Robert Mueller is a monster of the highest order. The fact that this heinous figure could get himself appointed to conduct a witch hunt against the President is nothing short of shocking.
This is both a partial and an inadequately brief but stunning set of revelations regarding Mueller’s lengthy list of criminal behaviors.
For the purposes of brevity and due to the fact that there will more than likely be a part two, only Mueller’s involvement with the Boston mafia and his role in directly providing Russians in the Uranium One scandal will be covered in this article. It should be mentioned that Mueller’s criminality goes much further than this article’s coverage.
The FBI, Boston Mafia Murders and Mueller
What role did Robert Mueller play in the illegal and conflict of interest and very cozy relationship between the FBI and the Boston Mafia figures that resulted in multiple murders, blackmail, RICO violations, witness tampering, and many more crimes involving FBI complicity under the direction or Robert Mueller?
Special Counsel Robert Mueller, appointed to remove Trump from office was presented by the mainstream media (MSM) as this pristine man of impeccable integrity when nothing could have been further from the truth. Both Mueller and former and disgraced FBI Director James Comey had their images crafted by the MSM in the same manner. However, it has now been demonstrated that Comey leaked classified information that he thought would be damaging to Trump. He committed perjury to Congress. Comey should be in prison not making book deals. And one can be certain that a book deal awaits Mueller as well should he be able to remove Trump. Both men are lying, extreme left-wing freaks who should be in prison.
Of the two men, Robert Mueller’s is much more criminal than Comey’s.
Comey should not necessarily be charged with murder, Mueller should. Investigative journalist Sarah Carter’s blog, Questions Still Surround Robert Mueller’s Boston Past, published on March 20th, raises serious legal concerns regarding Mueller’s past. This is in reference to what is often referred to as The Whitey Bulger FBI Mob Case.
The New American detailed recounted the 1998 Whitey Bulger case entitled as FBI Covering for Criminals, which was about the murderous boss of Boston’s notorious Winter Hill Gang, Whitney Bulger as his gang of Irish Mafia carried out a reign of murderous terror under the protection of the FBI who was under the direction of then US Attorney to Boston Robert Mueller and the cover up continued after Mueller’s appointment as FBI Director.
Time after time, Massachusetts state and local police had their elaborate, years-long investigations of Bulger foiled by FBI interference and at the center of it all was Robert Mueller.
FBI Special Agent John Connolly and John Morris, who was in charge of the FBI’s Boston Organized Crime Squad, were Bulger’s protectors and would tip him off to investigations and wiretaps by other police agencies. The corruption was so well known FBI that Martin Scorcese made a 2006 film about the case called The Departed. The movie contained a star studded cast of Jack Nicholson, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Matt Damon.
America, ask yourself a question, who was President in 1994? Who was his wife? This figures prominently in the latter part of this article.
What was Mueller’s role in all of this?
Eventually, FBI handler, John Connolly tipped off Bulger that he was about to be arrested. He escaped justice for 16 years. When he was finally caught, in 2011, he was convicted of 32 counts of RICO, including 19 murders. This is who Robert Mueller’s FBI was protecting.
While Bulger was on the run, his FBI partners in crime, Con and Morris, were arrested and indicted. In 2008 Connolly was convicted for his role in the murders of FBI informant John B. Callahan and Oklahoma businessman Roger Wheeler. Connolly’s boss, John Morris, who reported directly to Mueller, was allowed to escape jail by testifying against his former colleague in crime.. Clearly, as part of this sweat heart plea deal, Morris’ testimony never touched Mueller.
According to Boston Globe columnist Kevin Cullen who wrote an article entitled, A lingering question for the FBI Director. In his title, Cullen was referring to was then-Director Robert Mueller, who had previously been one of the DOJ attorneys assigned to investigate the criminal operation of Bulger and the FBI’s handling of the matter. Cullen was outraged at Mueller’s conduct in covering up for Bulger, and so much so that Cullen opposed Mueller’s reappointment as FBI Director. Part of Mueller’s cover up was related to the Albano case in which the DOJ and the FBI framed four men for a 1965 gangland murder. Mueller engaged in cover up after cover up because the Bulger Irish Mafia was making certain FBI officials, including Mueller, who would enhance his reputation by giving up Bulger’s mafia opposition for prosecution and FBI frame-ups were part of the practice of the day. Eventually, 36 years later, the four men would be exonerated. Two of the men died in captivity. It is hard to believe that Mueller was not prosecuted for his role in these matters.
