Category: Break the Chains

In order to be free we must unlearn what we have learned.

  • Press Conference Video about the Election Fraud: Mind Blowing

    At the conclusion of the Constitutional Convention. a woman approached Benjamin Franklin and asked, Well, Doctor… what have we a got, a republic or a monarchy? Franklin replied, A republic. If you can keep it. Library of Congress. 73.

    Take time to watch this Press Conference Video concerning the 2020 Election Fraud in the United States. This in fact has been a worldwide crime spree. We are Vomiting. Do your due diligence, and share so we can inform our people what is at stake here.

    http://wetheonepeople.com/press-conference-video-about-the-election-fraud-mind-blowing/ = this posting

    Share
  • Establishing the President’s Advisory 1776 Commission

    fullsizeoutput_19acExecutive Order 13958 of November 2, 2020

    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to better enable a rising generation to understand the history and principles of the founding of the United States in 1776, and, through this, form a more perfect Union, it is hereby ordered as follows:

    Section 1. Purpose. The American founding envisioned a political order in harmony with the design of “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” seeing the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as embodied in and sanctioned by natural law and its traditions.

    The formation of a republic around these principles marked a clear departure from previous forms of government, securing rights through a form of government that derives its legitimate power from the consent of the governed. Throughout its national life, our Republic’s exploration of the full meaning of these principles has led it through the ratification of a Constitution, civil war, the abolition of slavery, Reconstruction, and a series of domestic crises and world conflicts. Those events establish a clear historical record of an exceptional Nation dedicated to the ideas and ideals of its founding.

    Against this history, in recent years, a series of polemics grounded in poor scholarship has vilified our Founders and our founding. Despite the virtues and accomplishments of this Nation, many students are now taught in school to hate their own country, and to believe that the men and women who built it were not heroes, but rather villains. This radicalized view of American history lacks perspective, obscures virtues, twists motives, ignores or distorts facts, and magnifies flaws, resulting in the truth being concealed and history disfigured. Failing to identify, challenge, and correct this distorted perspective could fray and ultimately erase the bonds that knit our country and culture together.

    The recent attacks on our founding have highlighted America’s history related to race. These one-sided and divisive accounts too often ignore or fail to properly honor and recollect the great legacy of the American national experience—our country’s valiant and successful effort to shake off the curse of slavery and to use the lessons of that struggle to guide our work toward equal rights for all citizens in the present. Viewing America as an irredeemably and systemically racist country cannot account for the extraordinary role of the great heroes of the American movement against slavery and for civil rights—a great moral endeavor that, from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King, Jr., was marked by religious fellowship, good will, generosity of heart, an emphasis on our shared principles, and an inclusive vision for the future.

    As these heroes demonstrated, the path to a renewed and confident national unity is through a rediscovery of a shared identity rooted in our founding principles. A loss of national confidence in these principles would place rising generations in jeopardy of a crippling self-doubt that could cause them to abandon faith in the common story that binds us to one another across our differences. Without our common faith in the equal right of every individual American to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, authoritarian visions of government and society could become increasingly alluring alternatives to self-government based on the consent of the people. Thus it is necessary to provide America’s young people access to what Start Printed Page 70952is genuinely inspiring and unifying in our history, as well as to the lessons imparted by the American experience of overcoming great national challenges. This is what makes possible the informed and honest patriotism that is essential for a successful republic.

    A restoration of American education grounded in the principles of our founding that is accurate, honest, unifying, inspiring, and ennobling must ultimately succeed at the local level. Parents and local school boards must be empowered to achieve greater choice and variety in curriculum at the State and local levels.

    The role of the Federal Government is to protect and preserve State and local control over the curriculum, program of instruction, administration, and personnel of educational institutions, schools, and school systems. Indeed, that is why my Administration rejects the Common Core curriculum and all efforts to have the Federal Government impose a national curriculum or national standards in education.

    Vigorous participation in local government has always been America’s laboratory of liberty and a key to what makes us exceptional. The best way to preserve the story of America’s founding principles is to live it in action by local communities reasserting control of how children receive patriotic education in their schools.

    Sec. 2. The President’s Advisory 1776 Commission. (a) Within 120 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Education shall establish in the Department of Education the President’s Advisory 1776 Commission (“the 1776 Commission”) to better enable a rising generation to understand the history and principles of the founding of the United States in 1776 and to strive to form a more perfect Union.

    (b) The 1776 Commission shall be composed of not more than 20 members, who shall be appointed by the President. Members shall serve for a term of 2 years and shall not be removed except for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. The 1776 Commission may include individuals from outside the Federal Government with relevant experience or subject-matter expertise. The 1776 Commission shall also include the following ex-officio members or such senior officials as those members may designate:

    (i) the Secretary of State;

    (ii) the Secretary of Defense;

    (iii) the Secretary of the Interior;

    (iv) the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development;

    (v) the Secretary of Education;

    (vi) the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy; and

    (vii) the Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs.

    (c) The 1776 Commission shall:

    (i) produce a report for the President, within 1 year of the date of this order, which shall be publicly disseminated, regarding the core principles of the American founding and how these principles may be understood to further enjoyment of “the blessings of liberty” and to promote our striving “to form a more perfect Union.” The Commission may solicit statements and contributions from intellectual and cultural figures in addition to the views of the Commission members;

    (ii) advise and offer recommendations to the President and the United States Semiquincentennial Commission regarding the Federal Government’s plans to celebrate the 250th anniversary of American Independence and coordinate with relevant external stakeholders on their plans;

    (iii) facilitate the development and implementation of a “Presidential 1776 Award” to recognize student knowledge of the American founding, including knowledge about the Founders, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitutional Convention, and the great soldiers and battles of the American Revolutionary War;Start Printed Page 70953

    (iv) advise executive departments and agencies (agencies) with regard to their efforts to ensure patriotic education—meaning the presentation of the history of the American founding and foundational principles, the examination of how the United States has grown closer to those principles throughout its history, and the explanation of why commitment to America’s aspirations is beneficial and justified—is provided to the public at national parks, battlefields, monuments, museums, installations, landmarks, cemeteries, and other places important to the American Revolution and the American founding, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law;

    (v) advise agencies on prioritizing the American founding in Federal grants and initiatives, including those described in section 4 of this order, and as appropriate and consistent with applicable law; and

    (vi) facilitate, advise upon, and promote other activities to support public knowledge and patriotic education on the American Revolution and the American founding, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law.

