May We Have Your Attention
A MUST READ — FROM ONE PISSED OFF JUDGE — I HOPE I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION
It has taken me all day to figure out how to simplify this complicated email that came in last evening for your easy understanding, because it is not in any way a simple issue.
The Judge who is ‘pissed off’ is Judge Anna von Reitz, and I would title her statement here from her own words. “I suggest gentleemen that we cut the crap.”
Dr. Richard Cordero went to Court to try through our present judicial system to expose a fraudulent judge, and this pending case was discussed, back and forth among interested parties for some weeks in emails now being called: Oral argument in a test case on holding a judge liable for disregarding the law and the facts and causing a pro se injury in fact I have followed the discussion, but not as closely as I might have liked — until I received the email below (edited for privacy – phone numbers, etc.) last night from Diane Hicks who is also in this chain of followers, and who I believe gave it the title . . . from one pissed off judge! Good for Diane!!!.
As most of you are aware, it is often necessary to read emails from bottom to top, and I am going to alter that, removing only the most important information so that you understand the final comment from ‘ONE PISSED OFF JUDGE’, who just happens to be Judge Anna von Reitz!
As I have tried to cut to the chase for you, I have decided not to present the first couple emails, but go directly to this one — and to eliminate many of the details; otherwise, I fear we, the average citizens, will be lost in them. I pray Dr. Cordero will forgive me, but I’ve learned to trust my judgment. Anyone wanting deeper, more formal analysis and information may easily contact him. ~J
Re: Oral argument in a test case on holding a judge liable for disregarding the law and the facts and causing a pro se injury in fact
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Dear Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Next Thursday, April 16, I will present oral arguments to the Appellate Division (an appeals court) of the Second Department of the New York State (NYS) Supreme Court in Brooklyn, NY City, in a case of interest to all Advocates of Honest Judiciaries. The legal references, arguments, and structure of this statement can be used as a template by other Advocates in any state trying to hold judges accountable and even liable to compensate the victims of their wrongdoing.
Table of Contents
- The issues under review affect the ever growing number of pro ses and involve the liability of judges for causing injury in fact to any party
- The facts show that the judge failed to ‘hear’ the party’s oral and written arguments; and disregarded or ignored the law and the facts
- The Appellate court should hold that the judge was tortiously irresponsible, discriminatory, and incompetent, and acted in breach of contract
- Relief through which the Appellate court can set judicial accountability reform in motion for New York and the rest of the country
- Your attendance in support of the principle that We the Peopleare the masters and can hold liable judicial public servants
So, now we have the basis of his case, presented above. The next article presents the idea of a documentary film to help make the AMERICAN PUBLIC aware of what is going on. . . ~J
Black Robed Predators: a proposal for a documentary on how unaccountable judges risklessly prey on your rights, property, and liberty
BLACK ROBED PREDATORS
A Proposal for a documentary ontwo unique cases of wrongdoing at the top of governmentthat expos how federal judges
have become unaccountable in connivance with the other two branches and consequently, engage risklessly in coordinated wrongdoing by disregarding their duty, due process, and the rule of law to prey on We the People’s rights, property, and liberty
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University of Cambridge, EnglandM.B.A., University of Michigan Business SchoolD.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris Judicial Discipline ReformNew York City
- Federal judges’ wrongdoing has been shown through the analysis of official statistics, reports, and statements [*>ii] in the study of the Federal Judiciary –whose procedural and evidentiary rules are followed by its state counterparts, for which it is the model– titled, Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing: Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting (*>jur:1) The analysis highlights their means, motive, and opportunity (jur:21§§1-3) for judges’ wrongdoing.
- This article proposes its presentation in a documentary. It will emphasize its most outrageous and corruptive enabling circumstance: coordination (88§§a-c) among judges and between them and other insiders of the legal and bankruptcy systems , politicians (77§§5-6), and government entities (ol:19§D).
- It will show that wrongdoing (jur:133§4) is not the deviant conduct of individual rogue judges, but rather collective conduct that is coordinated to ensure that doing wrong is safer, easier, and more beneficial. That encourages further wrongdoing.