Famed Attorney, Alan Dershowitz, confirms this account in an interview he gave to Newsmax in which he ripped the integrity of Mueller as Special Prosecutor.
He’s the guy who kept four innocent people in prison for many years in order to protect the cover of Whitey Bulger as an FBI informer. Those of us in Boston don’t have such a high regard for Mueller because we remember this story. The government had to pay out tens of millions of dollars because Whitey Bulger, a notorious mass murderer, became a government informer against the mafia . . .
And that’s regarded in Boston of one of the great scandals of modern judicial history. And Mueller was right at the center of it. So, he is not without criticism by people who know him in Boston.
Mueller went from the US Attorney on the Bulger case to the FBI Director where he continued the Boston Mafia cover up.
Mueller Sold Uranium to the Russians On Behalf of the Clinton Foundation While Serving As FBI Director
Perhaps if Robert Mueller, Special Counsel, wants to investigate Russian collusion, he should start with himself.
At one time, I had a problem with Mueller’s appointment as Special Counsel because of his former friendship with disgraced FBI Director, James Comey.
While looking in the rear view mirror of recent history, my concern is trivial compared to what is presently being revealed. The stakes have grown to enormous proportions and Mueller is being proven to be guilty of multiple felonies as well as treason which is an offense which could potentially be punishable by death.
Former FBI Director Robert Mueller was appointed as Special Counsel for the sole purpose of investigating possible Russian collusion charges between President Trump’s campaign and the Russian government. On the heels of the collusion, Mueller is also looking for the smoking gun for obstruction of justice, on the part of Trump, which is the same charge that ultimately brought down the presidency of Richard Nixon. However, sometimes life is ironic and in a stunning development, Wikileaks, Julian Assange, tweeted a released State Department cable, which clearly and irrefutably proves that then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered former FBI Director and present Special Counsel, Robert Mueller to deliver a sample of stolen Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to Russia in 2009.
As I have documented several times on The Common Sense Show, a front company, Uranium One, was created to handle the “dirty work” of the uranium transfer to the Russians. At the center of the shell corporation, as released Wikileaks records, demonstrates that an individual namedFrank Giustra was the organizing figure. Over time, Giustra contributed a total of $31 million to the Clinton Foundation in a clear case of pay for play bribery!
The Wikileaks released State Department communications show State Department officials had obtained, in the Fall of 2009, an internal Rosatom memo that warned about Putin’s intentions to acquire American originated uranium. Despite the evidence which should have forced Clinton to bring the FBI into the matter as an investigative body instead of being Clinton’s stooge in the uranium deal, presents clear evidence which was available to both Mueller and Clinton, a full year before the first CIFUS approval to move uranium to Putin, Clinton did not recuse the State Department from the deal in which two CIFUS votes clearly gave Putin control of 20% of all American-based uranium.
To Russian with Love: Hillary Sends Mueller to Russia with Uranium
The WikiLeaks tweet referenced a cable from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sent to John Beyrle, U.S. Ambassador, and the Georgia Embassy as well as the memo being being sent to the Russian Embassy, dated Aug. 17, 2009, indicating FBI Director Robert Mueller was planning to fly to Moscow on September 21st of 2009, to deliver a sample of highly enriched uranium (HEU) and that the identified uranium had been confiscated by the U.S. Department of Energy during a 2006 nuclear smuggling sting operation involving one Russian national and several Georgian accomplices.
In short, this action is the metaphorical equivalent of the police confiscating illegal drugs and then turning around and selling these drugs to illicit drug dealers.
One of the big problems in America today is that “public servants” like Hillary Clinton actually represent a foreign enemy masquerading as a domestic public servant.
I will go one step further than Donald Trump’s campaign assertion that Clinton is a criminal and state that Hillary Clinton is this generation’s Ethel Rosenberg and has committed heinous acts of treason against the people of the United States. and Robert Mueller is right there as he right hand man.
