going to fail”—rightfully predicts that “when all is said and done, I am not convinced there is enough there to convict President Trump of anything”—and grimly states in his conclusion: “I think one of the possibilities is we may not have a 2020 election.  In some way or another, the country may be so disorderly that we can’t hold an election. There may be so much strife that we cannot handle the legal questions around holding the election, and it may be suspended.”

     According to the portions of this highly-classified report cleared for official viewing within the Kremlin and permitted to be openly discussed, the outing of Deep State coup plotter CIA operative Eric Ciaramella as being the “whistleblower” secretly working with US House Intelligence chairman Adam Schiff and socialist Democrat Partyleaders in an attempt to overthrow President Trump, conceals from the American people who, in fact, is the most feared “whistleblower” ever known in all of their nation’s history—a virtually unknown law professor at Georgetown University and Pentagon analyst named Doctor Adam Lovinger who was invited by General Michael Flynn to serve as a Senior Director on the White House Security Council—but on that same day, saw top Pentagon official James H. Baker filing four separate charges against Lovinger—a blatant retaliation over Doctor Lovinger having filed a bombshell “whistleblowing” complaint over “the moral hazard associated with the Washington Headquarters Services contracting with Stefan Halper”—his claiming that Halper “was being used by Net Assessment to go out essentially and engage with foreign government officials. As a contractor that’s totally illegal”—and his stating that: “There has never been an external review of these contractors’ [e.g. Halper] research products…It is now clear that over several decades the office [ONA] transferred millions of dollars to inexperienced and unqualified contractors.”

    To understand in its full and grave significance the “whistleblowing” complaint filed by Doctor Lovinger, this report explains, is that his Pentagon job was in the Office of Net Assessment (ONA)—one of the most secretive units in the Department of Defense created in 1973 by President Richard Nixon to serve as the Pentagon’s “internal think tank” that looks 20 to 30 years into the military’s future—and one of whose longest serving “private” contractors is Stefan Halper—the same Halper known as “The Cambridge Don The FBI Sent To Spy On Trump”—and is, also, the same Halper who, in 1980, conducted a CIA spying operation to ensure the defeat of Democrat Party President Jimmy Carter.

    Upon President Trump assuming power in January-2017, this report continues, Doctor Lovinger began discovering that the ONAhad been making illegal secret payments worth millions-of-dollars to Stefan Halper during the 2016 US Presidential Election to sabotage the campaign of Donald Trump—a shocking discovery Doctor Lovingershared with Trump’s new national security advisor General Michael Flynn—after which then saw General Flynn appointing Doctor Lovinger to work directly with him in the White House—but that quickly ended when the Deep State targeted both General Flynn and Doctor Lovinger for immediate destruction—a destruction of these two highly esteemed military professionals, however, the Deep State failed in executing—and has, so far, resulted in Doctor Lovinger being cleared of all the made-up charges against him, as well as General Flynn watching as the made-up charges against him go up in flames, too—made-up charges against both Doctor Lovinger and General Flynn secretly masterminded by Stefan Halper paymaster ONA Director James H. Baker—the same ONA Director Baker who flipped and is now fully cooperating with US Attorney John Durham—and based upon his stunning secret grand jury testimony into the Deep State plot to overthrow President Trump, caused US Attorney Durham to announce that his probe is now a full blown criminal investigation.

    The fast looming “Day Of Reckoning” the United States is headed for, this report concludes, is when the facts of Deep State“whistleblower” leftist CIA operative Eric Ciaramella collide with those of the highly esteemed “whistleblower” Doctor Adam Lovingerin full and catastrophic view before the American people—one of which, beyond all doubt, can in no way whatsoever survive when exposed and compared against the other—will be a titanic collision taking many of these peoples unawares as they’ve only heard of one and not the other—thus making the renowned American journalist Jim Kunstler correct in his warning assessment of the near future that says:

    I am wondering whether the editors and publishers of the Washington Post and New York Times and the producers at CNN and MSNBC are going to be named as unindicted co-conspirators in this effort to gaslight the country and really stage a coup to remove the President and to nullify the 2016 election.

    I say this as someone who is not necessarily a Trump supporter.  I didn’t vote for the guy.

    I am not a cheerleader for the guy, but basically I think the behavior of his antagonists has been much worse and much more dangerous for the nation and the American project as a long term matter.

    I really need to see some action to hold people responsible for the acts they have committed…

    I am not an attorney, and I have never worked for the Department of Justice, but it seems to me that by naming the publishers and editors of these companies as unindicted co-conspirators that allows you to avoid the appearance of trying to shut down the press because you are not going to put them in jail, but you are going  to put them in disrupt.

    That may prompt their boards of directors to fire a few people and maybe change the way they do business at these places.

    ~~~~~~~

    http://wetheonepeople.com/cia-director-gina-haspel-investigating-isis-link-to-mexican-massacre-threaten-by-trump-coup-forces-eric-ciaramella/= this posting

    Share
  • Intel Report: The 4 Interlocking California Crime Families

    housegop-1024x768And Quote: Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light.” ~Thomas Paine

    A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody. ~Thomas Paine
    ~~~~~~~

    Navigate reading related topics for ultimate knowing:

    http://wetheonepeople.com/the-communist-purple-revolution-rages-inside-the-beltway/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-the-4-interlocking-california-crime-families/= this posting

     

     

    Share
  • Intel Report: George Webb

    fullsizeoutput_19f5” Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light.”—Thomas Paine

    ~~~~~~~

    Navigate George Webb Reporting! He is on target digging the swamp from Washington DC. Thank you George for your patriotic hard work. Love. Love.