- So does a judge who keeps quiet about his peer’s wrongdoing, becoming accessory after the fact concerning it and before the fact concerning all future wrongdoing encouraged by the expectation of his silence. Such implicit coordination corrupts the judge and his peers, putting them ‘in the same boat’ of mutually dependent survival due to complicity: The judge is their accomplice before and after the fact and the peers are wrongdoing principals.
- Coordination has allowed judges to develop the most harmful form of wrongdoing, i.e., schemes, such as a bankruptcy fraud scheme (jur:66§§2-3), a concealment of assets scheme [107ac, 213], and a docket clearing scheme (43§1). Coordination has made wrongdoing so widespread and routine that it is the Federal Judiciary’s institutionalized modus operandi (ol:190).
- The documentary’ financial viability: its market is huge
- Every year 50 million new cases are filed in the state and federal courts [4,5]. To them must be added scores of millions of pending cases. Given that every case involves at least two opposing parties, at least 100 million persons and entities go and are brought to court annually.
- In fact, many more do so because a party can be composed of more than one person or entity; it can even be composed of a class of hundreds of thousands of persons similarly situated.
- To the parties must be added all those persons and entities that are more or less directly affected by their litigation. These include friends, relatives, employees, buyers, suppliers, investors, creditors, debtors, shareholders, landlords, tenants, even the store on the corner, who may see its business diminished because a party and others affected by it can no longer afford to patronize its store, etc.
- Two unique national stories to expose judges’ coordinated wrongdoing and provoke action-stirring outrage in the public during the long electoral season
- All those persons and entities actually form the national public. The documentary can make that public aware of how it is affected by judges who abuse their power to make self-beneficial decisions that with disregard for due process of law dispose of litigants’ and non-litigants’ rights, property, liberty, and lives. Thus, it can provoke in the public action-stirring outrage (83§§2-3).
- That is what two unique national stories (ol:55) can provoke. They can also expose top Democrat and Republican politicians [17a; jur:22¶31) who in their own interest and to the people’s detriment have allowed judges’ wrongdoing (5§3) to fester. These are the President Obama-Justice Sotomayor story –she was his first nominee to the Supreme Court– and the Federal Judiciary-NSA story.
- A realistic plan of investigation (ol:66) based on numerous leads and reliable evidence [107a-c; jur:65§B) is available to pursue these stories through a Follow the money!Investigation (ol:1) and a Follow it wirelessly!Investigation (ol:19§D), respectively.
- Such focused objective and advanced starting station facilitate the documentary’s production and reduce its cost and production lag.
- A documentary that provides the dominant issue of the electoral season
- The documentary can be produced in time to, and even provide the dominant issue of, the electoral season comprising the mid-term, primary, and 2016 presidential election campaigns. It can do so to a greater extent than Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11, which earned over $200 million.
- A documentary with apolitical, general public appeal
- A documentary on judges’ wrongdoing will appeal to the national public regardless of any political affiliation or lack thereof, and independently of any or no intention to vote in any election.
- Insatiable public demand for information about judges’ wrongdoing
- Rather than exhaust its subject, the documentary will open the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting. It will cause the public to demand to be informed about:
- Judges’ motive, means, and opportunity to do wrong (21§§1-3);
- Explicit and implicit coordinated wrongdoing among judges and with others (88§§a-c); and
- The extent, nature, and gravity of judges’ past and ongoing unaccountability and wrongdoing, e.g., “demeanor, abuse of power, bias, conflict of interest, bribery, incompetence” (10,11).
- Meeting a low standard can cause high-level resignations & impeachments
- To be effective, the documentary only has to show that judges have violated the injunction in their own Code of Conduct “to avoid even the appearance of impropriety” [123a]. Their “appearance” of lack of respect for legal and ethical provisions in their own conduct will detract from the required trust in their having respected them enough to apply them fairly and impartially to other people’s conduct.
- This is reasonable and precedented: Supreme Court Justice Abe Fort as was forced to resign in 1969 after Lifemagazine made his hold on office untenable by showing that he had engaged in financial improprieties, though they did not even amount to misdemeanors (92§d).