    (d) The 1776 Commission shall have a Chair and Vice Chair, designated by the President from among its members. An Executive Director, designated by the Secretary of Education in consultation with the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, shall coordinate the work of the 1776 Commission. The Chair and Vice Chair shall work with the Executive Director to convene regular meetings of the 1776 Commission, determine its agenda, and direct its work, consistent with this order.

    (e) The Department of Education shall provide funding and administrative support for the 1776 Commission, to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (f) Members of the 1776 Commission shall serve without compensation but shall be reimbursed for travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law for persons serving intermittently in the Government service (5 U.S.C. 5701-5707).

    (g) Insofar as the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), may apply to the 1776 Commission, any functions of the President under that Act, except that of reporting to the Congress, shall be performed by the Secretary of Education, in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Administrator of General Services.

    (h) The 1776 Commission shall terminate 2 years from the date of this order, unless extended by the President.

    Sec. 3. Celebration of Constitution Day. All relevant agencies shall monitor compliance with Title I of Division J of Public Law 108-447, which provides that “each educational institution that receives Federal funds for a fiscal year shall hold an educational program on the United States Constitution on September 17 of such year for the students served by the educational institution,” including by verifying compliance with each educational institution that receives Federal funds. All relevant agencies shall take action, as appropriate, to enhance compliance with that law.

    Sec. 4. Prioritize the American Founding in Available Federal Resources.The following agencies shall prioritize Federal resources, consistent with applicable law, to promote patriotic education:

    (a) the Department of Education, through the American History and Civics Academies and American History and Civics Education-National Activities;

    (b) the Department of Defense, through the Pilot Program on Enhanced Civics Education; and

    (c) the Department of State, through the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, and through opportunities in the Fulbright, U.S. Speakers, and International Visitors Leadership programs, as well as in American Spaces.

    Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:Start Printed Page 70954

    (i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

    (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    page4image2699905952

      THE WHITE HOUSE, November 2, 2020. Filed 11-4-20; 11:15 am]

    ~~~~~~~

    http://wetheonepeople.com/establishing-the-presidents-advisory-1776-commission/ = this posting

    Share
  • Thread: Are we Going Through 10 Days of Darkness after the Election?

    PunisherPatriot Profile picture

    THREAD: Omg take the time to read this! 10 days of darkness. We’ve read about this on the cue boards for years. There have been many times where many, including myself, have thought we were in it. But all of us were wrong.

    Trump won the election.

    And then overnight, he had it stolen from him. We’ve had to watch the trolls dance on Trump’s metaphorical grave and celebrate the fall of America and the rise of socialism. 4 days later, plenty of proof of cheating, and they announce Joe Biden as the President Elect, projected, of course.

    I get messages every day from hurt Trump supporters who think what’s the use? We can’t win without cheating and we can’t stop them. And in the end, we still lost.

    And where again is Bill Barr? Why hasn’t he gotten involved yet?

    Valid questions. What if I told you Trump WANTED to lose? What if I told you that losing by way of cheating from the other side was the plan? It’s about exposure and optics. Trump HAD to win in a landslide, and he did.

    So that the amount of cheating required for the Dems to win would need to be SO VAST that it would be IMPOSSIBLE to hide it. Had Trump overcome like he did in 2016, there would’ve been no legal battle over it. The lower courts would have thrown them out, like they are right now (except for PA). The Supreme Court wouldn’t have heard it since it was both left leaning and there wasn’t an emergency situation that involved national security. But losing with a conservative lean in the courts, with mounds of evidence, was the play. Evidence that is impossible to deny.

    Now by the constitution, if the race is close, then Congress can decide the winner.

    This is why they cheated just enough to edge out a win for Biden so that if Trump challenged and couldn’t get a supreme court case, they could just decide in favor of Biden. Stay with me, I know this is a long one. I’m going to clean it up for you in a bit.

    The Dems think they have the optics on this one by declaring Biden the winner. But here’s the thing, this race isn’t even close to over. Here’s why, (Patriot Joe M had his tweeter account suspended over this comment): “Patriots, be warned. President Trump has legally ‘claimed’ the states he knows he won fairly. The counting going on is now just a formality because the intent is to settle in court, not at the counting stations. If he loses this count, it means nothing because this election will be Amy Coney Barrett’s to decide. I promise and guarantee you, Biden will never be sworn in as President.” Twitter took him down hours later. Not the post, the entire account. What is he talking about? He used the key words, “legally claimed” when referring to Trumps victory. In other words Trump will lose the election optically, but the court will say he won. I know that sounds crazy to you but let me tell you why this is true.

    Biden won the count. Cheating or not, he won the count. That’s a fact, but the states that kept accepting and counting ballots after the day of the election are in violation of their own state laws. What am I talking about? PA has laws on the books that states they cannot accept any new ballots that arrive AFTER the day of the election, anything coming in afterward is invalid. You’re probably thinking, “well the supreme court of PA overrode that law in a court ruling and gave them 3 more days to collect.” And you would be right. But according to how the governmental system is set up, the courts can’t create law. They can only ENFORCE the law that is already on the books. In order for the state to follow the direction of the Supreme court of their state, they need to actually go back and rewrite the laws to REFLECT the court’s decision.