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb/= this posting = the bomb

    More about George Webb outstanding journalism: http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-the-uranium-1-trial-with-george-webb/

    Continuing coverage: http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-uranium-1-trial-and-more/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-red-pill-with-george-webb-and-mcduff/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-expose-the-mobs/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-getting-to-the-bottom-of-corruption/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-on-the-road-exposing-the-facts-concerning-the-deep-state/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webbdeep-state-impeachment-actors/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-where-russian-club-k-meets-spy-satellites-with-uae-nukes/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-the-saudi-invasion-in-venice-florida/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-live-from-fbi-informants-perch-near-the-diplomat-hotel-on-hallandale-beach/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-ultimate-disclosure/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-live-from-port-canaveral-of-uae-fame-home-of-the-club-k-container-missile/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-trumps-defense-begins-with-bidens-dia-blackberries/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webbs-and-john-ultimate-disclosure-about-corruption/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/george-webb-january-8-2020-who-configured-solemanis-blackberry-he-talked-to-5-nato-teams-for-nuke-deal/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb-on-the-impeachment-scandal/

    Share
  • The Communist Purple Revolution Rages Inside the Beltway

    The Communist Purple Revolution Rages Inside the Beltway

    housegop-1024x768The U.S. House of Representatives has never seen anything this.

    SPEAKER PELOSI’S TREACHEROUS LEADERSHIP TEARS APART THE HOUSE AS SCHIFF’S SUBTERFUGE REARS ITS UGLY HEAD YET AGAIN

    State of the Nation

    Never in the history of the U.S. Congress has there been such a revolt in the halls of the Capitol.

    These kind of cataclysmic events just don’t happen … not anywhere inside the Beltway.

    That a large group of normally restrained Republican lawmakers felt compelled to crash the secret impeachment hearings being improperly staged by Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff speaks volumes.

    Such an unprecedented disruption of proceedings within the House of Representatives especially foreshadows ever bigger events to come, as in HUGE political earthquakes.

    Now that the fuse has been lit by Schiff et al., there’s simply no stopping the tectonic shifts that are soon to shake Washington, D.C. to its rotten core.

    In reality, there’s no stopping the war that’s about to break out in the open. Too many thresholds have already been crossed to prevent what is about to transpire across the USA.

    Patriots everywhere — know in their bones — that the time has come to take back the country before closet communist traitors like Schiff, Pelosi, Obama, Clinton, Biden, Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Comey, Mueller, Lynch, Schumer, Harris, Waters, Warren, Harris, Sanders, Booker, O’Rourke, Swalwell, McCabe, Stzrok, etc., etc., etc. transform the nation into the USSA where “A” ominously stands for Amerika.

    For the uninitiated, the following highly radioactive video provides just a glimpse into this global conspiracy to stealthily collapse the American Republic. This exceptionally prophetic presentation is as serious as it gets and therefore a MUST VIEW.

    How Cultural Marxism Is Implementing this Original Communist Takeover Scheme in the USA (Video)

    Adam Schiff: Deep State’s Primo Drama Queen & Cultural Marxist

    Although it may appear that this whole melodrama is being directed by Adam Schiff, the Kalifornia congressman is merely a pliant pawn doing the bidding of his NWO globalist masters. See: ADAM SCHIFF: Deep State Agent, Serial Leaker and Traitor to the Republic

    Nevertheless, there is perhaps no better demonstration of treason in the House than the nakedly seditious conduct of Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff.

    That he’s even still sitting in that extremely powerful chair clearly indicates that “Shifty Schiff” is a key Deep State operative who was strategically placed to overthrow the POTUS.

    While such a conspiracy of outright treason has happened before, the day-to-day mutinous workings of Congress have never been so transparent (thanks to the Internet).

    Which is what makes this soft coup so surreal: the whole nation is watching this stealthy communist rebellion unfold in real time.

    As the frontman for this subversive enterprise, Schiff was specifically chosen because of how profoundly compromised he has been by Pedogate criminal activity.

    P E D O G A T E: A Global Child Trafficking and Exploitation Crime Syndicate

    Hence, it should come as no surprise that the district Rep. Schiff represents includes Hollywood—the Western Hemisphere capital of the Pedogate criminal enterprise.

    Really, could the globalists have found a better “Drama Queen” than Adam Schiff?

    Every single word the “Grand Inquisitor” utters has been scripted by the CIA’s Mockingbird Media to have maximum effect.

    In this regard, Schiff is merely a covert CIA-contracted inside man and virtual “news anchor” providing the daily talking points for mainstream media to disseminate, which those MSM organs of propaganda dutifully do daily.

    However, there’s a critical back story to Adam Bennett Schiff, which is of paramount importance to understand if investigators are to grasp the true depth and breadth of the global communist conspiracy driving his unparalleled crime spree. As follows:

    The Secret Back Story Behind the Outright Treason of Adam Schiff

    On a purely personal level, it’s also significant that Schiff has been utterly humiliated by his woefully failed attempt to legitimize the patently fake “Russian collusion” narrative.

    No representative in U.S. Congressional history has been so politically devastated as Schiff was when he was exposed as a serial liar, pathological prevaricator and coup co-conspirator.

    And, yet, he not only maintains a seat in the House, he’s still the Intel Chair—WOW!

    How does that happen except according to a blueprint undergirding a highly organized conspiracy to overthrow President Trump. See IMPEACHMENTgate: The Scandal Is Much Worse & Plot Much Thicker Than Anyone Knows

    That complex and convoluted conspiracy, by the way, has been fastidiously engineered by foreign powers, as it has been executed by traitors throughout the U.S. Federal Government who are in the pay of Deep State paymasters. What follows is just one piece of the communist takeover plot, but an exceedingly pivotal piece at that.

    COUP-IN-PROGRESS: Pelosi, the Mafia and the Black Nobility

    Revolt in the House

    Also known as the Purple Revolution, which was inaugurated by Comrade Clinton and her Pedogate partner-in-crime and husband Bill during her extremely provocative concession speech on November 9, 2019, this evolving soft coup to depose Trump proceeds at breakneck speed.

    Soros’s “Purple Revolution” brewing for Trump presidency

    Because of the dramatic uptick of covert operations being undertaken to topple Trump at all costs, GOP members of the House know their own asses are on the line. Should Trump be overthrown, the Republican Party will be effectively dissolved by a soon-to-be engineered Democrat majority in all three branches of government.