- Thus, the documentary can cause a flood of motions to vacate judgments and hold new trials of cases argued to, or tried before, judges who appear to have committed improprieties. This flood and the chaos into which it will throw the Federal Judiciary –eventually having the same effect on the state judiciaries– will work as free advertisement for the documentary.
- Launch a Watergate-like generalized media investigation of judges
- The above developments will prompt ever more journalists and media outlets to jump on the investigative bandwagon of judges’ wrongdoing in coordination with other parties, lest their audience go elsewhere to satisfy their demand for news thereon.
- Thereby the documentary will launch the first-ever, Watergate-like (4¶¶10-14) generalized media investigation of the Federal Judiciary. Such ever-expanding investigation will provide a constant reminder of the documentary as its starting point and continuing point of reference.
- The journalists’ investigation can be guided by a query that already (id.) proved to be devastating and that can be adapted as follows; and by a related query that finds its foundation in current events:
1 The President Obama-Justice Sotomayor story and the Follow the money! Investigation
What did the President know About his first Supreme Court nominee, Then-Judge, Now-Justice Sotomayor, being involved in both concealing assets –which The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico (jur: 65fn107a) suspected her of doing, and which is done to commit the crimes (ol: 5fn10) of tax evasion (jur: 65fn107c) and money laundering– and abusing the Federal Judiciary’s and/or the NSA’s computer network –see story ii. infra–; but did the President cover it up and lie to the American public by vouching for her honesty because he wanted to ingratiate himself with those petitioning him to nominate another woman and the first Hispanic to replace Retiring Justice Souter and from whom he expected in exchange support for the passage of the Obamacare bill in Congress; and if so,
When did he know it?
The Federal Judiciary-NSA story and the Follow it wirelessly! Investigation To what extent do federal judges abuse their vast computer network and expertise –which handle hundreds of millions of case files (`)– either alone or with the quid pro quo assistance of the NSA –up to 100% of whose secret requests for secret surveillance orders are rubberstamped (ol: 5fn7) by the federal judges of the secret court established under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)– both to conceal assets –a crime (ol:5fn10), unlike surveillance– by electronically transferring them between declared and hidden financial accounts (ol:1), and to cover up the judges’ wrongdoing by interfering with the communications –also a crime (ol:5a.fn13)– of would-be exposures and prevent them from joining forces to expose them; and if so, since when? (ol:69§C)
(See the statistical analysis supporting probable cause to believe that there has been communications interference (ol:19§Dfn2.))
- The investigation guided by this query can generate distrust of top public officers and make improprieties –even criminal conduct [ol:7, 10]– appear that lead to their resignation or impeachment.
- Public demand for official investigations by the authorities
- The intensifying outrage will stir up the public to demand official investigations by Congress, DoJ-FBI, and an independent prosecutor. Their more intrusive powers to issue subpoena, search & seizure and contempt orders, indictments, to interrogate, place under oath, plea bargain, hold public hearings, etc., will allow them to make findings that will further outrage the public.
- From an outraged public that demands reform to a civic movement
- The stream of outrageous findings during the electoral season will stir up the public to demand that both incumbents commence and candidates pledge to undertake fundamental judicial reform (158§§6-7). This can turn judges’ wrongdoing into an issue that shapes or even dominates the campaigns because it concerns the practical meaning and safeguard of a tenet of our republic:
- We the People, the only source of political power in ‘government of, by, and for the people’ , are the masters who have hired public officers as servants, including judicial servants, to perform services in the People’s behalf.
- We are entitled to subject them to ‘reverse surveillance’ (ol:29) to obtain the information needed to dispel the secrecy (27§e) of their performance in order to hold them accountable and liable to the victims of their wrongdoing (160§8).
- A documentary intent on causing the Peopleto assert in practice this tenet can prompt the emergence of a civic movement (164§9) that demands a new We the People-government paradigm: the People’s Sunrise.