    Understand this. Every day is an IQ test because these morons NEVER rewrote ANY laws to make the states supreme court ruling legally binding. “Why OTHER states were this careless and lazy with the legal process?” you ask? Over 30 states did the SAME THING in violation of their OWN LAWS by counting new votes after election day. In other words, all these trucks coming in at 2 and 3 in the morning on November 4th and beyond are invalid. Biden may have “won the count”, but only because they kept counting invalid votes for days after the election ended.

    The Supreme Court of the United States will not count those votes. And since Trump was in the lead when the election ended, he is the legitimate legal president. This is why I kept telling you all that ACB was the Trump card. The NUCLEAR card would be martial law and mass arrests but that’s a very dangerous call for the country.

    To win legally in the court system, was the Trump card, people, and while in the court they can unload all the evidence to show mass cheating.

    In Michigan. They discovered a glitch in the vote tally system. After votes were cast in one county, over 6000 votes for Trump “glitched” over into Biden votes. Glitched. Well, this software was used in 47 other counties in Michigan, and used all over the COUNTRY. If they all averaged the same number of vote glitches, that’s well into the MILLIONS of votes that were  altered after cast.

    Here is the interesting part. The ballot machines were ALL connected to the internet. Yes, they are supposed to be to linked to inTRAnet. Meaning internal computer networks of that one facility but they’re not supposed to be linked to the world wide web. Sydney Powell, General Flynn’s attorney, said that they discovered an algorithm that calculated how many votes Biden needed to win. She said they found out the machines were transferring just enough votes from Trump to Biden so that he could win. That’s why they were doing “recounts” and we kept seeing Trumps numbers go DOWN, and Biden’s go UP in various states. Now here’s the “you can’t make this stuff up” part. The software that the machines are using to tally up the votes is owned and controlled by Paul Pelosi.

    Yes, Nancy Pelosi’s husband!!

    He not only sits ON the board of the software company that tallies the votes, he majority OWNER of it. So these “glitches” that only “glitch” in one direction isn’t a glitch, it’s a computer program designed to do all of this without any of us knowing it. It does it so fast that we couldn’t even detect it during the actual counting.

    This is how they were able to call states 10 minutes after the elections closed. The algorithm calculated a Biden win based on information they entered into the system.

    Patriots, so if Sydney Powell has this information, you KNOW the DOJ does. And they probably have more that will come out in the Supreme Court hearings.

    The DOJ. Where are they? They have the goods. They don’t need the courts to tell them to arrest, just the command from POTUS. Why are they so quiet?

    10 days of darkness. It wasn’t what we thought, people. It wasn’t 10 days of media blackout, 10 days of social media blackout. 10 days of darkness to a period of time where cue went dark, the President lost the election! and it looks like were headed to a socialist government. The DOJ by constitutional law they can’t get involved with the election until 10 days after election day.

    10 days. The election was on November 3rd, by law they have to wait until the 14th to get involved.

    It doesn’t mean they can’t make arrests. They can arrest some small time players that were involved with the plot. I’m told from a reliable source last night that a few of these arrests will happen next week sometime. But after 10 days

    Barr can arrest anyone from the intern in the Biden break room to Biden himself!

    Cue said the first big arrest will shock you. I can’t see another shocking thing that the “President-Elect” of the United States getting arrested for treason, ballot fraud and crimes against humanity. So Sit back, grab your popcorn and watch the movie. The Patriots are in control. We are in the storm!

    http://wetheonepeople.com/thread-are-we-going-through-10-days-of-darkness-after-the-election/ = this posting

     

    Share
  • Boom! We Know All. We See All

    Boom! We Know All. We See All


    2AC3C2AF-8225-4A3A-9BA0-811C7F99728A
    Give time for the culprits with the election fraud exposed themselves nationwide and worldwide, and then the American people shall bury them ALL as so rightfully they deserve.
    Must watch video about the latest election fraud of 2020.

    http://wetheonepeople.com/boom-we-know-all-we-see-all/ = this posting

    Share
  • Rot in Jail as so Lawfully you Deserve, Magnificent Fuckwit

    ****SUNDAY FEATURES****MUST PAY PER USE, OK FOR WEB***** Keith Raniere, the founder of Nxivm, in 2009. He ordered women to diet and punished those who disobeyed his edict to have sex only with him, former followers said. Credit...Patrick Dodson

    Let this be a clear message to the children’s predators/ murderers, and pedophiles in this country or worldwide. There is no place for you to hide, and when they find you, you are going to go down as with bullets raining on you, and or life in prison as the perverse demon, Keith Ranaire deserved. Remember this.

    Read More:

    Nxivm leader Keith Raniere was slammed with 120 years behind bars Tuesday for running a twisted sex-slave cult where women were branded like cattle and forced to sleep with him.

    The 60-year-old convicted sicko — who billed himself as a Ghandi for the wayward, only to be unmasked as a perverted master manipulator — had faced as little as 15 years on seven felony charges ranging from sex-trafficking to racketeering, child pornography and forced labor.

    But Brooklyn federal Judge Nicholas Garaufis ensured that Raniere would remain in prison for life, saying he has yet to show any remorse for his crimes.

    “To him, the brave victims … are liars,’’ Garaufis said in bringing down the gavel on the sex-trafficker, including ordering him to pay a $1.72 million fine.

    “Mr. Raniere remains unmoved. … [He] has therefore failed to demonstrate remorse,’’ instead maintaining “to this day that he’s done nothing wrong,” the judge said.

    Raniere stood stoically as he was slapped with the life sentence.

    Over the course of the day, a slew of victims appeared before the judge to tell their tales of sexual, physical and mental abuse at Raniere’s hands.