    *Just like the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, should these violent marxists ever seize power again, they will first concentrate it, and then consolidate it, in such a way that the US government will morph into a totalitarian form of communist tyranny practically overnight.


    The Republican House and Senate leadership surely see the writing on the wall. They have witnessed despotic conduct on an order never experienced before within the once-hallowed halls of the United States Capitol. See: Grand Inquisitor Adam Schiff Throws the House Into Chaos

    In light of the kangaroo court proceedings being conducted by Schiff and his many Democrat and RINO accomplices, the conservative Republicans understand that there’s only one way out of the mess. And, as this predicament worsens by the day, the vital window to take the Democrats to task for their unmitigated coup d’état is rapidly closing.


    KEY POINT: For the conservative caucus to take such an extraordinary initiative as crashing Schiff’s secret inquisition means the party is over for the Democrats. Their unbridled arrogance and chutzpah will eventually be met with overwhelming force, if need be. The exact time and the place are yet to be determined so as to take them down with the element of surprise.


    Conclusion

    The Democrats have already shown that they are going all out to remove Trump.

    If they’re successful, everything changes in a day and a night.

    While Deep State has executed this soft coup with amazing precision, they are prepared to pull out all the stops at any time. All of their henchmen are disposable in this winner-takes-all endeavor.

    If and when the other shoe drops, the violent bolsheviks will most certainly be let loose according to a scenario not too unlike this: Mass Casualty Event Planned by the Left as a Provocation to Violently Attack the Right.

    The bottom line here is that the President must quell this communist-incited rebellion before it gets totally out of hand. Truly, The time has come for President Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act and put down the lawless, left-wing insurrection against America.

    Should Trump not act pre-emptively, a decisive moment will have passed to avert a Second American Civil War. And, there will be much unnecessary pain and suffering throughout the Republic.

    Therefore, the single most effective move that Trump can make at this defining moment is this: Soros Must Be Arrested, Prosecuted and Imprisoned to Prevent Civil War.

    Along with the incarceration of Soros, Schiff, Pelosi, Clinton & Company, measures can also be taken to swiftly form MILITARY TRIBUNALS: Why They Are Absolutely Necessary.

    Lastly, the quicker that the Attorney General prosecutes those responsible for CROWDSTRIKEgate, the faster the Democrat house of cards will fall—FOR GOOD. [1]

    State of the Nation
    October 24, 2019

    Source [1] CROWDSTRIKEgate: A Massive Deep State Scandal that Will Collapse the Democrat Party

    Navigate reading related topics for ultimate knowing: http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-george-webb/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/intel-report-the-4-interlocking-california-crime-families/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/the-communist-purple-revolution-rages-inside-the-beltway/= this posting

    Share
  • South Korean National and Hundreds of Others Charged Worldwide in the Takedown of the Largest Darknet Child Pornography Website, Which was Funded by Bitcoin

    DOJ-NSD-150x150FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:Wednesday, October 16, 2019

    Dozens of Minor Victims Who Were Being Actively Abused by the Users of the Site Rescued

    Jong Woo Son, 23, a South Korean national, was indicted by a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia for his operation of Welcome To Video, the largest child sexual exploitation market by volume of content. The nine-count indictment was unsealed today along with a parallel civil forfeiture action. Son has also been charged and convicted in South Korea and is currently in custody serving his sentence in South Korea. An additional 337 site users residing in Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington State and Washington, D.C. as well as the United Kingdom, South Korea, Germany, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, the Czech Republic, Canada, Ireland, Spain, Brazil and Australia have been arrested and charged.

    Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Jessie K. Liu for the District of Columbia, Chief Don Fort of IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) and Acting Executive Associate Director Alysa Erichs of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), made the announcement.

    “Darknet sites that profit from the sexual exploitation of children are among the most vile and reprehensible forms of criminal behavior,” said Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “This Administration will not allow child predators to use lawless online spaces as a shield. Today’s announcement demonstrates that the Department of Justice remains firmly committed to working closely with our partners in South Korea and around the world to rescue child victims and bring to justice the perpetrators of these abhorrent crimes.”

    “Children around the world are safer because of the actions taken by U.S. and foreign law enforcement to prosecute this case and recover funds for victims,” said U.S. Attorney Jessie K. Liu. “We will continue to pursue such criminals on and off the darknet in the United States and abroad, to ensure they receive the punishment their terrible crimes deserve.”

    “Through the sophisticated tracing of bitcoin transactions, IRS-CI special agents were able to determine the location of the Darknet server, identify the administrator of the website and ultimately track down the website server’s physical location in South Korea,” said IRS-CI Chief Don Fort. “This largescale criminal enterprise that endangered the safety of children around the world is no more. Regardless of the illicit scheme, and whether the proceeds are virtual or tangible, we will continue to work with our federal and international partners to track down these disgusting organizations and bring them to justice.”

    “Children are our most vulnerable population, and crimes such as these are unthinkable,” said HSI Acting Executive Associate Director Alysa Erichs. “Sadly, advances in technology have enabled child predators to hide behind the dark web and cryptocurrency to further their criminal activity. However, today’s indictment sends a strong message to criminals that no matter how sophisticated the technology or how widespread the network, child exploitation will not be tolerated in the United States. Our entire justice system will stop at nothing to prevent these heinous crimes, safeguard our children, and bring justice to all.”

    According to the indictment, on March 5, 2018, agents from the IRS-CI, HSI, National Crime Agency in the United Kingdom, and Korean National Police in South Korea arrested Son and seized the server that he used to operate a Darknet market that exclusively advertised child sexual exploitation videos available for download by members of the site. The operation resulted in the seizure of approximately eight terabytes of child sexual exploitation videos, which is one of the largest seizures of its kind. The images, which are currently being analyzed by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), contained over 250,000 unique videos, and 45 percent of the videos currently analyzed contain new images that have not been previously known to exist.