- By empowering the Peopleto reestablish themselves as the masters of government, the documentary will be endowed with unequaled moral force and inspire a sense of mission: To implement the principle that ‘in government, not of men, but by the rule of law’ [ol:6], Nobody is Above the Law, and ensure that judges and politicians are committed to delivering Equal Justice Under Law.
- An outraged public can force politicians to amend the Constitution
- The documentary can show how the three branches of government have connived to participate in, or tolerate, judges’ trampling underfoot the rule of law to squeeze out for expediency and their benefit the strictures of due process and dish out its residue: the lees of justice.
- Nothing can outrage the national public as a showing thereof. No force can more strongly push for such convention than an outraged national public. Hence, provoking such outrage can constitute the necessary means to convince the public of the need for a constitutional convention and the content of the amendments.
- The national public has the unique power to punish politicians who are insensitive to its mood and demands by withholding donations, volunteered work, and word of mouth support, and issuing the threat of defeat at the polls. The precedent for such popular conduct is the Tea Party, a civic movement that forces politicians to support it or risk having their careers terminated.
- However, before a constitutional convention is convened on the strength of the 34 states that have called for it [270>Ln:309], there must be exposed how those who claim the preeminent right to interpret the Constitution, federal judges, have become unaccountable in connivance with politicians and consequently, engage risklessly in self-beneficial coordinated wrongdoing by disregarding their duty, due process, and the rule of law to prey on We the People’s rights, property, and liberty.
- Such exposure will make it possible to determine the full extent of the constitutional amendments needed to ensure that judges perform (Lsch:10¶6) transparently and are held accountable, disciplinable, and liable to compensate their victims by We the People.(jur:158§§6-8)
- Joining forces to produce the documentary and become Champions of Justice
- Thus, I encourage you, the Reader, and all other advocates of honest judiciaries to join forces to produce this documentary. By exposing judges’ wrongdoing in coordination with politicians and others, it can play a key role in the coming electoral season, lead to government reform, and earn us any of many material and moral rewards (ol:3§F), such as becoming recognized by a grateful Peopleas their Champions of Justice.
You may share and post this article widely. Meantime, I look forward to hearing from you.
At this point, Dr. Cordero ends his presentation, but adds the following very important information:
Watch the interview with Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., by Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, on the issue of exposing judges’ wrongdoing and bringing about judicial reform, at:
Please note the mention of U.S. Justice Sonia Sotomayor just above.
* * * * * * *
Now with the following email, it begins to get interesting! This is written by someone who obviously knows the Constitution does not work for us, the AMERICAN PEOPLE and why. He is a member of the sovereign movement. ~J
Thanks for asking what I would be able to contribute to your documentary on Re: Black Robed Predators: a proposal for a documentary on how unaccountable judges risklessly prey on your rights, property, and liberty.
I would offer to you all the evidence I personally investigated and uncovered personally in my Spousal Discrimination complaint DORA filed on my behalf in Nov 2004.
Jan 2006, DORA illegally dismissed my SPOUSAL DISCRIMINATION charge by accepting unsigned evidence in default by the Isle of Capri’s Attorney Mark Barnes. DORA never did not holding my appeal hearing they already accepted; this denying me due process.
DORA forced me into a District Court to begin with. Not only did the judge also deny due process in the courts, he was committing fraud on the court and has done so for over 10 years as he was never a DISTRICT court judge at any time in the State of CO certified by SOS Feb 20, 2013. A FREDERICK BARKER RODGERS had his COUNTY oath sworn to in Jan 2007, forged on the back side 3.5 years later certified by the SOS on July 8, 2010 that RODGERS is a District Court Judge.
May 7, 2012 I uncovered a “SMOKING GUN” of COUNTY COURT FREDERICK BARKER RODGERS’S COUNTY OATH OF OFFICE, WHICH WAS MAILED TO BE BY DEBORAH GEORGE, CLERK OF GILPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ON SEPT 10, 2010 the following day after I had submitted Rodgers County Oath certified by the SOS and demanded Rodgers to recuse himself from 2006 CV32 which he sat on the bench with no judicial authority.