    The cult leader then addressed the judge as his accusers stared at him.

    “I do believe strongly that I’m innocent of the charges,’’ Raniere said. “But it’s also true I see all of this pain.

    “They’re lying for a reason, and that reason stems from me,’’ he said.

    “I do feel deep remorse, but I do not feel remorseful for the crimes I did not commit.’’

    Raniere then even looked at his accusers — and lauded them for speaking in court, even though he said they were lying.

    Those who spoke against him at the hearing included his first sex slave, who finally broke her silence to tell the judge that the cult leader took her virginity at age 15.

    India Oxenberg, the daughter of TV actress Catherine Oxenberg, also said Raniere starved her to make her look like a 12-year-old while raping her.

    At trial, other former Nxivm members testified that they also were turned into sex slaves, with Raniere branding them above their genitals with his initials, making them wear dog collars and go to bed with him, starving them and forcing them to have sex with others.

    Raniere allegedly got three sisters from Mexico pregnant at one point — then ordered them to have abortions. He locked one of them in a single room for two years because she kissed another man, the woman said.

    Judge Garaufis was expected to come down hard on the convict.

    Last month, the jurist sentenced Raniere cohort and Seagram’s booze heiress Clare Bronfman to more than six years in prison, which was nearly triple what federal guidelines called for and greater than even the term prosecutors had sought.

    Raniere on Tuesday asked the judge to go easy on Bronfman, as well as his other cohorts.

    ~New York Post

    ~~~~~~

    http://wetheonepeople.com/rot-in-jail-as-so-lawfully-you-deserve-magnificent-fuckwit/ = this post

    Share
  • Law and Order: Make America Great Again

    Law and Order: Make America Great Again

    019C3DEF-348D-49D0-AA88-86762C8C0383Listen Carefully to what President Donald Trump and Judge Amy Barrett are saying during Amy confirmation to the Supreme Court. Their message is for us all American keeping in mind for ever. And especially during these changing and challenging times we are navigating through. These as well should send a clear message to the domestic liars and traitors,+ and foreign agents that wants to destroy our country from within. Fuck Not with the laws of our country and our people.

    Congratulations Amy Barrett! And thank you President Trump. And thank you Almighty, thank you! Victory of the light!❤️

    http://wetheonepeople.com/law-and-order-make-america-great-again/ = this posting

     

    Share
  • 50,000 Alleged Sex- Abuse Victims Expected to Sue the Boys Scouts

    50,000 Alleged Sex- Abuse Victims Expected to Sue the Boys Scouts

    As many as 50,000 alleged sex-abuse victims are expected to go after the Boy Scouts of America in court ahead of a November legal deadline, as a shocking new study concludes scouting just isn’t safe for kids.

    Since the Boys Scouts of America’s February bankruptcy filing, about 35,000 alleged victims across the nation have filed claims, with “thousands” more emerging each week ahead of the Nov. 16 deadline.

    “People are just coming forward in droves,” said lawyer Andrew Van Arsdale, whose AVA Law firm has joined with two other firms to create the coalition Abused in Scouting.

    The sheer number of Boy Scout victims so far has dwarfed similar cases, noted lawyer Jason Amala of the firm Pfau, Cochran, Vertetis, Amala.

    “It’s three to four times the claims filed in all the Catholic bankruptcies combined,” Amala said.

    Advocacy group Child USA used anonymous data from 1,576 Abused in Scouting plaintiffs to compile a chilling look at sex abuse in scouting.

    The study, to be released next week, shows more than 70 percent of alleged victims were abused multiple times, with more than 50 percent of the incidents taking place at Scout camps and nearly 100 percent of victims suffering lifelong consequences, including alcohol and drug problems, post traumatic stress disorder, difficulties holding down jobs and intimacy issues.

    Accused abusers threatened their victims more than half the time, while 45 percent groomed victims with gifts, and 63 percent gained the trust of victims’ families, the study found.

    70 percent of alleged victims were abused multiple times, with more than 50 percent of the incidents taking place at Scout camps

    “Scouts is mistaken in their belief that teaching a child to build a fire or earn a badge is equivalent to situational strength,” the researchers wrote, noting that allowing kids to go with strangers into the woods without parents, safe places or law enforcement “creates repeated instances in which children are susceptible to abuse.”

    The Boy Scouts model is “doomed to fail” in terms of protecting children, Child USA founder Marci Hamilton told The Post.

    “It’s highly problematic,” she said, adding, “It’s so important that parents have the facts, and if they have the facts they’ll do the right thing.”

    Child USA social scientist and researcher Carter Timon said, “Most people do not know that claims of sexual abuse are rarely, rarely false.”

    In scouting, the overwhelming majority of abuse perpetrators — 82 percent — are adults, with just 3.8 percent being youths themselves, said Timon, who added that typically one-third of child sex abusers are kids.

    Calling the finding “surprising,” Timon noted, “there’s something going on in this setting that makes it way more likely for adults to abuse a child than is typical.”

    Victims, on average, were abused around the age of 12, and took nearly 30 years to come forward — including one former Scout who first revealed his abuse when he was 94, Timon said.

    “These people are suffering, most of them for their whole lives,” he said.

    It’s a story Jeff Williams, 49, can relate to. He was just 9 when he was abused for two years by an assistant scout leader in his native Ohio. Now a married father of two who has filed against the Boy Scouts in bankruptcy court, he urged others to come forward.

    “There’s safety in numbers. … We all share a story,” he said. “It’s tremendous to know you’re not floating out there alone.”

    The Boy Scouts says it  is “committed to compensating victims through its restructuring,” and said the study information was “unverified.”

    The group says it has banned one-on-one interactions between adults and scouts since 1987, and done criminal background checks since 1994.