    Welcome To Video offered these videos for sale using the cryptocurrency bitcoin. Typically, sites of this kind give users a forum to trade in these depictions. This Darknet website is among the first of its kind to monetize child exploitation videos using bitcoin. In fact, the site itself boasted over one million downloads of child exploitation videos by users. Each user received a unique bitcoin address when the user created an account on the website. An analysis of the server revealed that the website had more than one million bitcoin addresses, signifying that the website had capacity for at least one million users.

    The agencies have shared data from the seized server with law enforcement around the world to assist in identifying and prosecuting customers of the site. This has resulted in leads sent to 38 countries and yielded arrests of 337 subjects around the world. The operation has resulted in searches of residences and businesses of approximately 92 individuals in the United States. Notably, the operation is responsible for the rescue of at least 23 minor victims residing in the United States, Spain and the United Kingdom, who were being actively abused by the users of the site.

    In the Washington, D.C.-metropolitan area, the operation has led to the execution of five search warrants and eight arrests of individuals who both conspired with the administrator of the site and were themselves, users of the website. Two users of the Darknet market committed suicide subsequent to the execution of search warrants.

    Amongst the sites users charged are:

    Charles Wunderlich, 34, of Hot Springs, California, was charged in the District of Columbia with conspiracy to distribute child pornography;

    Brian James LaPrath, 34, of San Diego, California, was arrested in the District of Columbia, for international money laundering; and was sentenced to serve 18 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release;

    Ernest Wagner, 70, of Federal Way, Washington, was arrested and charged in the District of Columbia with conspiracy to distribute child pornography;

    Vincent Galarzo, 28, of Glendale, New York, was arrested and charged in the District of Columbia with conspiracy to distribute child pornography;

    Michael Ezeagbor, 22, of Pflugerville, Texas, was arrested and charged in the District of Columbia with conspiracy to distribute child pornography;

    Nicholas Stengel, 45, of Washington, D.C., pleaded guilty to receipt of child pornography and money laundering and was sentenced to serve 15 years in prison followed by a lifetime of supervised release;

    Eryk Mark Chamberlin, 25, of Worcester, Massachusetts, pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography and is pending sentencing;

    Jairo Flores, 30, of Cambridge, Massachusetts, pleaded guilty in the District of Massachusetts to receipt and possession of child pornography and was sentenced to serve five years in prison followed by five years of supervised release;

    Billy Penaloza, 29, of Dorchester, Massachusetts, pleaded guilty in the District of Massachusetts to possession and receipt of child pornography. His sentencing is scheduled for Oct. 22, 2019;

    Michael Armstrong, 35, of Randolph, Massachusetts, pleaded guilty in the District of Massachusetts, to receipt and possession of child pornography. He was sentenced to serve five years in prison followed by five years of supervised release. Restitution will be determined at a future date;

    Al Ramadhanu Soedomo, 28, of Lynn, Massachusetts, pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography and was sentenced in the District of Massachusetts (Boston), to serve 12 months and one day followed by five years of supervised release;

    Phillip Sungmin Hong, 24, of Sharon, Massachusetts, pleaded guilty in the District of Massachusetts (Boston), to receipt and possession of child pornography and is pending sentencing;

    Eliseo Arteaga Jr., 28, of Mesquite, Texas, pleaded guilty in the Northern District of Texas to possession of prepubescent child pornography. He is pending sentencing;

    Richard Nikolai Gratkowski, 40, of San Antonio, Texas, a former HSI special agent, was arrested in the Western District of Texas. Gratkowski pleaded guilty to the indictment charging one count of receipt of child pornography and one count of access with intent to view child pornography. Gratkowski was sentenced to serve 70 months in prison followed by 10 years of supervised release, and ordered to pay $35,000 in restitution to seven victims and a $10,000 assessment;

    Paul Casey Whipple, 35, of Hondo, Texas, a U.S. Border Patrol Agent, was arrested in the Western District of Texas, on charges of sexual exploitation of children/minors, production, distribution, and possession of child pornography. Whipple remains in custody awaiting trial in San Antonio;

    Michael Lawson, 36, of Midland, Georgia, was arrested in the Middle District of Georgia on charges of attempted sexual exploitation of children and possession of child pornography. He was sentenced to serve 121 months in prison followed by 10 years of supervised release following his plea to a superseding information charging him with one count of receipt of child pornography;

    Kevin Christopher Eagan, 39, of Brookhaven, Georgia, pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography in the Northern District of Georgia;

    Casey Santioius Head, 37, of Griffin, Georgia, was indicted in the Northern District of Georgia for distribution, receipt, and possession of child pornography;

    Andrew C. Chu, 28, of Garwood, New Jersey, was arrested and charged with receipt of child pornography. Those charges remain pending;

    Nader Hamdi Ahmed, 29 of Jersey City, New Jersey, was arrested in the District of New Jersey, for sexual exploitation or other abuse of children. Ahmed pleaded guilty to an information charging him with one count of distribution of child pornography. He is scheduled to be sentenced Oct. 1, 2019;

    Jeffrey Lee Harris, 32, of Pickens, South Carolina, pleaded guilty in the District of South Carolina for producing, distributing, and possessing child pornography;

    Laine Ormand Clark Jr., 27, of Conway, South Carolina, was arrested and charged in U.S. District Court in South Carolina Division for sexual possession of child pornography;

    Jack R. Dove III, 38, of Lakeland, Florida, was arrested in the Middle District of Florida for knowingly receiving and possessing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct;

    Michael Matthew White, 39, of Miami Beach, Florida, was arrested in the Southern District of Florida for coercion and enticement;

    Nikolas Bennion Bradshaw, 24, of Bountiful, Utah, was arrested in the State of Utah, and charged with five counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, and was sentenced to time served with 91 days in jail followed by probation;

    Michael Don Gibbs, 37, of Holladay, Utah, was charged in the District of Utah with receipt of child pornography and possession of child pornography;