When I uncovered this FRAUD I reported this fraud to every state agency out there including every NEWS INVESTIGATOR who advertise; Every News Investigator and Law Agency in Denver are aware of this judicial and SOS fraud committed against my wife and I; yet they all refuse to interview my wife and I and report it; likely b/c it is too big of a story and they were ordered to stand down, or if they did report this Judicial Fraud it would likely ruin their careers, or their scared. That would be my guess. Yet they advertise on TV everyday, “ARE YOU A WHISTLE BLOWER, WE WANT TO KNOW”…….they want to know JACK or NADDA b/c they all know the fraud I have uncovered with documented evidence provided to them all.
Keep in mind my civil 2006 CV32 in Gilpin County DISTRICT Court was held by an Imposter with no judicial authority at all who denied due process and committed fraud on the court.
APRIL 6, 2014 – I CALLED TREASON ON A MUNICIPAL JUDGE IN LAKEWOOD COLORADO AND WITNESSED BY 3 OTHERS.
On a second issue I was in Court when I was alleged to have committed a criminal traffic offense. This was a Motion to Dismiss hearing submitted by the Prosecuting Attorney in Lakewood, CO
This was the same day my Jury Trial I paid for was to commence. The Prosecuting Attorney wanting to dismiss this charge I was cited for on November 19, 2014. A rouge Cop cited me when I was the one who was sideswiped by an out of state driver. Cop accused me of causing this accident saying b/c I would have had to get in the left lane to get to work when I had just left work heading to a Dr’s appointment. I told Cop “don’t you dare put words in my mouth b/c that is just not going to happen. An hour later Cop serves me this CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, a misdemeanor. At arraignment the Judge told me I am facing a year in jail, fines, etc, wanting me to plead down to steal money from me. I paid for a Jury Trial which was never held over my objection.
I called TREASON on the judge as again I was denied due process when I would not plead down. I paid for a Jury Trial, was denied by the Judge. I told her she is in violation of her oath of office, in violation of the U.S. Constitution she took and oath to support and then I yelled out in the Court YOU ARE COMMITTING TREASON ON RECORD. TREASON was witnessed by 3 others and is on file. I have the evidence on this also.
If you would let me know what you would like me to supply, it is yours.
Call me when you have time.
David Lynn CoffeltHigh Crimes by Federal & State Gov’t Officials – Fraud on the Court www.spousaldiscriminationcoverup.com
All rights preserved – U.C.C. – 1-308 formally 1-207
Fraud, Forgery, Cover-up & Corruption under COLOR OF LAW by ACTORS of Judicial & Executive State Officials with SOS forging Judge’s County Oath of Office as a District Court Judge All reported to & ignored by Judicial Commission, AG, DA and Denver FBI, DOJ, OIG, FBI – DC
FOR NEWS INTERVIEWS OR INVESTIGATIONS FEEL FREE TO CONTACT Mr. Coffelt directly. [I have edited out personal information here. ~J]
AT LAST WE COME TO THE OPERATIVE EMAIL THAT TRIGGERED JUDGE ANNA VON REITZ’ TOUGH, TOUGH RESPONSE. HERE IT IS FROM SOMEONE NAMED MARK R. FERRAN:
I write to inform you that “Dave Comcast” ( David Lynn Coffelt) (“All rights preserved – U.C.C. – 1-308 formally 1-207″) is a member of a Cult known as “UCC/Redemption” and/or “sovereign citizens“. The members of this/these cults have effectively abandoned and WAIVED and relinquished all civil rights they would have under the Constitution and Laws of the United States, or the several states. They are generally considered to be “paper terrorists”, because of their typical misuse of UCC-style papers in every forum, including Traffic Court. They bring discredit to any organization or legitimate enterprise they become associated with. And, they have zero credibility. They lack a competent understanding the Law, as evidenced by their misplaced esteem for the UCC as the cure for all problems. Thus, it would be best if you declined any recognition or participation by persons like David C who advertises his membership in the Cult known as “UCC/Redemption” and/or “sovereign citizens”.