    According to its own research, 90 percent of Boy Scouts abuse claims occurred “more than 30 years ago,” said the organization, which calls the safety of children its “most important priority.”

    The Boy Scouts also called for a federally overseen national database for all youth-serving organizations, to prevent abusers from going from one organization to another.

    Scouts Dishonor

    39DA24A7-338E-41B9-BFE2-A7662308E923

     

    A Child USA study of reported sex abuse in the Boy Scouts found:

      • 94% of cases involved Scout leaders who had one-on-one contact with a child
      • 82% of perpetrators were adults; 3.8% were youths
      • 79% of abuse occurred at a camp, meeting or activity
      • 71% of victims were abused multiple times
      • 64% of attackers stayed in Scouting after the abuse was reported
      • 20% of victims were abused by more than one person

    ~~~~~
    Related:http://wetheonepeople.com/ten-men-sentenced-to-prison-for-their-roles-in-a-child-exploitation-enterprise-and-conspiracy/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/50000-alleged-sex-abuse-victims-expected-to-sue-the-boys-scouts/  = this posting

    Share
  • Benghazi-Bomshell- Timing is Everything!

    A4D7F117-A532-48B9-9710-D47B049ADD7A_4_5005_chttps://puresocial.tv/benghazi-bombsh… BREAKING: Allen Harrow Parrot (CIA whistleblower) tells Charles Woods (father of Tyrone Woods killed in Benghazi) that Obama and Biden sent Iran 152 Billion Dollars as a coverup for the deaths of Seal Team 6. https://twitter.com/Annakhait/status/… Allen said that ALL of the proof will come out: documents and audio.

    More

    Related: http://wetheonepeople.com/president-trumps-war-on-human-trafficking/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/benghazi-bomshell-timing-is-everything/ = this posting

    Share
  • President Trump’s War on Human Trafficking

    3498CC5E-27F1-459D-A879-BE7EE7BF35D9_4_5005_cPresident Trump’s administration has made ending human trafficking a priority of his administration since day one of his presidency. Trump has done more to fight the war on sex trafficking than any president in history. This is the report you’ll never see in the mainstream media.

    Related: http://wetheonepeople.com/ten-men-sentenced-to-prison-for-their-roles-in-a-child-exploitation-enterprise-and-conspiracy/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/president-trumps-war-on-human-trafficking/  = this posting

     

    Share
  • Ten Men Sentenced to Prison for their Roles in A Child Exploitation Enterprise and Conspiracy

    fullsizeoutput_19acTen men from around the country have been sentenced for participating in a child pornography enterprise and conspiracy, Acting Assistant Attorney General Brian Rabbitt of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania announced today.

    U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle III for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania imposed the following sentences:

    • Andrew Dowdle, aka “Chigger,” 48, of Oswego, New York, was sentenced on Sept. 23, 2019, to 16 years in prison, followed by 15 years supervised release. He pleaded guilty on April 8, 2019.
    • Carl Masters, aka “Harmon,” 45, of Lawrence, Kansas, was sentenced on Sept. 24, 2019, to 27 years in prison, followed by lifetime supervised release. He pleaded guilty on April 25, 2019.
    • Ric Crossfield, aka “Officer Branner,” 25, of Jamaica, New York, was sentenced on Sept. 25, 2019, to 14 years in prison, followed by 40 years supervised release. He pleaded guilty on April 18, 2019.
    • Christian Brennan, aka “Choad,” 46, of Puyallup, Washington, was sentenced on Nov. 7, 2019, to 20 years in prison, followed by 10 years supervised release. He pleaded guilty on April 23, 2019.
    • Sharif El-Battouty, aka “Fritos,” 39, of Woodside, New York, was sentenced on March 16, 2020, to 30 years in prison, followed by lifetime supervised release. He was found guilty at trial on May 2, 2019.
    • Jarrett Lea, aka “Toot,” 27, of Charlotte, North Carolina, was sentenced on Oct. 1 2020, to 17 years in prison, followed by 15 years of supervised release. He pleaded guilty on April 15, 2019.
    • David Minnichelli, aka “Davis,” 30 of Califon, New Jersey, was sentenced on July 28, 2020, to 15 years in prison, followed by lifetime supervised release. He pleaded guilty on Oct. 22, 2019.
    • Marqueal Bonds, aka “The Goat,” 22, of Chicago, Illinois, was sentenced on Aug. 18, 2020, to 22 years in prison, followed by lifetime supervised release. He pleaded guilty on March 5, 2020.
    • Timothy Friel, aka “JJChuck,” 40 of Penndel, Pennsylvania, was sentenced on March 19, 2020, to 12 years in prison, followed by 15 years supervised release. He pleaded guilty on Aug. 24, 2018.

    U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle for the Western District of Washington imposed the following sentence:

    • Cory Crosby, aka “The 191,” 39, of Tacoma, Washington, was sentenced on April 1, 2019, to 25 years in prison, followed by lifetime supervised release. He pleaded guilty on July 18, 2018.

    “The defendants collaborated in a sophisticated conspiracy to deceive, manipulate, and extort hundreds of unsuspecting and vulnerable children, tricking them into creating sexually explicit content by posing as their peers on live-streaming video chat applications,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Brian C. Rabbitt of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division.  “These significant sentences reflect the Department’s commitment to uncovering such nefarious schemes and protecting our most innocent from exploitation by online predators.”

    “Jarret Lea and his co-conspirators caused irreparable harm to over 170 identified child victims,” said U.S. Attorney William McSwain for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  “These men shrouded their true identities in the anonymity of the internet and presented themselves as their victims’ peers in order to gain these children’s trust and exploit them sexually.  The lengthy sentences handed out for this despicable behavior will not restore the innocence lost, but they do send a strong message that my office will find and prosecute child predators, no matter where they lurk.”