    Ammar Atef H. Alahdali, 22, of Arlington, Virginia, pleaded guilty in the Eastern District of Virginia to receipt of child pornography and was sentenced to serve five years in prison and ordered to pay $3,000 in restitution;

    Mark Lindsay Rohrer, 38, of West Hartford, Connecticut, pleaded guilty in the District of Connecticut to receipt of child pornography and was sentenced to serve 60 months in prison followed by five years of supervised release;

    Eugene Edward Jung, 47, of San Francisco, California, was indicted in the Northern District of California on possession of child pornography and receipt of child pornography;

    James Daosaeng, 25, of Springdale, Arkansas, pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography and was sentenced in the Western District of Arkansas (Fayetteville) to serve 97 months in prison followed by 20 years of supervised release;

    Alex Daniel Paxton, 30, of Columbus, Ohio, was arrested and indicted in Franklin County Ohio Court of Common Pleas for pandering sexually oriented matter involving a minor;

    Don Edward Pannell, 32, of Harvey, Louisiana, pleaded guilty in the Eastern District of Louisiana for receipt of child pornography. He is pending sentencing;

    Ryan Thomas Carver, 29, of Huntsville, Alabama, was arrested and charged under Alabama State Law. He was charged federally in the Northern District of Alabama with possession of child pornography. His case is pending in Huntsville, Alabama;

    Alexander Buckley, 28, of the United Kingdom, pleaded guilty to 10 offences in the UK of possession and distribution of indecent images of children, possession of extreme and prohibited images and possession of a class A drug. He was sentenced to serve 40 months in prison for the distribution of indecent images and possession of class A drugs. Buckley is also subject to an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order;

    Kyle Fox, 26, of the United Kingdom, pleaded guilty to 22 counts including rape, sexual assault, and sharing indecent images, and was sentenced to serve 22 years in prison; and

    Mohammed Almaker, 26, of Fort Collins, Colorado, was arrested in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), charged with KSA Law involving the endangerment of children. He is awaiting judicial proceedings in furtherance of criminal charges.

    A forfeiture complaint was also unsealed today. The complaint alleges that law enforcement was able to trace payments of bitcoin to the Darknet site by following the flow of funds on the blockchain. The virtual currency accounts identified in the complaint were allegedly used by 24 individuals in five countries to fund the website and promote the exploitation of children. The forfeiture complaint seeks to recover these funds and, ultimately through the restoration process, return the illicit funds to victims of the crime.

    The charges in the indictment are merely allegations, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    The international investigations were led by the IRS-CI, HSI and the NCA. The Korean National Police of the Republic of Korea, the National Crime Agency of the United Kingdom and the German Federal Criminal Police (the Bundeskriminalamt), provided assistance and coordinated with their parallel investigations. The Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs of the Criminal Division provided significant assistance.

    The cases are being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Zia M. Faruqui, Lindsay Suttenberg, and Youli Lee, Paralegal Specialists Brian Rickers and Diane Brashears, Legal Assistant Jessica McCormick, and Records Examiner Chad Byron of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and Trial Attorney C. Alden Pelker of the Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section. Additional assistance has been provided by Deputy Chief Keith Becker and Trial Attorney James E. Burke IV of the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, and former U.S. Attorney’s Office Paralegal Specialists Toni Anne Donato and Ty Eaton.

    ~ https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/south-korean-national-and-hundreds-others-charged-worldwide-takedown-largest-darknet-child

    http://wetheonepeople.com/south-korean-national-and-hundreds-of-others-charged-worldwide-in-the-takedown-of-the-largest-darknet-child-pornography-website-which-was-funded-by-bitcoin/= this posting

    Share
  • EO 13892 Executive Order on Promoting the Rule of Law Through Transparency and Fairness in Civil Administrative Enforcement and Adjudication

    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

    Section 1.  Policy.  The rule of law requires transparency.  Regulated parties must know in advance the rules by which the Federal Government will judge their actions.  The Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq., was enacted to provide that “administrative policies affecting individual rights and obligations be promulgated pursuant to certain stated procedures so as to avoid the inherently arbitrary nature of unpublished ad hoc determinations.”  Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199, 232 (1974). The Freedom of Information Act, America’s landmark transparency law, amended the APA to further advance this goal.  The Freedom of Information Act, as amended, now generally requires that agencies publish in the Federal Register their substantive rules of general applicability, statements of general policy, and interpretations of law that are generally applicable and both formulated and adopted by the agency (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1)(D)).  The Freedom of Information Act also generally prohibits an agency from adversely affecting a person with a rule or policy that is not so published, except to the extent that the person has actual and timely notice of the terms of the rule or policy (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1)).

    Unfortunately, departments and agencies (agencies) in the executive branch have not always complied with these requirements. In addition, some agency practices with respect to enforcement actions and adjudications undermine the APA’s goals of promoting accountability and ensuring fairness.

    Agencies shall act transparently and fairly with respect to all affected parties, as outlined in this order, when engaged in civil administrative enforcement or adjudication.  No person should be subjected to a civil administrative enforcement action or adjudication absent prior public notice of both the enforcing agency’s jurisdiction over particular conduct and the legal standards applicable to that conduct.  Moreover, the Federal Government should, where feasible, foster greater private-sector cooperation in enforcement, promote information sharing with the private sector, and establish predictable outcomes for private conduct.  Agencies shall afford regulated parties the safeguards described in this order, above and beyond those that the courts have interpreted the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution to impose.

    Sec. 2.  Definitions For the purposes of this order:

    (a)  “Agency” has the meaning given to “Executive agency” in section 105 of title 5, United States Code, but excludes the Government Accountability Office.

    (b)  “Collection of information” includes any conduct that would qualify as a “collection of information” as defined in section 3502(3)(A) of title 44, United States Code, or section 1320.3(c) of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, and also includes any request for information, regardless of the number of persons to whom it is addressed, that is:

    (i)   addressed to all or a substantial majority of an industry; or

    (ii)  designed to obtain information from a representative sample of individual persons in an industry.