AND FINALLY, NOW, YOU HAVE THE BACKGROUND SO THAT YOU MAY READ WITH UNDERSTANDING JUDGE ANNA VON REITZ’ NO-HOLDS-BARRED RESPONSE. IF YOU DO NOT YET UNDERSTAND WHAT JUDGE VON REITZ IS SAYING, YOU NEED TO! IT IS AS IMPORTANT AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME AS IS THE FACT THAT 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.
I refer you here to recent articles of hers that I posted here on my blog:
IF I WERE ASKED TO GIVE JUDGE ANNA’S STATEMENT A TITLE, I THINK I WOULD CALL IT, USINGS ANNA’S WORDS:
“I SUGGEST GENTLEMEN THAT WE CUT THE CRAP.”
There is a dangerous misunderstanding of the term “sovereign citizen” and I am surprised at Mr. Ferran’s ignorant misuse of it. “Sovereign Citizen” however styled is an oxymoron, as one cannot be both a “sovereign” of any kind and at the same time a “citizen”. His own ignorance of the Law— the actual Law as opposed to the private “law” he evidently practices—is showing. Dave Comcast is not and has never been a “Sovereign Citizen”—- he is a peaceful inhabitant of the Continental United States claiming his birthright and objecting to the abuse of Protected Persons by the Federal United States and the numerous “governmental services corporations” being operated by international banking cartels as if they were our lawful government.
The essence of the fraud and criminality can be reduced down to press-ganging, personage, barratry, and inland piracy being practiced by the corporate officers and employees of foreign governments acting in violation of their charters and the treaties allowing their operations on the land of the Continental United States. These are for the most part capital crimes committed by Members of the Bar Associations, the British Government, the Government of the Westminster City State, the Lord Mayor of London, the Lords of the Admiralty, ELIZABETH II, the “United States Congress” and “UNITED STATES CONGRESS” and others who are in flagrant Breach of Trust, Commercial Contract, and International Treaties establishing and separating the land and sea jurisdictions owed to the United Colonies of America.
I suggest gentlemen that we cut the crap.
The fraud in its entirety is knowN. The criminality and the perpetrators —- are all known. There is no escape. There is no redemption except a thorough repentance, confession of error, and immediate action to correct. Dr. Cordero is exactly right and Mark R. Ferran is either a dupe or a perpetrator seeking to villify the victims of crimes so as to avoid his own culpability for their mischaracterization and the identity theft and personage being routinely practiced against the peaceful inhabitants of the Continental United States.
Both inland piracy and press-ganging have been outlawed for 200 years. Both carry a range of penalties up to and including capital punishment. Likewise, violation of the Geneva Convention Protocols of 1949, Volume II, Article 3 — the mischaracterization of identity or nationality of civilians — is a death penalty offense.
This is very quickly coming to a head, gentlemen, and it is not the victims of these crimes that we need to fear. It’s ignorance and self-service of the kind being displayed here by Mr. Ferran. Those who are called to labor in the cause of justice must prepare themselves for a number of rude shocks, not the least of which is that many honorable men such as Dr. Cordero, have been unaware of the nature of the Bar Associations and the agenda that these organizations have pursued in America and thence throughout the world since 1845.
They are supposedly Juris Doctors who imagine that they understand the Law, but who practice law. They can plainly read the prohibitions of the Constitutions of the United States and the united States of America against Titles of Nobility, and yet they dully imagine that they can operate as public officials and impose their private corporate “law” against the inhabitants of the Continental United States while accepting the title of “Esquire”. They also fail to question the meaning of the word “license” as in “license to practice law” — which clearly indicates that they are involved in activities that would be criminal but for permission granted by someone, somewhere.
The “someone” was the British Monarch acting in Breach of Trust in 1845 and secretively issuing Letters of Marque and Reprisal to the Bar Associations. Finally, they fail to notice that the “State Statutes” and the Uniform Commercial Code are both held under private copyright. What “Public Documents” do you know of that carry a private copyright? None. They are all Public Domain without exception.