    “In order to ensure themselves a steady supply of new child pornography, these predators conspired to befriend, manipulate, and sexually exploit scores of minors online,” said Special Agent in Charge Michael J. Driscoll of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division.  “The defendants thought they could hide behind fake names and handles and continue their violations with impunity.  The FBI is proud to have fully unmasked them, shut them down, and brought them to justice.”

    According to court documents, between November 2016 and July 2018, these defendants, and other co-conspirators outside of the United States, utilized chatrooms on the online service “Discord” – an application designed for online gaming communities that allows users to engage in text chat and share images and videos – to produce and exchange child pornography.  These chatrooms were accessed by invitation only.  Those who gained access to the chatrooms actively worked together to identify social media platforms and profiles of minor females, including girls as young as 10 years old, and strategized regarding how to convince the children to engage in sexually explicit activity via live web camera.  The group targeted live-streaming video chat applications such as Live.Me, Periscope, YouNow, Kik, Musically and Snapchat to target and entice the minors to engage in sexually explicit conduct.

    While pretending to be minor boys and girls, the defendants streamed pre-recorded videos of other underage minors engaging in similar conduct to the targeted victims in an effort to get the minors to believe they were watching a live video of someone their own age.  The victims were unaware that they were communicating with adult men who were recording their sexually explicit activity.  After successfully recording a victim, the defendants shared the sexually explicit videos with each other by uploading the files to file-storage sites and placing a link to download the file on a section of their members-only chatroom.  To date, 172 minor victims have been positively identified.

    Four of the co-conspirators each pleaded guilty to one count of engaging in a child exploitation enterprise and one count of advertising child pornography.  Three of the co-conspirators pleaded guilty to one count of advertising child pornography.  Two of the co-conspirators pleaded guilty to one count of engaging in a child exploitation enterprise. Additionally, Cory Crosby, who was prosecuted in the Western District of Washington pleaded guilty to one count of engaging in a child exploitation enterprise, one count of producing child pornography and one count of possession of child pornography.

    Trial Attorneys Kaylynn Foulon and Lauren Britsch of the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin Jayne and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Seth Schlessinger of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Hampton of the Western District of Washington prosecuted the cases. The FBI Philadelphia and Tacoma Field Offices and investigated the case with assistance from Operation Rescue Me, the Digital Analysis and Research Center (DARC) Lab and CEOS’s High Technology Investigative Unit.

    This case is brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse, launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice.  Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and CEOS, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims.  For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit http://www.justice.gov/psc.

    ~~~~~~~~

    Related: http://wetheonepeople.com/national-health-care-fraud-and-opioid-takedown-results-in-charges-against-345-defendants/

    http://wetheonepeople.com/ten-men-sentenced-to-prison-for-their-roles-in-a-child-exploitation-enterprise-and-conspiracy/ = this posting

    Share
  • Executive Order on Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping

    fullsizeoutput_19ac

    LAW & JUSTICE: Issued on:

    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act, 40 U.S.C. 101 et seq., and in order to promote economy and efficiency in Federal contracting, to promote unity in the Federal workforce, and to combat offensive and anti-American race and sex stereotyping and scapegoating, it is hereby ordered as follows:

    Section 1. Purpose. From the battlefield of Gettysburg to the bus boycott in Montgomery and the Selma-to-Montgomery marches, heroic Americans have valiantly risked their lives to ensure that their children would grow up in a Nation living out its creed, expressed in the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.” It was this belief in the inherent equality of every individual that inspired the Founding generation to risk their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to establish a new Nation, unique among the countries of the world. President Abraham Lincoln understood that this belief is “the electric cord” that “links the hearts of patriotic and liberty-loving” people, no matter their race or country of origin. It is the belief that inspired the heroic black soldiers of the 54th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment to defend that same Union at great cost in the Civil War. And it is what inspired Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., to dream that his children would one day “not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

    Thanks to the courage and sacrifice of our forebears, America has made significant progress toward realization of our national creed, particularly in the 57 years since Dr. King shared his dream with the country.

    Today, however, many people are pushing a different vision of America that is grounded in hierarchies based on collective social and political identities rather than in the inherent and equal dignity of every person as an individual. This ideology is rooted in the pernicious and false belief that America is an irredeemably racist and sexist country; that some people, simply on account of their race or sex, are oppressors; and that racial and sexual identities are more important than our common status as human beings and Americans.

    This destructive ideology is grounded in misrepresentations of our country’s history and its role in the world. Although presented as new and revolutionary, they resurrect the discredited notions of the nineteenth century’s apologists for slavery who, like President Lincoln’s rival Stephen A. Douglas, maintained that our government “was made on the white basis” “by white men, for the benefit of white men.” Our Founding documents rejected these racialized views of America, which were soundly defeated on the blood-stained battlefields of the Civil War. Yet they are now being repackaged and sold as cutting-edge insights. They are designed to divide us and to prevent us from uniting as one people in pursuit of one common destiny for our great country.

    Unfortunately, this malign ideology is now migrating from the fringes of American society and threatens to infect core institutions of our country. Instructors and materials teaching that men and members of certain races, as well as our most venerable institutions, are inherently sexist and racist are appearing in workplace diversity trainings across the country, even in components of the Federal Government and among Federal contractors. For example, the Department of the Treasury recently held a seminar that promoted arguments that “virtually all White people, regardless of how ‘woke’ they are, contribute to racism,” and that instructed small group leaders to encourage employees to avoid “narratives” that Americans should “be more color-blind” or “let people’s skills and personalities be what differentiates them.”

    Training materials from Argonne National Laboratories, a Federal entity, stated that racism “is interwoven into every fabric of America” and described statements like “color blindness” and the “meritocracy” as “actions of bias.”