    (c)  “Guidance document” means an agency statement of general applicability, intended to have future effect on the behavior of regulated parties, that sets forth a policy on a statutory, regulatory, or technical issue, or an interpretation of a statute or regulation, but does not include the following:

    (i)    rules promulgated pursuant to notice and comment under section 553 of title 5, United States Code, or similar statutory provisions;

    (ii)   rules exempt from rulemaking requirements under section 553(a) of title 5, United States Code;

    (iii)  rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice;

    (iv)   decisions of agency adjudications under section 554 of title 5, United States Code, or similar statutory provisions;

    (v)    internal guidance directed to the issuing agency or other agencies that is not intended to have substantial future effect on the behavior of regulated parties; or

    (vi)   internal executive branch legal advice or legal opinions addressed to executive branch officials.

    (d)  “Legal consequence” means the result of an action that directly or indirectly affects substantive legal rights or obligations.  The meaning of this term should be informed by the Supreme Court’s discussion in U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 1807, 1813–16 (2016), and includes, for example, agency orders specifying which commodities are subject to or exempt from regulation under a statute, Frozen Food Express v. United States, 351 U.S. 40, 44–45 (1956), as well as agency letters or orders establishing greater liability for regulated parties in a subsequent enforcement action, Rhea Lana, Inc. v. Dep’t of Labor, 824 F.3d 1023, 1030 (D.C. Cir. 2016).  In particular, “legal consequence” includes subjecting a regulated party to potential liability.

    (e)  “Unfair surprise” means a lack of reasonable certainty or fair warning of what a legal standard administered by an agency requires.  The meaning of this term should be informed by the examples of lack of fair notice discussed by the Supreme Court in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142, 156 & n.15 (2012).

    (f)  “Pre-enforcement ruling” means a formal written communication from an agency in response to an inquiry from a person concerning compliance with legal requirements that interprets the law or applies the law to a specific set of facts supplied by the person.  The term includes informal guidance under section 213 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121 (Title II), as amended (SBREFA), letter rulings, advisory opinions, and no action letters.

    (g)  “Regulation” means a legislative rule promulgated pursuant to section 553 of title 5, United States Code, or similar statutory provisions.

    Sec. 3.  Proper Reliance on Guidance Documents.  Guidance documents may not be used to impose new standards of conduct on persons outside the executive branch except as expressly authorized by law or as expressly incorporated into a contract.  When an agency takes an administrative enforcement action, engages in adjudication, or otherwise makes a determination that has legal consequence for a person, it must establish a violation of law by applying statutes or regulations.  The agency may not treat noncompliance with a standard of conduct announced solely in a guidance document as itself a violation of applicable statutes or regulations.  When an agency uses a guidance document to state the legal applicability of a statute or regulation, that document can do no more, with respect to prohibition of conduct, than articulate the agency’s understanding of how a statute or regulation applies to particular circumstances.  An agency may cite a guidance document to convey that understanding in an administrative enforcement action or adjudication only if it has notified the public of such document in advance through publication, either in full or by citation if publicly available, in the Federal Register (or on the portion of the agency’s website that contains a single, searchable, indexed database of all guidance documents in effect).

    Sec. 4.  Fairness and Notice in Administrative Enforcement Actions and Adjudications.  When an agency takes an administrative enforcement action, engages in adjudication, or otherwise makes a determination that has legal consequence for a person, it may apply only standards of conduct that have been publicly stated in a manner that would not cause unfair surprise.  An agency must avoid unfair surprise not only when it imposes penalties but also whenever it adjudges past conduct to have violated the law.

    Sec. 5.  Fairness and Notice in Jurisdictional Determinations.  Any decision in an agency adjudication, administrative order, or agency document on which an agency relies to assert a new or expanded claim of jurisdiction — such as a claim to regulate a new subject matter or an explanation of a new basis for liability — must be published, either in full or by citation if publicly available, in the Federal Register (or on the portion of the agency’s website that contains a single, searchable, indexed database of all guidance documents in effect) before the conduct over which jurisdiction is sought occurs.  If an agency intends to rely on a document arising out of litigation (other than a published opinion of an adjudicator), such as a brief, a consent decree, or a settlement agreement, to establish jurisdiction in future administrative enforcement actions or adjudications involving persons who were not parties to the litigation, it must publish that document, either in full or by citation if publicly available, in the Federal Register (or on the portion of the agency’s website that contains a single, searchable, indexed database of all guidance documents in effect) and provide an explanation of its jurisdictional implications.  An agency may not seek judicial deference to its interpretation of a document arising out of litigation (other than a published opinion of an adjudicator) in order to establish a new or expanded claim or jurisdiction unless it has published the document or a notice of availability in the Federal Register (or on the portion of the agency’s website that contains a single, searchable, indexed database of all guidance documents in effect).

    Sec. 6.  Opportunity to Contest Agency Determination.  (a)  Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, before an agency takes any action with respect to a particular person that has legal consequence for that person, including by issuing to such a person a no-action letter, notice of noncompliance, or other similar notice, the agency must afford that person an opportunity to be heard, in person or in writing, regarding the agency’s proposed legal and factual determinations.  The agency must respond in writing and articulate the basis for its action.

    (b)  Subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to settlement negotiations between agencies and regulated parties, to notices of a prospective legal action, or to litigation before courts.

    (c)  An agency may proceed without regard to subsection (a) of this section where necessary because of a serious threat to health, safety, or other emergency or where a statute specifically authorizes proceeding without a prior opportunity to be heard.  Where an agency proceeds under this subsection, it nevertheless must afford any person an opportunity to be heard, in person or in writing, regarding the agency’s legal determinations and respond in writing as soon as practicable.

    Sec. 7.  Ensuring Reasonable Administrative Inspections. Within 120 days of the date of this order, each agency that conducts civil administrative inspections shall publish a rule of agency procedure governing such inspections, if such a rule does not already exist.  Once published, an agency must conduct inspections of regulated parties in compliance with the rule.