Therefore, Mr. Ferran, what you (most likely) and other members of the Bar in this country have been practicing “at” not “in” is private law in Civil Maritime misapplied to innocent Americans who have trustingly and mistakenly held the members of the “legal profession” in high regard. The other form of law met in the COURTS is “executive admiralty” — a form of “martial common law” that is not authorized by anyone but a long-dead corporate Board of Directors.
I am attaching a list of the Dunn and Bradstreet Numbers of the “United States of America” and the “State of States” operated as franchises and a great many so-called “States” and “STATES” and government agencies which are all privately owned and operated legal fictions. *[I have omitted this .pdf document. ~J] This is just one tranch — one “level” of the fraud being committed internationally against innocent American civilians so as to defraud them of their property. The old Federal Reserve System has died a well-deserved death, but the UNITED STATES, INC., run by the IMF and chartered in France has just as many corporate franchises or more, and the new kid on the block, the newly created FEDERAL RESERVE being operated by the UNITED NATIONS Corporation under United Nations City-State auspices, has launched THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. — all to the same purpose — to steal the identities of the individual living people and the Continental United States and to use various forms of personage and credit fraud to enslave them, press-gang them into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea, and deprive them of their rights and property.
This is being done to Americans, Canadians, Australians, English, Scots, Welsh, Irish, German, Japanese, Greek, Italian, French, Danish and most of the people of the Western World by those who have pretended to be Allies and Friends and Trustees under the most solemn kinds of National Trust Indentures, Constitutions (commercial contracts for services) and international treaties and by international banking cartels secretively operating governmental services corporations (as shown above) under conditions of gross deceit and fraud as if these corporations were the lawful government of nations, instead of contractors providing services for pay.
Those awful “sovereign citizens” are acting under duress and using the Uniform Commercial Code to post Financing Statement Claims in the international record— in a jurisdiction they should never have to address if the Federal United States and their Agents were doing their actual jobs.
Innocent American civilians are being forced to post such claims and create such Security Agreements as a result of Bar Association predation, criminality, incompetence, and combined personage and barratry committed routinely against their persons and estates. As it stands the Bar Associations are acting as criminal syndicates on the shores of the Continental United States, are in gross violation of the Treaty allowing them to operate on the land, and in gross violation of their Charter.
This situation isn’t going to go away by pretending that American civilians are “Paper Terrorists”. It is appallingly apparent who the real “Paper Terrorists” are — and it is not Mom and Pop from Podunk, Mississippi. Every Bar Association Member in America may be trembling in their shoes and wondering what they are going to do when this proverbial shit fully hits the fan, but those who “blame the victims” are only making it worse for themselves and their brethren. The truth of the matter is already fully known, fully documented, fully recorded by courts of record including the Vatican Chancery, the British High Court, the World Court, and others since 2009. What Dr. Cordero has documented and what he has bravely opposed is what every Bar Member needs to oppose, if they are to save their profession and their own individual skins.
I suggest that you all examine the Laws of Admiralty and the penalties that can and eventually will be imposed upon those Members of the Bar who fail to immediately and fully seek to bring remedy to those harmed — and most especially to those “sovereign citizens” who have had sense and courage enough to bring their claims forward — even despite their pitiful lack of familiarity with international and commercial and martial law — and thus have pushed the Truth over the edge and are now in the process of bringing this Evil and Oppressive System to a well-deserved end.
Brave men like Doctor Cordero have always stood for what is right and opposed what is wrong, even without the goad of imminent Justice being done. The rest of the “Mixed Class” like Mr. Ferran, however, had better consider their position more akin to rats departing a sinking ship and hope that they can swim fast enough in the right direction to reach land ahead of the Tsunami brewing in the international jurisdiction of the sea.
For Mr. Ferran and all those Bar Association Members who are so viscously pursuing their old trade as inland pirates, insulting their victims, and imagining that their criminality will never be discovered, opposed, and punished — the jig is up, the Public Liens are coming, the American Military will not fire on the people they are hired to protect, and the United Nations is in no position to do anything but attempt to salvage its own reputation. It remains to be seen whether Dr. Cordero’s efforts and those of others like him will be sufficient to prevent the outlawing and liquidation of the Bar Associations worldwide and the permanent disgrace of the entire profession.