The New York Times further asserted that members of the Canadian mining industry, who have supported Clinton’s campaign, financed and sold off to the Russians a company that we now know as Uranium One. Uranium One is directly responsible for transferring uranium from BLM land to the Russians through an off-shore holding company. Again, according to the NY Times, the Russians, through three separate transactions, acquired Uranium One, while paying off the Clintons and their Canadian partners from 2009-2013. The business deal also involved paying Bill Clinton $500,000 dollars for a speech on energy which was delivered in Moscow. The Clinton’s turned this money into Presidential campaign money. How many felonies did I just describe?
The entire State Department memo is listed, below under “documents”.
Here is a brief summation of what has been presented here.
SMOKING GUN DOCUMENTATION
State Department Memos
2009 AMBASSADOR BEYRLE E-MAIL D. 08 MOSCOW 521 Classified By: EUR/PRA: KATHLEEN MORENSKI PER E.O. 12958: REASONS 1.4 (A) AND (G). 1.
(SBU) This is an action request: Embassy Moscow please see para 6 and 7; and Embassy Tbilisi please see para 8. 2. (S/NF) Background: Over two years ago Russia requested a ten-gram sample of highly enriched uranium (HEU) seized in early 2006 in Georgia during a nuclear smuggling sting operation involving one Russian national and several Georgian accomplices. The seized HEU was transferred to U.S. custody and is being held at a secure DOE facility.
In response to the Russian request, the Georgian Government authorized the United States to share a sample of the material with the Russians for forensic analysis. Director Mueller previously planned to deliver the sample in April (Ref A), but due to a scheduling conflict the trip was canceled. Embassy Moscow LegAtt informed the FSB prior to Mueller’s intended April delivery and received confirmation that the FSB would take custody of the sample after the Director’s plane landed. EST Moscow also informed Rosatom of the planned transfer and that the U.S. placed a high priority on completing this transfer (Ref B). Once the LegAtt told FSB counterparts the April trip had been canceled, Ambassador Beyrle informed Igor Neverov (Ref C), who said that he understood but was disappointed the trip was postponed. The September 21 visit provides again an opportunity to deliver the requested ten-gram sample from the seized HEU in order to obtain cooperation from the GOR on this nuclear smuggling case and to eventually establish a more productive mechanism of U.S.-Russian cooperation on nuclear forensics. 3. (S/NF) While there was a reasonable exchange of information with Russian security services at the time of the 2006 seizure, we have had poor cooperation investigating the diversion of HEU, which the United States believes was stolen from a Russian facility. Russia did not respond to papers that then Acting U/S Rood provided Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov in December 2008 reiterating the USG position that Russia should pick up this sample in the United States. Further, when asked for an update on their response to our proposal, Ryabkov told us in early 2009 in Washington that there was an interagency dispute over who would come and pick up the material. 4. (S/NF) Given Russia’s reluctance to act so far, FBI Mueller’s delivery of this sample will underscore to Russia our commitment to follow through on this case. While some details related to the sharing of information on smuggling networks may be too sensitive to discuss, delivery of the sample could enable us to discuss whether Russian authorities investigated the diversion and prosecuted anyone. Moreover, we hope it will spark discussions on mechanisms to exchange information and material on future incidents of this nature, particularly in light of the commitments made in the July summit U.S.-Russia Joint Statement on Nuclear Cooperation regarding strengthening our cooperation to stop acts of nuclear terrorism. Posts should note that DOE/NNSA’s April 2009 determination authorizing distribution of the sample to the Russian Federation only for attribution of the sample in support of a criminal investigation is applicable to the proposed September 21 delivery of the sample to Russia. 