    Sec. 8.  Appropriate Procedures for Information Collections. (a)  Any agency seeking to collect information from a person about the compliance of that person or of any other person with legal requirements must ensure that such collections of information comply with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, section 3512 of title 44, United States Code, and section 1320.6(a) of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, applicable to collections of information (other than those excepted under section 3518 of title 44, United States Code).

    (b)  To advance the purposes of subsection (a) of this section, any collection of information during the conduct of an investigation (other than those investigations excepted under section 3518 of title 44, United States Code, and section 1320.4 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, or civil investigative demands under 18 U.S.C. 1968) must either:

    (i)   display a valid control number assigned by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget; or

    (ii)  inform the recipient through prominently displayed plain language that no response is legally required.

    Sec. 9.  Cooperative Information Sharing and Enforcement.  (a)  Within 270 days of the date of this order, each agency, as appropriate, shall, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, propose procedures:

    (i)    to encourage voluntary self-reporting of regulatory violations by regulated parties in exchange for reductions or waivers of civil penalties;

    (ii)   to encourage voluntary information sharing by regulated parties; and

    (iii)  to provide pre-enforcement rulings to regulated parties.

    (b)  Any agency that believes additional procedures are not practicable — because, for example, the agency believes it already has adequate procedures in place or because it believes it lacks the resources to institute additional procedures — shall, within 270 days of the date of this order, submit a report to the President describing, as appropriate, its existing procedures, its need for more resources, or any other basis for its conclusion.

    Sec. 10.  SBREFA Compliance.  Within 180 days of the date of this order, each agency shall submit a report to the President demonstrating that its civil administrative enforcement activities, investigations, and other actions comply with SBREFA, including section 223 of that Act.  A copy of this report, subject to redactions for any applicable privileges, shall be posted on the agency’s website.

    Sec. 11.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

    (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

    (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (b)  This order shall be implemented in a manner consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    (d)  Notwithstanding any other provision in this order, nothing in this order shall apply:

    (i)    to any action that pertains to foreign or military affairs, or to a national security or homeland security function of the United States (other than procurement actions and actions involving the import or export of non-defense articles and services);

    (ii)   to any action related to a criminal investigation or prosecution, including undercover operations, or any civil enforcement action or related investigation by the Department of Justice, including any action related to a civil investigative demand under 18 U.S.C. 1968;

    (iii)  to any action related to detention, seizure, or destruction of counterfeit goods, pirated goods, or other goods that infringe intellectual property rights;

    (iv)   to any investigation of misconduct by an agency employee or any disciplinary, corrective, or employment action taken against an agency employee; or

    (v)    in any other circumstance or proceeding to which application of this order, or any part of this order, would, in the judgment of the head of the agency, undermine the national security.

    ~~~~~~~

    Related: http://wetheonepeople.com/executive-order-promoting-the-rule-of-law-through-improved-agency-guidance-documents/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/eo-13892-executive-order-on-promoting-the-rule-of-law-through-transparency-and-fairness-in-civil-administrative-enforcement-and-adjudication/= this posting

     

    Share
  • POTUS: Trump Signs Executive Orders at the White House, Oct 9, 2019

    trump-signs-executive-orders-10.9.19-300x158POTUS signs Executive Orders on transparency in federal guidance and enforcement

    ~ Executive Order on Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents

    ~ Executive Order on Promoting the Rule of Law Through Transparency and Fairness in Civil Administrative Enforcement and Adjudication

    Read EO here: http://wetheonepeople.com/executive-order-promoting-the-rule-of-law-through-improved-agency-guidance-documents/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/potus-trump-signs-executive-orders-at-the-white-house-oct-9-2019/= this posting

    Share
  • Executive Order Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents

    Executive Order Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents

    Section1.  Policy.  Departments and agencies (agencies) in the executive branch adopt regulations that impose legally binding requirements on the public even though, in our constitutional democracy, only Congress is vested with the legislative power.  The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) generally requires agencies, in exercising that solemn responsibility, to engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking to provide public notice of proposed regulations under section 553 of title 5, United States Code, allow interested parties an opportunity to comment, consider and respond to significant comments, and publish final regulations in the Federal Register.

    Agencies may clarify existing obligations through non binding guidance documents, which the APA exempts from notice-and-comment requirements.  Yet agencies have sometimes used this authority inappropriately in attempts to regulate the public without following the rulemaking procedures of the APA.  Even when accompanied by a disclaimer that it is non-binding, a guidance document issued by an agency may carry the implicit threat of enforcement action if the regulated public does not comply.  Moreover, the public frequently has insufficient notice of guidance documents, which are not always published in the Federal Register or distributed to all regulated parties.

    Americans deserve an open and fair regulatory process that imposes new obligations on the public only when consistent with applicable law and after an agency follows appropriate procedures.  Therefore, it is the policy of the executive branch, to the extent consistent with applicable law, to require that agencies treat guidance documents as non-binding both in law and in practice, except as incorporated into a contract, take public input into account when appropriate in formulating guidance documents, and make guidance documents readily available to the public.  Agencies may impose legally binding requirements on the public only through regulations and on parties on a case-by-case basis through adjudications, and only after appropriate process, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a contract.

    Sec. 2.  Definitions.  For the purposes of this order:

    (a)  “Agency” has the meaning given in section 3(b) of Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), as amended.

    (b)  “Guidance document” means an agency statement of general applicability, intended to have future effect on the behavior of regulated parties, that sets forth a policy on a statutory, regulatory, or technical issue, or an interpretation of a statute or regulation, but does not include the following:

    (i)    rules promulgated pursuant to notice and comment under section 553 of title 5, United States Code, or similar statutory provisions;

    (ii)   rules exempt from rulemaking requirements under section 553(a) of title 5, United States Code;

    (iii)  rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice;

    (iv)   decisions of agency adjudications under section 554 of title 5, United States Code, or similar statutory provisions;

    (v)    internal guidance directed to the issuing agency or other agencies that is not intended to have substantial future effect on the behavior of regulated parties; or

    (vi)   internal executive branch legal advice or legal opinions addressed to executive branch officials.