    Materials from Sandia National Laboratories, also a Federal entity, for non-minority males stated that an emphasis on “rationality over emotionality” was a characteristic of “white male[s],” and asked those present to “acknowledge” their “privilege” to each other.

    A Smithsonian Institution museum graphic recently claimed that concepts like “[o]bjective, rational linear thinking,” “[h]ard work” being “the key to success,” the “nuclear family,” and belief in a single god are not values that unite Americans of all races but are instead “aspects and assumptions of whiteness.” The museum also stated that “[f]acing your whiteness is hard and can result in feelings of guilt, sadness, confusion, defensiveness, or fear.”

    All of this is contrary to the fundamental premises underpinning our Republic: that all individuals are created equal and should be allowed an equal opportunity under the law to pursue happiness and prosper based on individual merit.

    Executive departments and agencies (agencies), our Uniformed Services, Federal contractors, and Federal grant recipients should, of course, continue to foster environments devoid of hostility grounded in race, sex, and other federally protected characteristics. Training employees to create an inclusive workplace is appropriate and beneficial. The Federal Government is, and must always be, committed to the fair and equal treatment of all individuals before the law.

    But training like that discussed above perpetuates racial stereotypes and division and can use subtle coercive pressure to ensure conformity of viewpoint. Such ideas may be fashionable in the academy, but they have no place in programs and activities supported by Federal taxpayer dollars. Research also suggests that blame-focused diversity training reinforces biases and decreases opportunities for minorities.

    Our Federal civil service system is based on merit principles. These principles, codified at 5 U.S.C. 2301, call for all employees to “receive fair and equitable treatment in all aspects of personnel management without regard to” race or sex “and with proper regard for their . . . constitutional rights.” Instructing Federal employees that treating individuals on the basis of individual merit is racist or sexist directly undermines our Merit System Principles and impairs the efficiency of the Federal service. Similarly, our Uniformed Services should not teach our heroic men and women in uniform the lie that the country for which they are willing to die is fundamentally racist. Such teachings could directly threaten the cohesion and effectiveness of our Uniformed Services.

    Such activities also promote division and inefficiency when carried out by Federal contractors. The Federal Government has long prohibited Federal contractors from engaging in race or sex discrimination and required contractors to take affirmative action to ensure that such discrimination does not occur. The participation of contractors’ employees in training that promotes race or sex stereotyping or scapegoating similarly undermines efficiency in Federal contracting. Such requirements promote divisiveness in the workplace and distract from the pursuit of excellence and collaborative achievements in public administration.

    Therefore, it shall be the policy of the United States not to promote race or sex stereotyping or scapegoating in the Federal workforce or in the Uniformed Services, and not to allow grant funds to be used for these purposes. In addition, Federal contractors will not be permitted to inculcate such views in their employees.

    Sec. 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this order, the phrase:

    (a) “Divisive concepts” means the concepts that (1) one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex; (2) the United States is fundamentally racist or sexist; (3) an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously; (4) an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of his or her race or sex; (5) members of one race or sex cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect to race or sex; (6) an individual’s moral character is necessarily determined by his or her race or sex; (7) an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex; (8) any individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race or sex; or (9) meritocracy or traits such as a hard work ethic are racist or sexist, or were created by a particular race to oppress another race. The term “divisive concepts” also includes any other form of race or sex stereotyping or any other form of race or sex scapegoating.

    (b) “Race or sex stereotyping” means ascribing character traits, values, moral and ethical codes, privileges, status, or beliefs to a race or sex, or to an individual because of his or her race or sex.

    (c) “Race or sex scapegoating” means assigning fault, blame, or bias to a race or sex, or to members of a race or sex because of their race or sex. It similarly encompasses any claim that, consciously or unconsciously, and by virtue of his or her race or sex, members of any race are inherently racist or are inherently inclined to oppress others, or that members of a sex are inherently sexist or inclined to oppress others.

    (d) “Senior political appointee” means an individual appointed by the President, or a non-career member of the Senior Executive Service (or agency-equivalent system).

    Sec. 3. Requirements for the United States Uniformed Services. The United States Uniformed Services, including the United States Armed Forces, shall not teach, instruct, or train any member of the United States Uniformed Services, whether serving on active duty, serving on reserve duty, attending a military service academy, or attending courses conducted by a military department pursuant to a Reserve Officer Corps Training program, to believe any of the divisive concepts set forth in section 2(a) of this order. No member of the United States Uniformed Services shall face any penalty or discrimination on account of his or her refusal to support, believe, endorse, embrace, confess, act upon, or otherwise assent to these concepts.

    Sec. 4. Requirements for Government Contractors. (a) Except in contracts exempted in the manner provided by section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 (Equal Employment Opportunity), as amended, all Government contracting agencies shall include in every Government contract hereafter entered into the following provisions:

    “During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows:

    1. The contractor shall not use any workplace training that inculcates in its employees any form of race or sex stereotyping or any form of race or sex scapegoating, including the concepts that (a) one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex; (b) an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously; (c) an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of his or her race or sex; (d) members of one race or sex cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect to race or sex; (e) an individual’s moral character is necessarily determined by his or her race or sex; (f) an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex; (g) any individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race or sex; or (h) meritocracy or traits such as a hard work ethic are racist or sexist, or were created by a particular race to oppress another race. The term “race or sex stereotyping” means ascribing character traits, values, moral and ethical codes, privileges, status, or beliefs to a race or sex, or to an individual because of his or her race or sex, and the term “race or sex scapegoating” means assigning fault, blame, or bias to a race or sex, or to members of a race or sex because of their race or sex.

    2. The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice, to be provided by the agency contracting officer, advising the labor union or workers’ representative of the contractor’s commitments under the Executive Order of September 22, 2020, entitled Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.