5. (S/Rel Russia) Background con’t: On April 16, the FSB verbally confirmed to Legatt that we will have no problem with the Russian Ministry of Aviation concerning Mueller’s flight (although we probably won’t see paperwork until shortly before the trip). The FBI is requiring that the sample be turned over to a Russian law enforcement authority (i.e., FSB) as opposed to an intelligence service (i.e., SVR) or technical authority (i.e., Rosatom). A representative from the responsible Russian Law Enforcement authority, who will accept custody of the sample, must be identified and verified ahead of time. That individual will be required to have signatory authority to accept the sample. Appropriate arrangements need to be made to ensure the transfer of material is conducted at the airport, plane-side, upon arrival of the Director’s aircraft. Post should also remind the GOR that this is the material about which the GOR gave the USG nonproliferation assurances in 2008 in a diplomatic note from February 2008 (Ref D). 6. (S/Rel Russia) Action request: Embassy Moscow is requested to alert at the highest appropriate level the Russian Federation that FBI Director Mueller plans to deliver the HEU sample once he arrives to Moscow on September 21. Post is requested to convey information in paragraph 5 with regard to chain of custody, and to request details on Russian Federation’s plan for picking up the material. Embassy is also requested to reconfirm the April 16 understanding from the FSB verbally that we will have no problem with the Russian Ministry of Aviation concerning Mueller’s September 21 flight clearance. 7. (S/Rel Russia) Post is requested to deliver the following talking points: –We wish to inform you that FBI Director Mueller plans to arrive in Moscow on the evening of September 21 with a ten-gram sample of seized HEU, which you requested for nuclear forensics analysis. –We regret that the April visit by Director Mueller could not take place due to a scheduling conflict. We would be grateful once again for the Russian Federation’s willingness to receive the sample and facilitate the logistics for its pick up. –As before, we require confirmation that a representative from a responsible Russian law enforcement authority will be available to accept custody of the sample and have signatory authority to accept the sample. –We require that the transfer of this material be conducted at the airport, on the tarmac near by the plane, upon arrival of the Director’s aircraft. –We place a high priority on completion of this sample transfer to facilitate your forensic analysis of the material. –Further, with the delivery of this sample, we hope to collaborate more closely on promoting a more effective relationship between our law enforcement organizations to counter illicit trafficking of nuclear materials. –In particular, such efforts were underscored in the July Summit joint presidential statement on nuclear cooperation regarding our commitments to strengthen cooperation to stop acts of nuclear terrorism. Securing vulnerable nuclear materials and improving nuclear security within our two countries is our highest priority. — It is our hope to eventually establish a more systematic mechanism to facilitate U.S.-Russian cooperation on investigations into nuclear smuggling cases. We continue to believe that Russia should be concerned by the prospect that HEU was diverted from one of its facilities, and should actively investigate the incident. 8. (S/Rel Georgia) For Embassy Tbilisi: No action is required at this point. As before, State will send instructions at the appropriate time on alerting the Georgian Government when the transfer of the seized HEU is immanent and in Russian custody. 9. (U) Department thanks Post for its assistance. Washington point of contacts are Mike Curry, ISN/WMDT, 202-736-7692 (CurryMR@state.sgov.gov) and Nate Young, EUR/PRA, 202-647-7278 (YoungNH@state.sgov.gov). Please slug all responses for EUR, ISN/WMDT, and T. CLINTON
ALERTING GOR OF DELIVERY OF SEIZED HEU DURING SEPTEMBER 21 FBI DIRECTOR’S TRIP TO MOSCOW 2009 August 17, 19:56 (Monday) 09STATE85588_a SECRET SECRET
In the metadata of the Kissinger Cables this field is called ‘Previous Handling Restrictions’.Cablegate does not originally have this field. We have given it the entry ‘Not Assigned’.
Citations for acronyms used are available here.” ,=””>Handling Restrictions— Not Assigned —
7847 — Not Assigned — TEXT ONLINE — Not Assigned — TE – Telegram (cable) — N/A or Blank —— N/A or Blank — — Not Assigned — From: — Not Assigned —One can clearly see that the Secretary of State assigned top secret security status for the Mueller delivery of the uranium to the Russians. In 2009, the Secretary of State was Hillary Clinton. Russian payment was made to the Clinton Foundation. This means that Mueller, while FBI Director, was a direct employee of the Clinton Foundation.Conclusion
New evidence is surfacing that Mueller and Comey attempted to cover up 9/11. The criminal corruption of the Obama administration knew no bounds and right at the center of it was Robert Mueller. And this man was appointed to investigate the President for potential wrongdoing with Russia?
by Dave Hodges, published on The Common Sense Show
~ the people