    (c)  “Significant guidance document” means a guidance document that may reasonably be anticipated to:

    (i)    lead to an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities;

    (ii)   create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;

    (iii)  materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or

    (iv)   raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles of Executive Order 12866.

    (d)  “Pre-enforcement ruling” means a formal written communication by an agency in response to an inquiry from a person concerning compliance with legal requirements that interprets the law or applies the law to a specific set of facts supplied by the person.  The term includes informal guidance under section 213 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121 (Title II), as amended, letter rulings, advisory opinions, and no-action letters.

    Sec. 3.  Ensuring Transparent Use of Guidance Documents.  (a) Within 120 days of the date on which the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issues an implementing memorandum under section 6 of this order, each agency or agency component, as appropriate, shall establish or maintain on its website a single, searchable, indexed database that contains or links to all guidance documents in effect from such agency or component.  The website shall note that guidance documents lack the force and effect of law, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a contract.

    (b)  Within 120 days of the date on which OMB issues an implementing memorandum under section 6 of this order, each agency shall review its guidance documents and, consistent with applicable law, rescind those guidance documents that it determines should no longer be in effect.  No agency shall retain in effect any guidance document without including it in the relevant database referred to in subsection (a) of this section, nor shall any agency, in the future, issue a guidance document without including it in the relevant database.  No agency may cite, use, or rely on guidance documents that are rescinded, except to establish historical facts.  Within 240 days of the date on which OMB issues an implementing memorandum, an agency may reinstate a guidance document rescinded under this subsection without complying with any procedures adopted or imposed pursuant to section 4 of this order, to the extent consistent with applicable law, and shall include the guidance document in the relevant database.

    (c)  The Director of OMB (Director), or the Director’s designee, may waive compliance with subsections (a) and (b) of this section for particular guidance documents or categories of guidance documents, or extend the deadlines set forth in those subsections.

    (d)  As requested by the Director, within 240 days of the date on which OMB issues an implementing memorandum under section 6 of this order, an agency head shall submit a report to the Director with the reasons for maintaining in effect any guidance documents identified by the Director.  The Director shall provide such reports to the President.  This subsection shall apply only to guidance documents existing as of the date of this order.

    Sec. 4.  Promulgation of Procedures for Issuing Guidance Documents.  (a)  Within 300 days of the date on which OMB issues an implementing memorandum under section 6 of this order, each agency shall, consistent with applicable law, finalize regulations, or amend existing regulations as necessary, to set forth processes and procedures for issuing guidance documents.  The process set forth in each regulation shall be consistent with this order and shall include:

    (i)    a requirement that each guidance document clearly state that it does not bind the public, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a contract;

    (ii)   procedures for the public to petition for withdrawal or modification of a particular guidance document, including a designation of the officials to which petitions should be directed; and

    (iii)  for a significant guidance document, as determined by the Administrator of OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (Administrator), unless the agency and the Administrator agree that exigency, safety, health, or other compelling cause warrants an exemption from some or all requirements, provisions requiring:

    (A)  a period of public notice and comment of at least 30 days before issuance of a final guidance document, and a public response from the agency to major concerns raised in comments, except when the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates such finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor into the guidance document) that notice and public comment thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest;

    (B)  approval on a non-delegable basis by the agency head or by an agency component head appointed by the President, before issuance;

    (C)  review by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) under Executive Order 12866, before issuance; and

    (D)  compliance with the applicable requirements for regulations or rules, including significant regulatory actions, set forth in Executive Orders 12866, 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), 13609 (Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation), 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs), and 13777 (Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda).

    (b)  The Administrator shall issue memoranda establishing exceptions from this order for categories of guidance documents, and categorical presumptions regarding whether guidance documents are significant, as appropriate, and may require submission of significant guidance documents to OIRA for review before the finalization of agency regulations under subsection (a) of this section.  In light of the Memorandum of Agreement of April 11, 2018, this section and section 5 of this order shall not apply to the review relationship (including significance determinations) between OIRA and any component of the Department of the Treasury, or to compliance by the latter with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 13609, 13771, and 13777.  Section 4(a)(iii) and section 5 of this order shall not apply to pre-enforcement rulings.

    Sec. 5.  Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13609.  The requirements and procedures of Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13609 shall apply to guidance documents, consistent with section 4 of this order.

    Sec. 6.  Implementation.  The Director shall issue memoranda and, as appropriate, regulations pursuant to sections 3504(d)(1) and 3516 of title 44, United States Code, and other appropriate authority, to provide guidance regarding or otherwise implement this order.

    Sec. 7.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

    (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

    (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    (d)  Notwithstanding any other provision in this order, nothing in this order shall apply:

    (i)    to any action that pertains to foreign or military affairs, or to a national security or homeland security function of the United States (other than guidance documents involving procurement or the import or export of non-defense articles and services);

    (ii)   to any action related to a criminal investigation or prosecution, including undercover operations, or any civil enforcement action or related investigation by the Department of Justice, including any action related to a civil investigative demand under 18 U.S.C. 1968;

    (iii)  to any investigation of misconduct by an agency employee or any disciplinary, corrective, or employment action taken against an agency employee;

    (iv)   to any document or information that is exempt from disclosure under section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the Freedom of Information Act); or

    (v)    in any other circumstance or proceeding to which application of this order, or any part of this order, would, in the judgment of the head of the agency, undermine the national security.

    DONALD J. TRUMP

    THE WHITE HOUSE,
    October 9, 2019.

    ~~~~~~~~~

    Related: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-combating-bureaucratic-abuse-holding-federal-agencies-accountable/

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/acting-omb-director-vought-trump-keeps-promise-tame-bureaucracy-runs-roughshod-americans/

    Video from EO: http://wetheonepeople.com/potus-trump-signs-executive-orders-at-the-white-house-oct-9-2019/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/executive-order-promoting-the-rule-of-law-through-improved-agency-guidance-documents/= this posting

    Share