    3. In the event of the contractor’s noncompliance with the requirements of paragraphs (1), (2), and (4), or with any rules, regulations, or orders that may be promulgated in accordance with the Executive Order of September 22, 2020, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided by any rules, regulations, or orders the Secretary of Labor has issued or adopted pursuant to Executive Order 11246, including subpart D of that order.

    4. The contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (4) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as may be directed by the Secretary of Labor as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, that in the event the contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.”

    (b) The Department of Labor is directed, through the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), to establish a hotline and investigate complaints received under both this order as well as Executive Order 11246 alleging that a Federal contractor is utilizing such training programs in violation of the contractor’s obligations under those orders. The Department shall take appropriate enforcement action and provide remedial relief, as appropriate.

    (c) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Director of OFCCP shall publish in the Federal Register a request for information seeking information from Federal contractors, Federal subcontractors, and employees of Federal contractors and subcontractors regarding the training, workshops, or similar programming provided to employees. The request for information should request copies of any training, workshop, or similar programing having to do with diversity and inclusion as well as information about the duration, frequency, and expense of such activities.

    Sec. 5. Requirements for Federal Grants. The heads of all agencies shall review their respective grant programs and identify programs for which the agency may, as a condition of receiving such a grant, require the recipient to certify that it will not use Federal funds to promote the concepts that (a) one race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex; (b) an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously; (c) an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of his or her race or sex; (d) members of one race or sex cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect to race or sex; (e) an individual’s moral character is necessarily determined by his or her race or sex; (f) an individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex; (g) any individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race or sex; or (h) meritocracy or traits such as a hard work ethic are racist or sexist, or were created by a particular race to oppress another race. Within 60 days of the date of this order, the heads of agencies shall each submit a report to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that lists all grant programs so identified.

    Sec. 6. Requirements for Agencies. (a) The fair and equal treatment of individuals is an inviolable principle that must be maintained in the Federal workplace. Agencies should continue all training that will foster a workplace that is respectful of all employees. Accordingly:

    (i) The head of each agency shall use his or her authority under 5 U.S.C. 301, 302, and 4103 to ensure that the agency, agency employees while on duty status, and any contractors hired by the agency to provide training, workshops, forums, or similar programming (for purposes of this section, “training”) to agency employees do not teach, advocate, act upon, or promote in any training to agency employees any of the divisive concepts listed in section 2(a) of this order. Agencies may consult with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4116, in carrying out this provision; and
    (ii) Agency diversity and inclusion efforts shall, first and foremost, encourage agency employees not to judge each other by their color, race, ethnicity, sex, or any other characteristic protected by Federal law.

    (b) The Director of OPM shall propose regulations providing that agency officials with supervisory authority over a supervisor or an employee with responsibility for promoting diversity and inclusion, if such supervisor or employee either authorizes or approves training that promotes the divisive concepts set forth in section 2(a) of this order, shall take appropriate steps to pursue a performance-based adverse action proceeding against such supervisor or employee under chapter 43 or 75 of title 5, United States Code.

    (c) Each agency head shall:

    (i) issue an order incorporating the requirements of this order into agency operations, including by making compliance with this order a provision in all agency contracts for diversity training;

    (ii) request that the agency inspector general thoroughly review and assess by the end of the calendar year, and not less than annually thereafter, agency compliance with the requirements of this order in the form of a report submitted to OMB; and

    (iii) assign at least one senior political appointee responsibility for ensuring compliance with the requirements of this order.

    Sec. 7. OMB and OPM Review of Agency Training. (a) Consistent with OPM’s authority under 5 U.S.C. 4115-4118, all training programs for agency employees relating to diversity or inclusion shall, before being used, be reviewed by OPM for compliance with the requirements of section 6 of this order.

    (b) If a contractor provides a training for agency employees relating to diversity or inclusion that teaches, advocates, or promotes the divisive concepts set forth in section 2(a) of this order, and such action is in violation of the applicable contract, the agency that contracted for such training shall evaluate whether to pursue debarment of that contractor, consistent with applicable law and regulations, and in consultation with the Interagency Suspension and Debarment Committee.

    (c) Within 90 days of the date of this order, each agency shall report to OMB all spending in Fiscal Year 2020 on Federal employee training programs relating to diversity or inclusion, whether conducted internally or by contractors. Such report shall, in addition to providing aggregate totals, delineate awards to each individual contractor.

    (d) The Directors of OMB and OPM may jointly issue guidance and directives pertaining to agency obligations under, and ensuring compliance with, this order.

    Sec. 8. Title VII Guidance. The Attorney General should continue to assess the extent to which workplace training that teaches the divisive concepts set forth in section 2(a) of this order may contribute to a hostile work environment and give rise to potential liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. If appropriate, the Attorney General and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission shall issue publicly available guidance to assist employers in better promoting diversity and inclusive workplaces consistent with Title VII.

    Sec. 9. Effective Date. This order is effective immediately, except that the requirements of section 4 of this order shall apply to contracts entered into 60 days after the date of this order.

    Sec. 10. General Provisions. (a) This order does not prevent agencies, the United States Uniformed Services, or contractors from promoting racial, cultural, or ethnic diversity or inclusiveness, provided such efforts are consistent with the requirements of this order.

    (b) Nothing in this order shall be construed to prohibit discussing, as part of a larger course of academic instruction, the divisive concepts listed in section 2(a) of this order in an objective manner and without endorsement.

    (c) If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

    (d) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

    (i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or

    (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (e) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (f) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    DONALD J. TRUMP

    THE WHITE HOUSE,
    September 22, 2020.

    ~~~~~~~~~

    http://wetheonepeople.com/executive-order-on-combating-race-and-sex-stereotyping/ = this posting

    Share